@@ -540,14 +540,14 @@ static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
info->usb = power_supply_register(&pdev->dev, &usb_desc, &psy_cfg);
if (IS_ERR(info->usb)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(info->usb);
- goto out_usb;
+ goto out_unregister_ac;
}
info->usb->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
info->battery = power_supply_register(&pdev->dev, &battery_desc, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(info->battery)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(info->battery);
- goto out_battery;
+ goto out_unregister_usb;
}
info->battery->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
@@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
max8925_init_charger(chip, info);
return 0;
-out_battery:
- power_supply_unregister(info->battery);
-out_usb:
+out_unregister_usb:
+ power_supply_unregister(info->usb);
+out_unregister_ac:
power_supply_unregister(info->ac);
out:
return ret;
We were freeing "info->battery" instead of "info->usb", which leads to an OOps and a resource leak. The labels were wonky, "out_battery" did release the battery but out_usb did not release usb. I was introducing a call to free usb so it sort conflicted with existing misleading name. I renamed them. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html