| Message ID | 1436456621-29839-5-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 10.07.2015 00:43, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the > arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type. Add the CPU clock > configuration data and instantiate the CPU clock type for Exynos4x12. > > Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham. > > Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> > Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > index cae2c048..3071260 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > @@ -1396,6 +1396,45 @@ static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4210_armclk_d[] __initconst = { > { 0 }, > }; > > +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4212_armclk_d[] __initconst = { > + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, > + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, > + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, > + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, > + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, > + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, > + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, > + { 0 }, > +}; > + > +#define E4412_CPU_DIV1(cores, hpm, copy) \ > + (((cores) << 8) | ((hpm) << 4) | ((copy) << 0)) > + > +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4412_armclk_d[] __initconst = { > + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(7, 0, 6), }, > + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 6), }, > + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 5), }, > + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 5), }, > + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 4), }, > + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 4), }, > + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 3), }, > + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, > + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, > + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, > + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, > + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, > + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, > + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4412_CPU_DIV1(0, 0, 3), }, > + { 0 }, > +}; Numbers look fine! > + > /* register exynos4 clocks */ > static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > enum exynos4_soc soc) > @@ -1489,6 +1528,17 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(ctx, > exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks)); > + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412")) { The driver uses here enum exynos4_soc to differentiate between SoC (unless I missed some changes). This of_machine_is_compatible() makes sense but introduces inconsistency. I would prefer sticking to one convention: always enum or switch everything (before this patch) to of_compatible. Best regards, Krzysztof > + exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk", > + mout_core_p4x12[0], mout_core_p4x12[1], 0x14200, > + e4412_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4412_armclk_d), > + CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1); > + } else { > + exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk", > + mout_core_p4x12[0], mout_core_p4x12[1], 0x14200, > + e4212_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4212_armclk_d), > + CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1); > + } > } > > samsung_clk_register_alias(ctx, exynos4_aliases, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Krzysztof, On 07/10/2015 01:30 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 10.07.2015 00:43, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the >> arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type. Add the CPU clock >> configuration data and instantiate the CPU clock type for Exynos4x12. >> >> Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham. >> >> Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> >> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> >> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> >> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c >> index cae2c048..3071260 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c >> @@ -1396,6 +1396,45 @@ static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4210_armclk_d[] __initconst = { >> { 0 }, >> }; >> >> +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4212_armclk_d[] __initconst = { >> + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, >> + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, >> + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, >> + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, >> + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, >> + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, >> + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >> + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >> + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >> + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >> + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >> + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >> + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >> + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >> + { 0 }, >> +}; >> + >> +#define E4412_CPU_DIV1(cores, hpm, copy) \ >> + (((cores) << 8) | ((hpm) << 4) | ((copy) << 0)) >> + >> +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4412_armclk_d[] __initconst = { >> + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(7, 0, 6), }, >> + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 6), }, >> + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 5), }, >> + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 5), }, >> + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 4), }, >> + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 4), }, >> + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 3), }, >> + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, >> + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, >> + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, >> + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, >> + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, >> + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, >> + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4412_CPU_DIV1(0, 0, 3), }, >> + { 0 }, >> +}; > > Numbers look fine! > >> + >> /* register exynos4 clocks */ >> static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, >> enum exynos4_soc soc) >> @@ -1489,6 +1528,17 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, >> samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(ctx, >> exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks, >> ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks)); >> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412")) { > > The driver uses here enum exynos4_soc to differentiate between SoC > (unless I missed some changes). This of_machine_is_compatible() makes > sense but introduces inconsistency. I would prefer sticking to one > convention: always enum or switch everything (before this patch) to > of_compatible. > When reviewing this patch I also ran into the same thing because as you said, it's not consistent. But digging a little bit I found that is not that easy since the two are not checking exactly the same. The enum is to differentiate between "samsung,exynos4412-clock" and "samsung,exynos4210-clock" while the of_machine_is_compatible() is for "samsung,exynos4412" and "samsung,exynos4212". The problem is that both exynos4412 and exynos4212 use the same "samsung,exynos4412-clock" compatible for their clock controller nodes. But there are differences so it would had been better to also have a "samsung,exynos4212-clock" to avoid the of_machine_is_compatible() but that is not possible anymore without breaking DT backward compatibility. On the other hand, if of_machine_is_compatible() is used for everything, then there is no point anymore to have both "samsung,exynos4412-clock" and "samsung,exynos4210-clock". A single "samsung,exynos4-clock" plus checking the SoC would had been enough. That's why I thought that Bart's approach was sensible although is true that the of_compatible() check can be moved to exynos4412_clk_init() and the enum be extended so at least exynos4_clk_init() is consistent. > Best regards, > Krzysztof Best regards,
2015-07-11 1:12 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 07/10/2015 01:30 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 10.07.2015 00:43, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>> With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the >>> arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type. Add the CPU clock >>> configuration data and instantiate the CPU clock type for Exynos4x12. >>> >>> Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham. >>> >>> Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> >>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> >>> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c >>> index cae2c048..3071260 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c >>> @@ -1396,6 +1396,45 @@ static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4210_armclk_d[] __initconst = { >>> { 0 }, >>> }; >>> >>> +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4212_armclk_d[] __initconst = { >>> + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, >>> + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, >>> + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, >>> + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, >>> + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, >>> + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, >>> + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >>> + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >>> + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >>> + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >>> + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >>> + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >>> + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >>> + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, >>> + { 0 }, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +#define E4412_CPU_DIV1(cores, hpm, copy) \ >>> + (((cores) << 8) | ((hpm) << 4) | ((copy) << 0)) >>> + >>> +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4412_armclk_d[] __initconst = { >>> + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(7, 0, 6), }, >>> + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 6), }, >>> + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 5), }, >>> + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 5), }, >>> + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 4), }, >>> + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 4), }, >>> + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 3), }, >>> + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, >>> + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, >>> + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, >>> + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, >>> + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, >>> + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, >>> + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4412_CPU_DIV1(0, 0, 3), }, >>> + { 0 }, >>> +}; >> >> Numbers look fine! >> >>> + >>> /* register exynos4 clocks */ >>> static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, >>> enum exynos4_soc soc) >>> @@ -1489,6 +1528,17 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, >>> samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(ctx, >>> exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks, >>> ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks)); >>> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412")) { >> >> The driver uses here enum exynos4_soc to differentiate between SoC >> (unless I missed some changes). This of_machine_is_compatible() makes >> sense but introduces inconsistency. I would prefer sticking to one >> convention: always enum or switch everything (before this patch) to >> of_compatible. >> > > When reviewing this patch I also ran into the same thing because as you > said, it's not consistent. But digging a little bit I found that is not > that easy since the two are not checking exactly the same. > > The enum is to differentiate between "samsung,exynos4412-clock" and > "samsung,exynos4210-clock" while the of_machine_is_compatible() is for > "samsung,exynos4412" and "samsung,exynos4212". > > The problem is that both exynos4412 and exynos4212 use the same > "samsung,exynos4412-clock" compatible for their clock controller nodes. > But there are differences so it would had been better to also have a > "samsung,exynos4212-clock" to avoid the of_machine_is_compatible() but > that is not possible anymore without breaking DT backward compatibility. > > On the other hand, if of_machine_is_compatible() is used for everything, > then there is no point anymore to have both "samsung,exynos4412-clock" > and "samsung,exynos4210-clock". A single "samsung,exynos4-clock" plus > checking the SoC would had been enough. > > That's why I thought that Bart's approach was sensible although is true > that the of_compatible() check can be moved to exynos4412_clk_init() > and the enum be extended so at least exynos4_clk_init() is consistent. You're right, I missed that difference. Thanks for explaining, I agree now: Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 07/10/2015 12:43 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the > arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type. Add the CPU clock > configuration data and instantiate the CPU clock type for Exynos4x12. > > Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham. > > Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> > Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) I guess you prefer to have this whole series applied through one, e.g samsung-soc tree? If so, here is my ack. Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c index cae2c048..3071260 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c @@ -1396,6 +1396,45 @@ static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4210_armclk_d[] __initconst = { { 0 }, }; +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4212_armclk_d[] __initconst = { + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 6), }, + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 5), }, + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 4), }, + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4210_CPU_DIV1(2, 3), }, + { 0 }, +}; + +#define E4412_CPU_DIV1(cores, hpm, copy) \ + (((cores) << 8) | ((hpm) << 4) | ((copy) << 0)) + +static const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data e4412_armclk_d[] __initconst = { + { 1500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(7, 0, 6), }, + { 1400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 6, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 6), }, + { 1300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(6, 0, 5), }, + { 1200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 5, 0, 7, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 5), }, + { 1100000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(2, 1, 4, 0, 6, 3), E4412_CPU_DIV1(5, 0, 4), }, + { 1000000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 4, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 4), }, + { 900000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(4, 0, 3), }, + { 800000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 5, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, + { 700000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(3, 0, 3), }, + { 600000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, + { 500000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(2, 0, 3), }, + { 400000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 3, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, + { 300000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 2, 0, 4, 2), E4412_CPU_DIV1(1, 0, 3), }, + { 200000, E4210_CPU_DIV0(1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 1), E4412_CPU_DIV1(0, 0, 3), }, + { 0 }, +}; + /* register exynos4 clocks */ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, enum exynos4_soc soc) @@ -1489,6 +1528,17 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(ctx, exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_fixed_factor_clks)); + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos4412")) { + exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk", + mout_core_p4x12[0], mout_core_p4x12[1], 0x14200, + e4412_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4412_armclk_d), + CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1); + } else { + exynos_register_cpu_clock(ctx, CLK_ARM_CLK, "armclk", + mout_core_p4x12[0], mout_core_p4x12[1], 0x14200, + e4212_armclk_d, ARRAY_SIZE(e4212_armclk_d), + CLK_CPU_NEEDS_DEBUG_ALT_DIV | CLK_CPU_HAS_DIV1); + } } samsung_clk_register_alias(ctx, exynos4_aliases,
With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type. Add the CPU clock configuration data and instantiate the CPU clock type for Exynos4x12. Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham. Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> --- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)