| Message ID | 4985597.31r3eYUQgx@rjwysocki.net (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | thermal: core: Reimplement locking through guards | expand |
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > This is a continuation of > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@rjwysocki.net/ > > and (quite obviously) it is based on that series. > > The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net/ > > and there is one new patch ([02/11]). > > All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory. > > The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices > and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core. It also uses mutex > guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking. > > As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs. This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch in linux-pm.git.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > This is a continuation of > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@rjwysocki.net/ > > > > and (quite obviously) it is based on that series. > > > > The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net/ > > > > and there is one new patch ([02/11]). > > > > All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory. > > > > The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices > > and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core. It also uses mutex > > guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking. > > > > As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs. > > This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch > in linux-pm.git. I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've just queued it up for 6.13.
Hi Rafael, On 10/21/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> This is a continuation of >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@rjwysocki.net/ >>> >>> and (quite obviously) it is based on that series. >>> >>> The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net/ >>> >>> and there is one new patch ([02/11]). >>> >>> All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory. >>> >>> The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices >>> and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core. It also uses mutex >>> guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking. >>> >>> As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs. >> >> This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch >> in linux-pm.git. > > I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC > session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've > just queued it up for 6.13. If it's not too late, I will do the review tomorrow. Regards, Lukasz
Hi Lukasz, On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:02 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > On 10/21/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Everyone, > >>> > >>> This is a continuation of > >>> > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@rjwysocki.net/ > >>> > >>> and (quite obviously) it is based on that series. > >>> > >>> The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in > >>> > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net/ > >>> > >>> and there is one new patch ([02/11]). > >>> > >>> All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory. > >>> > >>> The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices > >>> and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core. It also uses mutex > >>> guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking. > >>> > >>> As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs. > >> > >> This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch > >> in linux-pm.git. > > > > I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC > > session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've > > just queued it up for 6.13. > > If it's not too late, I will do the review tomorrow. No, it isn't, please do!
On 10/22/24 10:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:02 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Rafael, >> >> On 10/21/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> This is a continuation of >>>>> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@rjwysocki.net/ >>>>> >>>>> and (quite obviously) it is based on that series. >>>>> >>>>> The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in >>>>> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net/ >>>>> >>>>> and there is one new patch ([02/11]). >>>>> >>>>> All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory. >>>>> >>>>> The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices >>>>> and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core. It also uses mutex >>>>> guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking. >>>>> >>>>> As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs. >>>> >>>> This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch >>>> in linux-pm.git. >>> >>> I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC >>> session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've >>> just queued it up for 6.13. >> >> If it's not too late, I will do the review tomorrow. > > No, it isn't, please do! OK, I will do that today.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:19 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote: > > > > On 10/22/24 10:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi Lukasz, > > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:02 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Rafael, > >> > >> On 10/21/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Everyone, > >>>>> > >>>>> This is a continuation of > >>>>> > >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@rjwysocki.net/ > >>>>> > >>>>> and (quite obviously) it is based on that series. > >>>>> > >>>>> The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in > >>>>> > >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net/ > >>>>> > >>>>> and there is one new patch ([02/11]). > >>>>> > >>>>> All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory. > >>>>> > >>>>> The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices > >>>>> and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core. It also uses mutex > >>>>> guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking. > >>>>> > >>>>> As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs. > >>>> > >>>> This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch > >>>> in linux-pm.git. > >>> > >>> I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC > >>> session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've > >>> just queued it up for 6.13. > >> > >> If it's not too late, I will do the review tomorrow. > > > > No, it isn't, please do! > > OK, I will do that today. Thank you!