From patchwork Tue Jul 28 15:09:35 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 11689351 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9C3913 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D78D204EA for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730910AbgG1POi (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:14:38 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:53496 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730889AbgG1POb (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:14:31 -0400 Received: from 89-64-88-69.dynamic.chello.pl (89.64.88.69) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.415) id 680a78bb8b8347f8; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:14:29 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM Cc: Linux Documentation , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Srinivas Pandruvada , Giovanni Gherdovich , Doug Smythies , Francisco Jerez Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:09:35 +0200 Message-ID: <13207937.r2GEYrEf4f@kreacher> In-Reply-To: <1709487.Bxjb1zNRZM@kreacher> References: <4981405.3kqTVLv5tO@kreacher> <1709487.Bxjb1zNRZM@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi All, On Monday, July 27, 2020 5:13:40 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, July 16, 2020 7:37:04 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > This really is a v2 of this patch: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11663271/ > > > > with an extra preceding cleanup patch to avoid making unrelated changes in the > > [2/2]. > > Almost the same as before, but the first patch has been reworked to handle > errors in store_energy_performance_preference() correctly and rebased on top > of the current linux-pm.git branch. > > No functional changes otherwise. One more update of the second patch. Namely, I realized that the hwp_dynamic_boost sysfs switch was present in the passive mode after the v3 (and the previous versions) of that patch which isn't correct, so this modifies it to avoid exposing hwp_dynamic_boost in the passive mode. The first patch is the same as in the v2. Thanks!