| Message ID | 20191211203143.2952-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | brcmstb_thermal updates for new processes | expand |
On 12/11/2019 12:31 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi, > > This patch series contains a bug fix for the existing platforms and then > paves the way for adding support for Broadcom STB's latest chips in 16nm > processes, and finally updates the driver with pecularities introduced > with the 16nm, like the lack of interrupt notification from the HW. > > Please queue up the first patch for -stable if you want, thanks! Amit, Daniel, Rui, does this look acceptable to you now? Thank you > > Changes in v2: > > - kept defined constants in patch #1 and keep using them for subsequent > patches > - add Reviewed-by tags to patches #3 through #6 > - rebase against v5.5.-rc1 > > Florian Fainelli (6): > thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Do not use DT coefficients > thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Prepare to support a different process > dt-bindings: thermal: Define BCM7216 thermal sensor compatible > thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Add 16nm process thermal parameters > thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Restructure interrupt registration > thermal: brcmstb_thermal: Register different ops per process > > .../bindings/thermal/brcm,avs-tmon.txt | 8 +- > drivers/thermal/broadcom/brcmstb_thermal.c | 99 ++++++++++++------- > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) >
On 12/26/19 7:54 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 12/11/2019 12:31 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch series contains a bug fix for the existing platforms and then >> paves the way for adding support for Broadcom STB's latest chips in 16nm >> processes, and finally updates the driver with pecularities introduced >> with the 16nm, like the lack of interrupt notification from the HW. >> >> Please queue up the first patch for -stable if you want, thanks! > > Amit, Daniel, Rui, does this look acceptable to you now? Thank you Ping? Is this good to go now?