Message ID | cover.1588829892.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Support ROHM BD99954 charger IC | expand |
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:03:06AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > Sorry folks for excessive amount of emails. I am resending this once > more (I already resent v10 and v11 has no changes but was just rebased) > because I am afraid the previous version did not reach Mark. If this is > true - I am the one to blame. I see I sent original v10 to all other You probably should've mentioned in this mail something about applying on a shared branch - I had seen the mail about that and was planning to handle these this week but if I'd missed Sebastian's mail from earlier in the week I'd probably just look at this and realise I'd reviewed everything relevant in it.
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 14:17 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:03:06AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > Sorry folks for excessive amount of emails. I am resending this > > once > > more (I already resent v10 and v11 has no changes but was just > > rebased) > > because I am afraid the previous version did not reach Mark. If > > this is > > true - I am the one to blame. I see I sent original v10 to all > > other > > You probably should've mentioned in this mail something about > applying > on a shared branch - I had seen the mail about that and was planning > to > handle these this week but if I'd missed Sebastian's mail from > earlier > in the week I'd probably just look at this and realise I'd reviewed > everything relevant in it. Thanks for the tip. I'll try to keep this in mind for the future and add a note about applying in different trees to cover letter. --Matti
On Thu, 7 May 2020 09:03:06 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > Sorry folks for excessive amount of emails. I am resending this once > more (I already resent v10 and v11 has no changes but was just rebased) > because I am afraid the previous version did not reach Mark. If this is > true - I am the one to blame. I see I sent original v10 to all other > recipients and lists - except the LKML. So perhaps it evaded Mark's > email filters. And the resend was also sent with the same message-id as > original v10 so even though it did include the LKML it might still have > gone unnoticed. I send this version to limited audience as it has no > changes compared to original v10 - and it already has pretty much all > the acks. > > [...] Applied to local tree regulator/for-5.7 Thanks! [1/3] lib: add linear ranges helpers (no commit info) [2/3] lib/test_linear_ranges: add a test for the 'linear_ranges' (no commit info) [3/3] regulator: use linear_ranges helper (no commit info) All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark