[v3,02/12] PM / devfreq: Fix handling of min/max_freq == 0

Commit Message

Matthias Kaehlcke June 14, 2018, 7:47 p.m. UTC

Commit ab8f58ad72c4 ("PM / devfreq: Set min/max_freq when adding the
devfreq device") initializes df->min/max_freq with the min/max OPP when
the device is added. Later commit f1d981eaecf8 ("PM / devfreq: Use the
available min/max frequency") adds df->scaling_min/max_freq and the
following to the frequency adjustment code:

  max_freq = MIN(devfreq->scaling_max_freq, devfreq->max_freq);

With the current handling of min/max_freq this is incorrect:

Even though df->max_freq is now initialized to a value != 0 user space
can still set it to 0, in this case max_freq would be 0 instead of
df->scaling_max_freq as intended. In consequence the frequency adjustment
is not performed:

  if (max_freq && freq > max_freq) {
	freq = max_freq;

To fix this set df->min/max freq to the min/max OPP in max/max_freq_store,
when the user passes a value of 0. This also prevents df->max_freq from
being set below the min OPP when df->min_freq is 0, and similar for
min_freq. Since it is now guaranteed that df->min/max_freq can't be 0 the
checks for this case can be removed.

Fixes: f1d981eaecf8 ("PM / devfreq: Use the available min/max frequency")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[e-mail]>
---
Changes in v3:
- none

Changes in v2:
- handle freq tables sorted in ascending and descending order in
  min/max_freq_store()
- use same order for conditional statements in min/max_freq_store()

 drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Brian Norris June 18, 2018, 8:12 p.m. UTC | #1

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:47:02PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Commit ab8f58ad72c4 ("PM / devfreq: Set min/max_freq when adding the
> devfreq device") initializes df->min/max_freq with the min/max OPP when
> the device is added. Later commit f1d981eaecf8 ("PM / devfreq: Use the
> available min/max frequency") adds df->scaling_min/max_freq and the
> following to the frequency adjustment code:
> 
>   max_freq = MIN(devfreq->scaling_max_freq, devfreq->max_freq);
> 
> With the current handling of min/max_freq this is incorrect:
> 
> Even though df->max_freq is now initialized to a value != 0 user space
> can still set it to 0, in this case max_freq would be 0 instead of
> df->scaling_max_freq as intended. In consequence the frequency adjustment
> is not performed:
> 
>   if (max_freq && freq > max_freq) {
> 	freq = max_freq;
> 
> To fix this set df->min/max freq to the min/max OPP in max/max_freq_store,
> when the user passes a value of 0. This also prevents df->max_freq from
> being set below the min OPP when df->min_freq is 0, and similar for
> min_freq. Since it is now guaranteed that df->min/max_freq can't be 0 the
> checks for this case can be removed.
> 
> Fixes: f1d981eaecf8 ("PM / devfreq: Use the available min/max frequency")
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[e-mail]>

FWIW, I've reviewed patches 1-9 (the core devfreq bugfixes and features,
and a small cpufreq helper fixup), and they seem pretty clear and good
to me, aside from a minor error in the current subject
(s/devfreg/devfreq/). So:

Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <[e-mail]>

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index 0057ef5b0a98..6f604f8b2b81 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -283,11 +283,11 @@  int update_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq)
 	max_freq = MIN(devfreq->scaling_max_freq, devfreq->max_freq);
 	min_freq = MAX(devfreq->scaling_min_freq, devfreq->min_freq);
 
-	if (min_freq && freq < min_freq) {
+	if (freq < min_freq) {
 		freq = min_freq;
 		flags &= ~DEVFREQ_FLAG_LEAST_UPPER_BOUND; /* Use GLB */
 	}
-	if (max_freq && freq > max_freq) {
+	if (freq > max_freq) {
 		freq = max_freq;
 		flags |= DEVFREQ_FLAG_LEAST_UPPER_BOUND; /* Use LUB */
 	}
@@ -1122,18 +1122,27 @@  static ssize_t min_freq_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 {
 	struct devfreq *df = to_devfreq(dev);
 	unsigned long value;
+	unsigned long *freq_table;
 	int ret;
-	unsigned long max;
 
 	ret = sscanf(buf, "%lu", &value);
 	if (ret != 1)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&df->lock);
-	max = df->max_freq;
-	if (value && max && value > max) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto unlock;
+
+	if (value) {
+		if (value > df->max_freq) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+	} else {
+		freq_table = df->profile->freq_table;
+		/* typical order is ascending, some drivers use descending */
+		if (freq_table[0] < freq_table[df->profile->max_state - 1])
+			value = freq_table[0];
+		else
+			value = freq_table[df->profile->max_state - 1];
 	}
 
 	df->min_freq = value;
@@ -1157,18 +1166,27 @@  static ssize_t max_freq_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 {
 	struct devfreq *df = to_devfreq(dev);
 	unsigned long value;
+	unsigned long *freq_table;
 	int ret;
-	unsigned long min;
 
 	ret = sscanf(buf, "%lu", &value);
 	if (ret != 1)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&df->lock);
-	min = df->min_freq;
-	if (value && min && value < min) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto unlock;
+
+	if (value) {
+		if (value < df->min_freq) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto unlock;
+		}
+	} else {
+		freq_table = df->profile->freq_table;
+		/* typical order is ascending, some drivers use descending */
+		if (freq_table[0] < freq_table[df->profile->max_state - 1])
+			value = freq_table[df->profile->max_state - 1];
+		else
+			value = freq_table[0];
 	}
 
 	df->max_freq = value;