From patchwork Thu Dec 2 12:34:15 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hans de Goede X-Patchwork-Id: 12652539 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bhelgaas@google.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D42C433FE for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347167AbhLBMhw (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2021 07:37:52 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:59445 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347218AbhLBMhs (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2021 07:37:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1638448464; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IIDQVYYBB9t0nEO9DwrepYyYU5jWxgri7pNSMrWnlOk=; b=BkUDY9y6YLEMpMIaofRDfGYYXyBTqHyWA76dW6RMFNrSI18+RHzbJ2pprZxtkECYA32m0P xxWveEqsyrdjgTTTfbvPw3W9jQXOYAGKm6eR3RtJhJnAuKnDEsS/BhJPn2zPREq8LilBLg y4rmluAHtzYaK6EU4TmHrQ4PGGT15jI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-432-bkwfPDW2MQyCnk5g-y6kCg-1; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 07:34:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: bkwfPDW2MQyCnk5g-y6kCg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9F6710151E7; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1.localdomain (unknown [10.39.194.215]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD715C25A; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:34:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Hans de Goede To: Bjorn Helgaas , Lukas Wunner Cc: Hans de Goede , Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Mika Westerberg , Yehezkel Bernat , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2] PCI: pciehp: Use down_read/write_nested(reset_lock) to fix lockdep errors Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:34:15 +0100 Message-Id: <20211202123415.25737-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Use down_read_nested() and down_write_nested() when taking the ctrl->reset_lock rw-sem, passing the number of PCIe hotplug controllers in the path to the PCI root bus as lock subclass parameter. This fixes the following false-positive lockdep report when unplugging a Lenovo X1C8 from a Lenovo 2nd gen TB3 dock: [ 28.583853] pcieport 0000:06:01.0: pciehp: Slot(1): Link Down [ 28.583891] pcieport 0000:06:01.0: pciehp: Slot(1): Card not present [ 28.584849] ============================================ [ 28.584854] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 28.584858] 5.16.0-rc2+ #621 Not tainted [ 28.584864] -------------------------------------------- [ 28.584867] irq/124-pciehp/86 is trying to acquire lock: [ 28.584873] ffff8e5ac4299ef8 (&ctrl->reset_lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: pciehp_check_presence+0x23/0x80 [ 28.584904] but task is already holding lock: [ 28.584908] ffff8e5ac4298af8 (&ctrl->reset_lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: pciehp_ist+0xf3/0x180 [ 28.584929] other info that might help us debug this: [ 28.584933] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 28.584936] CPU0 [ 28.584939] ---- [ 28.584942] lock(&ctrl->reset_lock); [ 28.584949] lock(&ctrl->reset_lock); [ 28.584955] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 28.584959] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 28.584963] 3 locks held by irq/124-pciehp/86: [ 28.584970] #0: ffff8e5ac4298af8 (&ctrl->reset_lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: pciehp_ist+0xf3/0x180 [ 28.584991] #1: ffffffffa3b024e8 (pci_rescan_remove_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x31/0x110 [ 28.585012] #2: ffff8e5ac1ee2248 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver+0x1c/0x40 [ 28.585037] stack backtrace: [ 28.585042] CPU: 4 PID: 86 Comm: irq/124-pciehp Not tainted 5.16.0-rc2+ #621 [ 28.585052] Hardware name: LENOVO 20U90SIT19/20U90SIT19, BIOS N2WET30W (1.20 ) 08/26/2021 [ 28.585059] Call Trace: [ 28.585064] [ 28.585073] dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x73 [ 28.585087] __lock_acquire.cold+0xc5/0x2c6 [ 28.585106] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [ 28.585124] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 [ 28.585132] ? pciehp_check_presence+0x23/0x80 [ 28.585144] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x120 [ 28.585161] down_read+0x3e/0x50 [ 28.585172] ? pciehp_check_presence+0x23/0x80 [ 28.585183] pciehp_check_presence+0x23/0x80 [ 28.585194] pciehp_runtime_resume+0x5c/0xa0 [ 28.585206] ? pci_msix_init+0x60/0x60 [ 28.585214] device_for_each_child+0x45/0x70 [ 28.585227] pcie_port_device_runtime_resume+0x20/0x30 [ 28.585236] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa7/0xc0 [ 28.585246] ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x100/0x100 [ 28.585257] __rpm_callback+0x41/0x110 [ 28.585271] ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x100/0x100 [ 28.585281] rpm_callback+0x59/0x70 [ 28.585293] rpm_resume+0x512/0x7b0 [ 28.585309] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x90 [ 28.585322] __device_release_driver+0x28/0x240 [ 28.585338] device_release_driver+0x26/0x40 [ 28.585351] pci_stop_bus_device+0x68/0x90 [ 28.585363] pci_stop_bus_device+0x2c/0x90 [ 28.585373] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20 [ 28.585384] pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x6c/0x110 [ 28.585396] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x58/0x90 [ 28.585409] pciehp_disable_slot+0x5b/0xe0 [ 28.585421] pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change+0xc3/0x2f0 [ 28.585436] pciehp_ist+0x179/0x180 [ 28.585449] ? disable_irq_nosync+0x10/0x10 [ 28.585460] irq_thread_fn+0x1d/0x60 [ 28.585470] ? irq_thread+0x81/0x1a0 [ 28.585480] irq_thread+0xcb/0x1a0 [ 28.585491] ? irq_thread_fn+0x60/0x60 [ 28.585502] ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0xb0/0xb0 [ 28.585514] kthread+0x165/0x190 [ 28.585522] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 28.585531] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 28.585554] This lockdep warning is triggered because with Thunderbolt, hotplug ports are nested. When removing multiple devices in a daisy-chain, each hotplug port's reset_lock may be acquired recursively. It's never the same lock, so the lockdep splat is a false positive. Because locks at the same hierarchy level are never acquired recursively, a per-level lockdep class is sufficient to fix the lockdep warning. The choice to use one lockdep subclass per pcie-hotplug controller in the path to the root-bus was made to conserve class keys because their number is limited and the complexity grows quadratically with number of keys according to Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190402021933.GA2966@mit.edu/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/de684a28-9038-8fc6-27ca-3f6f2f6400d7@redhat.com/ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: "Theodore Ts'o" Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner --- Changes in v2: - Only use a subclass for each hotplug capable port/parent in the path to the PCI root bus, instead of one for each level in the PCI hierarchy, to avoid hitting MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES - Drop the "PCI: Add a pci_dev_depth() helper function" since we now need a special version of this to only count hotplug ports - Various commit message improvements --- drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h | 3 +++ drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h index 918dccbc74b6..e0a614acee05 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ extern int pciehp_poll_time; * @reset_lock: prevents access to the Data Link Layer Link Active bit in the * Link Status register and to the Presence Detect State bit in the Slot * Status register during a slot reset which may cause them to flap + * @depth: Number of additional hotplug ports in the path to the root bus, + * used as lock subclass for @reset_lock * @ist_running: flag to keep user request waiting while IRQ thread is running * @request_result: result of last user request submitted to the IRQ thread * @requester: wait queue to wake up on completion of user request, @@ -106,6 +108,7 @@ struct controller { struct hotplug_slot hotplug_slot; /* hotplug core interface */ struct rw_semaphore reset_lock; + unsigned int depth; unsigned int ist_running; int request_result; wait_queue_head_t requester; diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c index f34114d45259..4042d87d539d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void pciehp_check_presence(struct controller *ctrl) { int occupied; - down_read(&ctrl->reset_lock); + down_read_nested(&ctrl->reset_lock, ctrl->depth); mutex_lock(&ctrl->state_lock); occupied = pciehp_card_present_or_link_active(ctrl); diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c index 83a0fa119cae..963fb50528da 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ static void pciehp_ignore_dpc_link_change(struct controller *ctrl, * the corresponding link change may have been ignored above. * Synthesize it to ensure that it is acted on. */ - down_read(&ctrl->reset_lock); + down_read_nested(&ctrl->reset_lock, ctrl->depth); if (!pciehp_check_link_active(ctrl)) pciehp_request(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC); up_read(&ctrl->reset_lock); @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_ist(int irq, void *dev_id) * Disable requests have higher priority than Presence Detect Changed * or Data Link Layer State Changed events. */ - down_read(&ctrl->reset_lock); + down_read_nested(&ctrl->reset_lock, ctrl->depth); if (events & DISABLE_SLOT) pciehp_handle_disable_request(ctrl); else if (events & (PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC)) @@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ int pciehp_reset_slot(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug_slot, bool probe) if (probe) return 0; - down_write(&ctrl->reset_lock); + down_write_nested(&ctrl->reset_lock, ctrl->depth); if (!ATTN_BUTTN(ctrl)) { ctrl_mask |= PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PDCE; @@ -962,6 +962,20 @@ static inline void dbg_ctrl(struct controller *ctrl) #define FLAG(x, y) (((x) & (y)) ? '+' : '-') +static inline int pcie_hotplug_depth(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + struct pci_bus *bus = dev->bus; + int depth = 0; + + while (bus->parent) { + bus = bus->parent; + if (bus->self && bus->self->is_hotplug_bridge) + depth++; + } + + return depth; +} + struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev) { struct controller *ctrl; @@ -975,6 +989,7 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev) return NULL; ctrl->pcie = dev; + ctrl->depth = pcie_hotplug_depth(dev->port); pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, &slot_cap); if (pdev->hotplug_user_indicators)