Message ID | 20190418144655.18758-1-lkundrak@v3.sk (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add support for XO 1.75 to OLPC battery driver | expand |
Hi, On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:46:45PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > This patch set modifies the OLPC battery driver so that it could eventually > be used on an Arm-based OLPC XO 1.75 machine. > > Compared to the previous version, it addresses review comments for the > x86 platform parts from Thomas Gleixner. Details in individual patches' > change logs. > > I've failed to version the previous iteration of the set that should've > been "v6" for the change logs to make sense. Sorry for that. > > Thank you, > Lubo I queued up the complete patchset via an immutable branch based on v5.1-rc1. X86 maintainers can pull this signed immutable branch as required. Thanks for the patches, -- Sebastian The following changes since commit 9e98c678c2d6ae3a17cb2de55d17f69dddaa231b: Linux 5.1-rc1 (2019-03-17 14:22:26 -0700) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-power-supply.git tags/psy-olpc-1.75-battery-signed for you to fetch changes up to 31e220877981d0005d0c4a76f68027a73131212b: power: supply: olpc_battery: Have the framework register sysfs files for us (2019-04-18 21:55:04 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Immutable branch between x86 and power-supply for OLPC This immutable branch contains the changes required for OLPC 1.75 battery, which touches x86 and power-supply and is based on v5.1-rc1. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> ---------------------------------------------------------------- Lubomir Rintel (10): dt-bindings: olpc_battery: Add XO-1.5 battery x86/platform/olpc: Don't split string literals when fixing up the DT x86/platform/olpc: Trivial code move in DT fixup x86/platform/olpc: Use a correct version when making up a battery node power: supply: olpc_battery: Use DT to get battery version power: supply: olpc_battery: Move priv data to a struct power: supply: olpc_battery: Use devm_power_supply_register() power: supply: olpc_battery: Avoid using platform_info power: supply: olpc_battery: Add OLPC XO 1.75 support power: supply: olpc_battery: Have the framework register sysfs files for us .../bindings/power/supply/olpc_battery.txt | 2 +- arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c | 101 ++++++++---- drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c | 169 +++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
* Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:46:45PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > This patch set modifies the OLPC battery driver so that it could eventually > > be used on an Arm-based OLPC XO 1.75 machine. > > > > Compared to the previous version, it addresses review comments for the > > x86 platform parts from Thomas Gleixner. Details in individual patches' > > change logs. > > > > I've failed to version the previous iteration of the set that should've > > been "v6" for the change logs to make sense. Sorry for that. > > > > Thank you, > > Lubo > > I queued up the complete patchset via an immutable branch based on > v5.1-rc1. X86 maintainers can pull this signed immutable branch as > required. Thanks for the patches, Would you mind sending these patches to Linus yourself, as part of the power-supply tree? That's where it really belongs, the impact on arch/x86/ was mostly drive-by (and it's now all Acked-by Thomas), the meat of the changes is in the OLPC battery driver. Thanks, Ingo
Hi Ingo, On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 09:57:16AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:46:45PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > This patch set modifies the OLPC battery driver so that it could eventually > > > be used on an Arm-based OLPC XO 1.75 machine. > > > > > > Compared to the previous version, it addresses review comments for the > > > x86 platform parts from Thomas Gleixner. Details in individual patches' > > > change logs. > > > > > > I've failed to version the previous iteration of the set that should've > > > been "v6" for the change logs to make sense. Sorry for that. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Lubo > > > > I queued up the complete patchset via an immutable branch based on > > v5.1-rc1. X86 maintainers can pull this signed immutable branch as > > required. Thanks for the patches, > > Would you mind sending these patches to Linus yourself, as part of the > power-supply tree? > > That's where it really belongs, the impact on arch/x86/ was mostly > drive-by (and it's now all Acked-by Thomas), the meat of the changes is > in the OLPC battery driver. Yes, I merged the immutable branch into power-supply. You can either also merge it (e.g. when you plan to add other changes), or just ignore it :) This is what I usually do with other subsystems to avoid pointless merge conflicts. TLDR: Yes. -- Sebastian