mbox series

[0/3] scsi|phy: Add SM8450 UFS & Phy support

Message ID 20211201074456.3969849-1-vkoul@kernel.org
Headers show
Series scsi|phy: Add SM8450 UFS & Phy support | expand

Message

Vinod Koul Dec. 1, 2021, 7:44 a.m. UTC 
Add the binding documentation for ufs SM8450 compatible, phy compatible and
SM8450 UFS QMP Phy support.

Vinod Koul (3):
  scsi: ufs: dt-bindings: Add SM8450 compatible strings
  dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: Add SM8450 UFS phy compatible
  phy: qcom-qmp: Add SM8450 UFS QMP Phy

 .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qmp-phy.yaml |  1 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt |  1 +
 drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c           | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+)

Comments

Martin K. Petersen Dec. 3, 2021, 2:58 a.m. UTC | #1 
Vinod,

> Add the binding documentation for ufs SM8450 compatible, phy
> compatible and SM8450 UFS QMP Phy support.

>  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qmp-phy.yaml |  1 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt |  1 +
>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c           | 32 +++++++++++++++++++

No objections from me. However, these patches should go through the DT
and phy trees.
Vinod Koul Dec. 3, 2021, 5:42 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 02-12-21, 21:58, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Vinod,
> 
> > Add the binding documentation for ufs SM8450 compatible, phy
> > compatible and SM8450 UFS QMP Phy support.
> 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qmp-phy.yaml |  1 +
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt |  1 +
> >  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c           | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
> 
> No objections from me. However, these patches should go through the DT
> and phy trees.

Ok I can pick these up wearing my phy maintainer hat, can u pls ack
it...

Thanks
Martin K. Petersen Dec. 7, 2021, 2:35 a.m. UTC | #3 
Vinod,

>> No objections from me. However, these patches should go through the
>> DT and phy trees.
>
> Ok I can pick these up wearing my phy maintainer hat, can u pls ack
> it...

This series doesn't touch anything under SCSI. But it does look OK to
me, so...

Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Vinod Koul Dec. 7, 2021, 11:59 a.m. UTC | #4 
On 06-12-21, 21:35, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Vinod,
> 
> >> No objections from me. However, these patches should go through the
> >> DT and phy trees.
> >
> > Ok I can pick these up wearing my phy maintainer hat, can u pls ack
> > it...
> 
> This series doesn't touch anything under SCSI. But it does look OK to
> me, so...

I would consider scsi dt-update in your bucket :)
> 
> Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

Thanks for that

I have picked the series now.