diff mbox

[v2] PM / Domains: Call driver's noirq callbacks

Message ID 1497965895-11486-1-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Mikko Perttunen June 20, 2017, 1:38 p.m. UTC
Currently genpd installs its own suspend_noirq, resume_noirq,
and poweroff_noirq callbacks, but never calls down to the driver's
corresponding callbacks. Add these calls.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
---
v2:
- Moved pm_generic_suspend_noirq to before pm_runtime_force_suspend,
  and correspondingly pm_generic_resume_noirq after 
  pm_runtime_force_resume
- Added new pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq callback that is identical to
  pm_genpd_suspend_noirq but calls the appropriate driver callback

 drivers/base/power/domain.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ulf Hansson June 20, 2017, 2:18 p.m. UTC | #1
On 20 June 2017 at 15:38, Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> wrote:
> Currently genpd installs its own suspend_noirq, resume_noirq,
> and poweroff_noirq callbacks, but never calls down to the driver's
> corresponding callbacks. Add these calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Moved pm_generic_suspend_noirq to before pm_runtime_force_suspend,
>   and correspondingly pm_generic_resume_noirq after
>   pm_runtime_force_resume
> - Added new pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq callback that is identical to
>   pm_genpd_suspend_noirq but calls the appropriate driver callback
>
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index d3f1d96f75e9..b070ee58186d 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -919,6 +919,10 @@ static int pm_genpd_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>         if (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev))
>                 return 0;
>
> +       ret = pm_generic_suspend_noirq(dev);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
>         if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
>                 ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
>                 if (ret)
> @@ -961,6 +965,10 @@ static int pm_genpd_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>         if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
>                 ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
>
> +       ret = pm_generic_resume_noirq(dev);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> @@ -1015,6 +1023,46 @@ static int pm_genpd_thaw_noirq(struct device *dev)
>  }
>
>  /**
> + * pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq - Completion of hibernation of device in an
> + *   I/O PM domain.
> + * @dev: Device to poweroff.
> + *
> + * Stop the device and remove power from the domain if all devices in it have
> + * been stopped.
> + */
> +static int pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
> +
> +       genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
> +       if (IS_ERR(genpd))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev))
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       ret = pm_generic_poweroff_noirq(dev);

The only difference between  pm_genpd_suspend_noirq() and
pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq() is the above line. Can we re-factor the code
so we avoid open code here, please.

> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
> +               ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       genpd_lock(genpd);
> +       genpd->suspended_count++;
> +       genpd_sync_power_off(genpd, true, 0);
> +       genpd_unlock(genpd);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * pm_genpd_restore_noirq - Start of restore of device in an I/O PM domain.
>   * @dev: Device to resume.
>   *
> @@ -1493,7 +1541,7 @@ int pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>         genpd->domain.ops.resume_noirq = pm_genpd_resume_noirq;
>         genpd->domain.ops.freeze_noirq = pm_genpd_freeze_noirq;
>         genpd->domain.ops.thaw_noirq = pm_genpd_thaw_noirq;
> -       genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_noirq = pm_genpd_suspend_noirq;
> +       genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_noirq = pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq;
>         genpd->domain.ops.restore_noirq = pm_genpd_restore_noirq;

The pm_genpd_restore_noirq() doesn't invokes the lower level
->restore_noirq() callbacks. If you are going to change that for the
*poweroff* callback, certainly we should change that also for the
*restore* callbacks as well. Don't you think?

Moreover, what about the freeze and thaw callbacks, should these also
walk the lower level callbacks?

>         genpd->domain.ops.complete = pm_genpd_complete;
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>

Kind regards
Uffe
Mikko Perttunen June 21, 2017, 7:06 a.m. UTC | #2
On 20.06.2017 17:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 20 June 2017 at 15:38, Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> Currently genpd installs its own suspend_noirq, resume_noirq,
>> and poweroff_noirq callbacks, but never calls down to the driver's
>> corresponding callbacks. Add these calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Moved pm_generic_suspend_noirq to before pm_runtime_force_suspend,
>>   and correspondingly pm_generic_resume_noirq after
>>   pm_runtime_force_resume
>> - Added new pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq callback that is identical to
>>   pm_genpd_suspend_noirq but calls the appropriate driver callback
>>
>>  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> index d3f1d96f75e9..b070ee58186d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> @@ -919,6 +919,10 @@ static int pm_genpd_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>         if (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev))
>>                 return 0;
>>
>> +       ret = pm_generic_suspend_noirq(dev);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               return ret;
>> +
>>         if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
>>                 ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
>>                 if (ret)
>> @@ -961,6 +965,10 @@ static int pm_genpd_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>         if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
>>                 ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
>>
>> +       ret = pm_generic_resume_noirq(dev);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               return ret;
>> +
>>         return ret;
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -1015,6 +1023,46 @@ static int pm_genpd_thaw_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> + * pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq - Completion of hibernation of device in an
>> + *   I/O PM domain.
>> + * @dev: Device to poweroff.
>> + *
>> + * Stop the device and remove power from the domain if all devices in it have
>> + * been stopped.
>> + */
>> +static int pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +       struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>> +
>> +       genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
>> +       if (IS_ERR(genpd))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       if (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev))
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>> +       ret = pm_generic_poweroff_noirq(dev);
>
> The only difference between  pm_genpd_suspend_noirq() and
> pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq() is the above line. Can we re-factor the code
> so we avoid open code here, please.

I wasn't sure if the functions' complexity warranted adding a helper 
function, but sure, I'll refactor this with a helper function.

>
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               return ret;
>> +
>> +       if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
>> +               ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
>> +               if (ret)
>> +                       return ret;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       genpd_lock(genpd);
>> +       genpd->suspended_count++;
>> +       genpd_sync_power_off(genpd, true, 0);
>> +       genpd_unlock(genpd);
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>>   * pm_genpd_restore_noirq - Start of restore of device in an I/O PM domain.
>>   * @dev: Device to resume.
>>   *
>> @@ -1493,7 +1541,7 @@ int pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
>>         genpd->domain.ops.resume_noirq = pm_genpd_resume_noirq;
>>         genpd->domain.ops.freeze_noirq = pm_genpd_freeze_noirq;
>>         genpd->domain.ops.thaw_noirq = pm_genpd_thaw_noirq;
>> -       genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_noirq = pm_genpd_suspend_noirq;
>> +       genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_noirq = pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq;
>>         genpd->domain.ops.restore_noirq = pm_genpd_restore_noirq;
>
> The pm_genpd_restore_noirq() doesn't invokes the lower level
> ->restore_noirq() callbacks. If you are going to change that for the
> *poweroff* callback, certainly we should change that also for the
> *restore* callbacks as well. Don't you think?
>
> Moreover, what about the freeze and thaw callbacks, should these also
> walk the lower level callbacks?

Yes, I'll add the calls to the rest of the ops as well.

Thanks,
Mikko.

>
>>         genpd->domain.ops.complete = pm_genpd_complete;
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
kernel test robot June 21, 2017, 2:52 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Mikko,

[auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc6 next-20170621]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mikko-Perttunen/PM-Domains-Call-driver-s-noirq-callbacks/20170621-222245
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.3.0-18) 6.3.0 20170516
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/01org/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=sh 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/base/power/domain.c: In function 'pm_genpd_init':
>> drivers/base/power/domain.c:1544:37: error: 'pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq' undeclared (first use in this function)
     genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_noirq = pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq;
                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/base/power/domain.c:1544:37: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

vim +/pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq +1544 drivers/base/power/domain.c

  1538		genpd->domain.ops.runtime_resume = genpd_runtime_resume;
  1539		genpd->domain.ops.prepare = pm_genpd_prepare;
  1540		genpd->domain.ops.suspend_noirq = pm_genpd_suspend_noirq;
  1541		genpd->domain.ops.resume_noirq = pm_genpd_resume_noirq;
  1542		genpd->domain.ops.freeze_noirq = pm_genpd_freeze_noirq;
  1543		genpd->domain.ops.thaw_noirq = pm_genpd_thaw_noirq;
> 1544		genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_noirq = pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq;
  1545		genpd->domain.ops.restore_noirq = pm_genpd_restore_noirq;
  1546		genpd->domain.ops.complete = pm_genpd_complete;
  1547	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index d3f1d96f75e9..b070ee58186d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -919,6 +919,10 @@  static int pm_genpd_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
 	if (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev))
 		return 0;
 
+	ret = pm_generic_suspend_noirq(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
 		ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
 		if (ret)
@@ -961,6 +965,10 @@  static int pm_genpd_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
 	if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
 		ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
 
+	ret = pm_generic_resume_noirq(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1015,6 +1023,46 @@  static int pm_genpd_thaw_noirq(struct device *dev)
 }
 
 /**
+ * pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq - Completion of hibernation of device in an
+ *   I/O PM domain.
+ * @dev: Device to poweroff.
+ *
+ * Stop the device and remove power from the domain if all devices in it have
+ * been stopped.
+ */
+static int pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
+	int ret;
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
+
+	genpd = dev_to_genpd(dev);
+	if (IS_ERR(genpd))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (dev->power.wakeup_path && genpd_dev_active_wakeup(genpd, dev))
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = pm_generic_poweroff_noirq(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
+		ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	genpd_lock(genpd);
+	genpd->suspended_count++;
+	genpd_sync_power_off(genpd, true, 0);
+	genpd_unlock(genpd);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
  * pm_genpd_restore_noirq - Start of restore of device in an I/O PM domain.
  * @dev: Device to resume.
  *
@@ -1493,7 +1541,7 @@  int pm_genpd_init(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
 	genpd->domain.ops.resume_noirq = pm_genpd_resume_noirq;
 	genpd->domain.ops.freeze_noirq = pm_genpd_freeze_noirq;
 	genpd->domain.ops.thaw_noirq = pm_genpd_thaw_noirq;
-	genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_noirq = pm_genpd_suspend_noirq;
+	genpd->domain.ops.poweroff_noirq = pm_genpd_poweroff_noirq;
 	genpd->domain.ops.restore_noirq = pm_genpd_restore_noirq;
 	genpd->domain.ops.complete = pm_genpd_complete;