Message ID | 20230202093256.32458-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | some minor fixes of error checking about debugfs_rename() | expand |
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net.git (master) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 17:32:53 +0800 you wrote: > Since commit ff9fb72bc077 ("debugfs: return error values, not NULL") changed > return value of debugfs_rename() in error cases from %NULL to %ERR_PTR(-ERROR). > The comments and checks corresponding to debugfs_rename() should also be updated > and fixed. > > Qi Zheng (3): > debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() > bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() > PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [1/3] debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() (no matching commit) - [2/3] bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbe83191d40d - [3/3] PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() (no matching commit) You are awesome, thank you!
On 2023/2/4 11:30, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org wrote: > Hello: > > This series was applied to netdev/net.git (master) > by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 17:32:53 +0800 you wrote: >> Since commit ff9fb72bc077 ("debugfs: return error values, not NULL") changed >> return value of debugfs_rename() in error cases from %NULL to %ERR_PTR(-ERROR). >> The comments and checks corresponding to debugfs_rename() should also be updated >> and fixed. >> >> Qi Zheng (3): >> debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() >> bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() >> PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() >> >> [...] > > Here is the summary with links: > - [1/3] debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() > (no matching commit) > - [2/3] bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbe83191d40d > - [3/3] PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() > (no matching commit) Hi all, Does "no matching commit" means that these two patches have not been applied? And I did not see them in the linux-next branch. If so, hi Greg, Can you help to review and apply these two patches ([1/3] and [3/3])? Thanks, Qi > > You are awesome, thank you!
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:30:40 +0800 Qi Zheng wrote: > > Here is the summary with links: > > - [1/3] debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() > > (no matching commit) > > - [2/3] bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbe83191d40d > > - [3/3] PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() > > (no matching commit) > > Does "no matching commit" means that these two patches have not been > applied? And I did not see them in the linux-next branch. Correct, we took the networking patch to the networking tree. You'd be better off not grouping patches from different subsystems if there are no dependencies. Maintainers may get confused about who's supposed to apply them, err on the side of caution and not apply anything. > If so, hi Greg, Can you help to review and apply these two patches > ([1/3] and [3/3])? Or 3/3 should go to Viresh?.. Dunno..
On 2023/2/8 02:31, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:30:40 +0800 Qi Zheng wrote: >>> Here is the summary with links: >>> - [1/3] debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() >>> (no matching commit) >>> - [2/3] bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() >>> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbe83191d40d >>> - [3/3] PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() >>> (no matching commit) >> >> Does "no matching commit" means that these two patches have not been >> applied? And I did not see them in the linux-next branch. > Hi Jakub, > Correct, we took the networking patch to the networking tree. Thank you very much. :) > You'd be better off not grouping patches from different subsystems > if there are no dependencies. Maintainers may get confused about > who's supposed to apply them, err on the side of caution and > not apply anything. Got it. I will send [1/3] and [3/3] separately. > >> If so, hi Greg, Can you help to review and apply these two patches >> ([1/3] and [3/3])? > > Or 3/3 should go to Viresh?.. Dunno.. Got it. Thanks, Qi
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:31:24AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:30:40 +0800 Qi Zheng wrote: > > > Here is the summary with links: > > > - [1/3] debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() > > > (no matching commit) > > > - [2/3] bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbe83191d40d > > > - [3/3] PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() > > > (no matching commit) > > > > Does "no matching commit" means that these two patches have not been > > applied? And I did not see them in the linux-next branch. > > Correct, we took the networking patch to the networking tree. > You'd be better off not grouping patches from different subsystems > if there are no dependencies. Maintainers may get confused about > who's supposed to apply them, err on the side of caution and > not apply anything. > > > If so, hi Greg, Can you help to review and apply these two patches > > ([1/3] and [3/3])? If someone sends me patch 1, I can and will review it then. Otherwise, digging it out of a random patch series is pretty impossible with my patch load, sorry. thanks, greg k-h
On 2023/2/8 19:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:31:24AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:30:40 +0800 Qi Zheng wrote: >>>> Here is the summary with links: >>>> - [1/3] debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() >>>> (no matching commit) >>>> - [2/3] bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() >>>> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbe83191d40d >>>> - [3/3] PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() >>>> (no matching commit) >>> >>> Does "no matching commit" means that these two patches have not been >>> applied? And I did not see them in the linux-next branch. >> >> Correct, we took the networking patch to the networking tree. >> You'd be better off not grouping patches from different subsystems >> if there are no dependencies. Maintainers may get confused about >> who's supposed to apply them, err on the side of caution and >> not apply anything. >> >>> If so, hi Greg, Can you help to review and apply these two patches >>> ([1/3] and [3/3])? > > If someone sends me patch 1, I can and will review it then. Otherwise, > digging it out of a random patch series is pretty impossible with my > patch load, sorry. Hi Greg, Sorry about this. My bad. And I have sent the [1/3] separately, please review it if you have time. :) Thanks, Qi > > thanks, > > greg k-h
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:05:44PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote: > > > On 2023/2/8 19:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:31:24AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:30:40 +0800 Qi Zheng wrote: > > > > > Here is the summary with links: > > > > > - [1/3] debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > - [2/3] bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbe83191d40d > > > > > - [3/3] PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > > > Does "no matching commit" means that these two patches have not been > > > > applied? And I did not see them in the linux-next branch. > > > > > > Correct, we took the networking patch to the networking tree. > > > You'd be better off not grouping patches from different subsystems > > > if there are no dependencies. Maintainers may get confused about > > > who's supposed to apply them, err on the side of caution and > > > not apply anything. > > > > > > > If so, hi Greg, Can you help to review and apply these two patches > > > > ([1/3] and [3/3])? > > > > If someone sends me patch 1, I can and will review it then. Otherwise, > > digging it out of a random patch series is pretty impossible with my > > patch load, sorry. > > Hi Greg, > > Sorry about this. My bad. And I have sent the [1/3] separately, please > review it if you have time. :) Ick, somehow all of these got marked as spam by my filters. I'll look at them next week, sorry for the delay. greg k-h
On 2023/2/11 17:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:05:44PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote: >> >> >> On 2023/2/8 19:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:31:24AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:30:40 +0800 Qi Zheng wrote: >>>>>> Here is the summary with links: >>>>>> - [1/3] debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() >>>>>> (no matching commit) >>>>>> - [2/3] bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() >>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbe83191d40d >>>>>> - [3/3] PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() >>>>>> (no matching commit) >>>>> >>>>> Does "no matching commit" means that these two patches have not been >>>>> applied? And I did not see them in the linux-next branch. >>>> >>>> Correct, we took the networking patch to the networking tree. >>>> You'd be better off not grouping patches from different subsystems >>>> if there are no dependencies. Maintainers may get confused about >>>> who's supposed to apply them, err on the side of caution and >>>> not apply anything. >>>> >>>>> If so, hi Greg, Can you help to review and apply these two patches >>>>> ([1/3] and [3/3])? >>> >>> If someone sends me patch 1, I can and will review it then. Otherwise, >>> digging it out of a random patch series is pretty impossible with my >>> patch load, sorry. >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> Sorry about this. My bad. And I have sent the [1/3] separately, please >> review it if you have time. :) > > Ick, somehow all of these got marked as spam by my filters. I'll look > at them next week, sorry for the delay. No worries. And the patch link that has been resent is https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230208035634.58095-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/. :) Thank you very much, Qi > > greg k-h
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 05:12:46PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote: > > > On 2023/2/11 17:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:05:44PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2023/2/8 19:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:31:24AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 18:30:40 +0800 Qi Zheng wrote: > > > > > > > Here is the summary with links: > > > > > > > - [1/3] debugfs: update comment of debugfs_rename() > > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > > - [2/3] bonding: fix error checking in bond_debug_reregister() > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbe83191d40d > > > > > > > - [3/3] PM/OPP: fix error checking in opp_migrate_dentry() > > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > > > > > > > Does "no matching commit" means that these two patches have not been > > > > > > applied? And I did not see them in the linux-next branch. > > > > > > > > > > Correct, we took the networking patch to the networking tree. > > > > > You'd be better off not grouping patches from different subsystems > > > > > if there are no dependencies. Maintainers may get confused about > > > > > who's supposed to apply them, err on the side of caution and > > > > > not apply anything. > > > > > > > > > > > If so, hi Greg, Can you help to review and apply these two patches > > > > > > ([1/3] and [3/3])? > > > > > > > > If someone sends me patch 1, I can and will review it then. Otherwise, > > > > digging it out of a random patch series is pretty impossible with my > > > > patch load, sorry. > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > Sorry about this. My bad. And I have sent the [1/3] separately, please > > > review it if you have time. :) > > > > Ick, somehow all of these got marked as spam by my filters. I'll look > > at them next week, sorry for the delay. > No worries. And the patch link that has been resent is > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230208035634.58095-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/. > :) Both now queued up, thanks. greg k-h