diff mbox series

[v3,13/15] drm/msm/hdmi: pair msm_hdmi_phy_powerup with msm_hdmi_phy_powerdown

Message ID 20230928111630.1217419-14-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
State Handled Elsewhere
Headers show
Series drm/msm/hdmi & phy: use generic PHY framework | expand

Commit Message

Dmitry Baryshkov Sept. 28, 2023, 11:16 a.m. UTC
In preparation to converting MSM HDMI driver to use PHY framework, which
requires phy_power_on() calls to be paired with phy_power_off(), add a
conditional call to msm_hdmi_phy_powerdown() before the call to
msm_hdmi_phy_powerup().

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.h        | 1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_bridge.c | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

Comments

Konrad Dybcio Oct. 26, 2023, 7:54 p.m. UTC | #1
On 9/28/23 13:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> In preparation to converting MSM HDMI driver to use PHY framework, which
> requires phy_power_on() calls to be paired with phy_power_off(), add a
> conditional call to msm_hdmi_phy_powerdown() before the call to
> msm_hdmi_phy_powerup().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
Is this a conversion artifact that will be undone, or does the
framework actually expect that refcounting may not be enough and
phy resetting will have to take place?

Konrad
Dmitry Baryshkov Oct. 26, 2023, 8:46 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 22:54, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/28/23 13:16, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > In preparation to converting MSM HDMI driver to use PHY framework, which
> > requires phy_power_on() calls to be paired with phy_power_off(), add a
> > conditional call to msm_hdmi_phy_powerdown() before the call to
> > msm_hdmi_phy_powerup().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> Is this a conversion artifact that will be undone, or does the
> framework actually expect that refcounting may not be enough and
> phy resetting will have to take place?

I don't remember why I did it this way. Let me check, most likely this
patch can be completely dropped as the enable / disable operations are
paired by the DRM core.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.h
index 2d405da63bd0..46ae7ef9bc98 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@  struct hdmi {
 
 	/* video state: */
 	bool power_on;
+	bool phy_power_on;
 	unsigned long int pixclock;
 
 	void __iomem *mmio;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_bridge.c
index bb10b35194ff..1bbd76e595af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi_bridge.c
@@ -148,7 +148,11 @@  static void msm_hdmi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 		msm_hdmi_audio_update(hdmi);
 	}
 
+	if (hdmi->phy_power_on)
+		msm_hdmi_phy_powerdown(phy);
+
 	msm_hdmi_phy_powerup(phy, hdmi->pixclock);
+	hdmi->phy_power_on = true;
 
 	msm_hdmi_set_mode(hdmi, true);
 
@@ -170,6 +174,7 @@  static void msm_hdmi_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
 	msm_hdmi_set_mode(hdmi, false);
 
 	msm_hdmi_phy_powerdown(phy);
+	hdmi->phy_power_on = false;
 
 	if (hdmi->power_on) {
 		power_off(bridge);