| Message ID | 1357650191-30842-1-git-send-email-rajagopal.venkat@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 01/08/2013 06:33 PM, Rajagopal Venkat wrote: > while reparenting a clock, NULL check is done for clock in > consideration and its new parent. So re-check is not required. > If done, else part becomes unreachable. > > Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat <rajagopal.venkat@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/clk/clk.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c > index 251e45d..f896584 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c > @@ -1048,10 +1048,7 @@ void __clk_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent) > > hlist_del(&clk->child_node); > > - if (new_parent) > - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children); > - else > - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &clk_orphan_list); > + hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children); > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG > if (!inited) > The same logic holds good for following piece of code too. 1060 |-------if (new_parent) 1061 |-------|-------new_parent_d = new_parent->dentry; 1062 |-------else 1063 |-------|-------new_parent_d = orphandir;
On 9 January 2013 11:20, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote: > On 01/08/2013 06:33 PM, Rajagopal Venkat wrote: >> while reparenting a clock, NULL check is done for clock in >> consideration and its new parent. So re-check is not required. >> If done, else part becomes unreachable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat <rajagopal.venkat@linaro.org> >> --- >> drivers/clk/clk.c | 5 +---- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c >> index 251e45d..f896584 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c >> @@ -1048,10 +1048,7 @@ void __clk_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent) >> >> hlist_del(&clk->child_node); >> >> - if (new_parent) >> - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children); >> - else >> - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &clk_orphan_list); >> + hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children); >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG >> if (!inited) >> > > The same logic holds good for following piece of code too. > > 1060 |-------if (new_parent) > 1061 |-------|-------new_parent_d = new_parent->dentry; > 1062 |-------else > 1063 |-------|-------new_parent_d = orphandir; Yes. Thanks for pointing out. > > > -- > Tushar Behera
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index 251e45d..f896584 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -1048,10 +1048,7 @@ void __clk_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent) hlist_del(&clk->child_node); - if (new_parent) - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children); - else - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &clk_orphan_list); + hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children); #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG if (!inited)
while reparenting a clock, NULL check is done for clock in consideration and its new parent. So re-check is not required. If done, else part becomes unreachable. Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat <rajagopal.venkat@linaro.org> --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)