From patchwork Fri Feb 8 10:05:48 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Patrick Bellasi X-Patchwork-Id: 10802633 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D6614E1 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947C02DC81 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 878562DCD4; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:07:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E65C2DC81 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727760AbfBHKGs (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 05:06:48 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:47604 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727733AbfBHKGn (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 05:06:43 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC7AA78; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 02:06:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from e110439-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e110439-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 460043F557; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 02:06:40 -0800 (PST) From: Patrick Bellasi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan Subject: [PATCH v7 09/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with() Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:05:48 +0000 Message-Id: <20190208100554.32196-10-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190208100554.32196-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> References: <20190208100554.32196-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Currently uclamp_util() allows to clamp a specified utilization considering the clamp values requested by RUNNABLE tasks in a CPU. Sometimes however, it could be interesting to verify how clamp values will change when a task is going to be running on a given CPU. For example, the Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS) is interested in evaluating and comparing the energy impact of different scheduling decisions. Add uclamp_util_with() which allows to clamp a given utilization by considering the possible impact on CPU clamp values of a specified task. Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra --- kernel/sched/sched.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index f07048a0e845..de181b8a3a2a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -2278,11 +2278,20 @@ static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags) {} #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */ #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK -static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util) +unsigned int uclamp_effective_value(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id); + +static __always_inline +unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util, + struct task_struct *p) { unsigned int min_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value); unsigned int max_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value); + if (p) { + min_util = max(min_util, uclamp_effective_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN)); + max_util = max(max_util, uclamp_effective_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX)); + } + /* * Since CPU's {min,max}_util clamps are MAX aggregated considering * RUNNABLE tasks with _different_ clamps, we can end up with an @@ -2293,7 +2302,17 @@ static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util) return clamp(util, min_util, max_util); } + +static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util) +{ + return uclamp_util_with(rq, util, NULL); +} #else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ +static inline unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util, + struct task_struct *p) +{ + return util; +} static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util) { return util;