diff mbox

[v6,11/11] thermal: armada: Give meaningful names to the thermal zones

Message ID 20171222093226.23456-12-miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Miquel Raynal Dec. 22, 2017, 9:32 a.m. UTC
After registration to the thermal core, sysfs will make one entry
per instance of the driver in /sys/class/thermal_zoneX and
/sys/class/hwmon/hwmonX, X being the index of the instance, all of them
having the type/name "armada_thermal".

Until now there was only one thermal zone per SoC but SoCs like Armada
A7K and Armada A8K have respectively two and three thermal zones (one
per AP and one per CP) and this number is subject to grow in the future.

Use dev_name() instead of the "armada_thermal" string to get a
meaningful name and be able to identify the thermal zones from
userspace.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Gregory CLEMENT Dec. 22, 2017, 3:36 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Miquel,
 
 On ven., déc. 22 2017, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> After registration to the thermal core, sysfs will make one entry
> per instance of the driver in /sys/class/thermal_zoneX and
> /sys/class/hwmon/hwmonX, X being the index of the instance, all of them
> having the type/name "armada_thermal".
>
> Until now there was only one thermal zone per SoC but SoCs like Armada
> A7K and Armada A8K have respectively two and three thermal zones (one
> per AP and one per CP) and this number is subject to grow in the future.
>
> Use dev_name() instead of the "armada_thermal" string to get a
> meaningful name and be able to identify the thermal zones from
> userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

And here I also tested that when all the series was applied there was no
regression on an Armada XP based board: PlatHome OpenBlocks AX3-4, and
on an Armada 388 one: SolidRun Clearfog A1. hera again for both of them
it was OK:

Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

Gregory

> ---
>  drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> index ea958e651312..454137f78eb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> @@ -406,8 +406,8 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	priv->data->init_sensor(pdev, priv);
>  
> -	thermal = thermal_zone_device_register("armada_thermal", 0, 0,
> -					       priv, &ops, NULL, 0, 0);
> +	thermal = thermal_zone_device_register(dev_name(&pdev->dev), 0, 0, priv,
> +					       &ops, NULL, 0, 0);
>  	if (IS_ERR(thermal)) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>  			"Failed to register thermal zone device\n");
> -- 
> 2.11.0
>
Miquel Raynal Dec. 22, 2017, 3:51 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello Gregory,

On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:36:04 +0100
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> Hi Miquel,
>  
>  On ven., déc. 22 2017, Miquel Raynal
> <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
> > After registration to the thermal core, sysfs will make one entry
> > per instance of the driver in /sys/class/thermal_zoneX and
> > /sys/class/hwmon/hwmonX, X being the index of the instance, all of
> > them having the type/name "armada_thermal".
> >
> > Until now there was only one thermal zone per SoC but SoCs like
> > Armada A7K and Armada A8K have respectively two and three thermal
> > zones (one per AP and one per CP) and this number is subject to
> > grow in the future.
> >
> > Use dev_name() instead of the "armada_thermal" string to get a
> > meaningful name and be able to identify the thermal zones from
> > userspace.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>  
> 
> And here I also tested that when all the series was applied there was
> no regression on an Armada XP based board: PlatHome OpenBlocks AX3-4,
> and on an Armada 388 one: SolidRun Clearfog A1. hera again for both
> of them it was OK:

Thank you for testing, on my side I checked the last version (minor
changes) with both an Armada-385-AP and an Armada-8040-DB.

I will resend the series very soon.

Thanks,
Miquèl

> 
> Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> 
> Gregory
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c index ea958e651312..454137f78eb3
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
> > @@ -406,8 +406,8 @@ static int armada_thermal_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev) 
> >  	priv->data->init_sensor(pdev, priv);
> >  
> > -	thermal = thermal_zone_device_register("armada_thermal",
> > 0, 0,
> > -					       priv, &ops, NULL,
> > 0, 0);
> > +	thermal =
> > thermal_zone_device_register(dev_name(&pdev->dev), 0, 0, priv,
> > +					       &ops, NULL, 0, 0);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(thermal)) {
> >  		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >  			"Failed to register thermal zone
> > device\n"); -- 
> > 2.11.0
> >  
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
index ea958e651312..454137f78eb3 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
@@ -406,8 +406,8 @@  static int armada_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	priv->data->init_sensor(pdev, priv);
 
-	thermal = thermal_zone_device_register("armada_thermal", 0, 0,
-					       priv, &ops, NULL, 0, 0);
+	thermal = thermal_zone_device_register(dev_name(&pdev->dev), 0, 0, priv,
+					       &ops, NULL, 0, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(thermal)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
 			"Failed to register thermal zone device\n");