diff mbox

[v5,31/45] blackfin/smp: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline

Message ID 20130122074123.13822.39102.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Srivatsa S. Bhat Jan. 22, 2013, 7:41 a.m. UTC
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to
depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from
going offline from under us.

Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline,
while invoking from atomic context.

Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Bob Liu Jan. 28, 2013, 9:09 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to
> depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from
> going offline from under us.
>
> Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline,
> while invoking from atomic context.
>
> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> Cc: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
> Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
> Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thanks, will be applied to my blackfin arch tree.

> ---
>
>  arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c
> index bb61ae4..6cc6d7a 100644
> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c
> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ void send_ipi(const struct cpumask *cpumask, enum ipi_message_type msg)
>         struct ipi_data *bfin_ipi_data;
>         unsigned long flags;
>
> +       get_online_cpus_atomic();
>         local_irq_save(flags);
>         smp_mb();
>         for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
> @@ -205,6 +206,7 @@ void send_ipi(const struct cpumask *cpumask, enum ipi_message_type msg)
>         }
>
>         local_irq_restore(flags);
> +       put_online_cpus_atomic();
>  }
>
>  void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
> @@ -238,13 +240,13 @@ void smp_send_stop(void)
>  {
>         cpumask_t callmap;
>
> -       preempt_disable();
> +       get_online_cpus_atomic();
>         cpumask_copy(&callmap, cpu_online_mask);
>         cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &callmap);
>         if (!cpumask_empty(&callmap))
>                 send_ipi(&callmap, BFIN_IPI_CPU_STOP);
>
> -       preempt_enable();
> +       put_online_cpus_atomic();
>
>         return;
>  }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Tejun Heo Jan. 28, 2013, 7:06 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello, Bob.

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, will be applied to my blackfin arch tree.

I think we still have some work ahead of us to have this patchset
ready for inclusion and even then it probably would be best to route
these patches together, so probably not a very good idea to apply this
to blackfin right now.

Thanks.
Srivatsa S. Bhat Jan. 29, 2013, 1:14 a.m. UTC | #3
On 01/29/2013 06:06 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Bob.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, will be applied to my blackfin arch tree.
> 
> I think we still have some work ahead of us to have this patchset
> ready for inclusion and even then it probably would be best to route
> these patches together, so probably not a very good idea to apply this
> to blackfin right now.
> 

Thanks Tejun for pointing that out! I'll address the review comments
soon and respin the patchset.
 
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c
index bb61ae4..6cc6d7a 100644
--- a/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c
+++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@  void send_ipi(const struct cpumask *cpumask, enum ipi_message_type msg)
 	struct ipi_data *bfin_ipi_data;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	get_online_cpus_atomic();
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	smp_mb();
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
@@ -205,6 +206,7 @@  void send_ipi(const struct cpumask *cpumask, enum ipi_message_type msg)
 	}
 
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 }
 
 void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
@@ -238,13 +240,13 @@  void smp_send_stop(void)
 {
 	cpumask_t callmap;
 
-	preempt_disable();
+	get_online_cpus_atomic();
 	cpumask_copy(&callmap, cpu_online_mask);
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &callmap);
 	if (!cpumask_empty(&callmap))
 		send_ipi(&callmap, BFIN_IPI_CPU_STOP);
 
-	preempt_enable();
+	put_online_cpus_atomic();
 
 	return;
 }