Message ID | 20170213204322.27588-1-tony@atomide.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Mainlined |
Delegated to: | Rafael Wysocki |
Headers | show |
On Monday, February 13, 2017 12:43:22 PM Tony Lindgren wrote: > From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> > > There are two reasons for reporting wakeup event when dedicated wakeup > IRQ is triggered: > > - wakeup events accounting, so proper statistical data will be > displayed in sysfs and debugfs; > > - there are small window when System is entering suspend during which > dedicated wakeup IRQ can be lost: > > dpm_suspend_noirq() > |- device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs() > |- dev_pm_arm_wake_irq(X) > |- IRQ is enabled and marked as wakeup source > [1]... > |- suspend_device_irqs() > |- suspend_device_irq(X) > |- irqd_set(X, IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED); > |- wakup IRQ armed > > The wakeup IRQ can be lost if it's triggered at point [1] > and not armed yet. > > Hence, fix above cases by adding simple pm_wakeup_event() call in > handle_threaded_wake_irq(). > > Fixes: 4990d4fe327b ("PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ > handling") > Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> > Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> > Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> > [tony@atomide.com: added missing return to avoid warnings] > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Applied (along with the other two wakeirq fixes). Thanks, Rafael
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c @@ -141,6 +141,13 @@ static irqreturn_t handle_threaded_wake_irq(int irq, void *_wirq) struct wake_irq *wirq = _wirq; int res; + /* Maybe abort suspend? */ + if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(irq_get_irq_data(irq))) { + pm_wakeup_event(wirq->dev, 0); + + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } + /* We don't want RPM_ASYNC or RPM_NOWAIT here */ res = pm_runtime_resume(wirq->dev); if (res < 0)