From patchwork Tue May 24 12:53:23 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mika Westerberg X-Patchwork-Id: 9133487 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539F8607D3 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A55828236 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 3EC1A28287; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:53:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B5B28236 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932695AbcEXMxb (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2016 08:53:31 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:62443 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751865AbcEXMxa (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2016 08:53:30 -0400 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 May 2016 05:53:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,359,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="983628374" Received: from lahna.fi.intel.com (HELO lahna) ([10.237.72.157]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 24 May 2016 05:53:26 -0700 Received: by lahna (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 24 May 2016 15:53:23 +0300 Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 15:53:23 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Peter Wu , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lukas Wunner , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Valdis Kletnieks , Dave Airlie Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Power on bridges before scanning new devices Message-ID: <20160524125323.GE1789@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20160519231234.GB1785@al> <1463991648-85051-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20160523200042.GB24375@localhost> <20160523215015.GA31479@localhost> <20160524122357.GA20453@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160524122357.GA20453@localhost> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 07:23:57AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 04:50:15PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [+cc Valdis, Dave] > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:00:42PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:20:48AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > When a PCI device is removed through sysfs interface the upstream bridge > > > > (PCIe port) can be runtime suspended if it was the last device on that bus. > > > > Now, if the bridge is in D3 we cannot find devices below the bridge > > > > anymore. For example following fails to find the removed device again: > > > > > > > > # echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:01.0/0000:01:00.0/remove > > > > # echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:01.0/rescan > > > > > > > > Where 0000:00:01.0 is the bridge device. > > > > > > > > In order to be able to rescan devices below the bridge add > > > > pm_runtime_get_sync()/pm_runtime_put() calls to pci_scan_bridge(). This > > > > should keep bridges powered on while their children devices are being > > > > scanned. > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Peter Wu > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg > > > > > > This looks like basically the same idea as "ACPI / hotplug / PCI: > > > Runtime resume bridge before rescan". > > > > > > The hotplug_event() path modified by that patch eventually calls > > > pci_scan_bridge(): > > > > > > hotplug_event > > > enable_slot > > > pci_scan_bridge > > > > > > so this patch looks a little more general. Does it make "ACPI / > > > hotplug / PCI: Runtime resume bridge before rescan" unnecessary? > > > Can I just replace that patch with this one? > > > > I speculatively replaced "ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Runtime resume bridge > > before rescan" with this one and pushed the result to > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/log/?h=pci/pm > > > > Please take a look, test it, and let me know if I need to add the ACPI > > patch back. > > > > This branch also includes the fix for the lockdep splat reported by > > Valdis. This is what I hope to get into v4.7-rc1. > > Ping? I'd like to ask Linus to pull this pci/pm branch before v4.7-rc1. > It currently has these changes: > > 8b71f5652eea PCI: Add runtime PM support for PCIe ports > af81f0fa638b PCI: Power on bridges before scanning new devices > 9741a01c9f55 PCI: Put PCIe ports into D3 during suspend > b3a63ff7baf1 PCI: Don't clear d3cold_allowed for PCIe ports Looks good to me. I've also tested those here and seems to work fine. > I dropped "ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Runtime resume bridge before rescan" > on the assumption that "PCI: Power on bridges before scanning new > devices" is sufficient to cover both the ACPI and the generic PCi > rescan cases, but I'd like some reassurance about that. I agree with your reasoning that the patch should not be needed anymore. However, I have the machine which needed that patch at home so I'm not able to test it now. I'll do that later today when I get back home. One thing I noticed, though. When a bridge is transitioned to D0 we only wait for 10ms which is requirement for PCI functions. However, PCI PM specification 1.2 (chapter 4.2) requires that for buses to transition from B2 to B0 we need to wait minimum of 50ms before accessing a function on that bus. We even have PCI_PM_BUS_WAIT defined in include/linux/pci.h but it is not used anywhere. Maybe it was not needed originally because we never powered down bridges anyway but now when we do, I think it is good idea to do what the spec requires. What do you think? We could add a separate patch doing something like below to make sure the spec is followed. --- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index e785dc260e72..b3b794caa380 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c @@ -2361,7 +2361,12 @@ void pci_pm_init(struct pci_dev *dev) } dev->pm_cap = pm; - dev->d3_delay = PCI_PM_D3_WAIT; + /* + * PCI PM 1.2 specification requires minimum of 50ms before any + * function on the bus is accessed after the bus is transitioned + * from B2 to B0. + */ + dev->d3_delay = pci_is_bridge(dev) ? PCI_PM_BUS_WAIT : PCI_PM_D3_WAIT; dev->d3cold_delay = PCI_PM_D3COLD_WAIT; dev->bridge_d3 = pci_bridge_d3_possible(dev); dev->d3cold_allowed = true;