| Message ID | 20190722153745.32446-6-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ARM: psci: cpuidle: PSCI CPUidle rework | expand |
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Allow selection of the PSCI CPUidle in the kernel by adding > the required Kconfig options. > > Remove PSCI callbacks from ARM/ARM64 generic CPU ops > to prevent the PSCI idle driver from clashing with the generic > ARM CPUidle driver initialization, that relies on CPU ops > to initialize and enter idle states. > > Update the affected defconfig files to guarantee seamingless > transition from the generic ARM CPUidle to the PSCI CPUidle > driver on arch/platforms using it. > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> > --- > arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + Better to keep above you as separate patch, though it may cause minor issues from bisectibility. It may be needed anyway for merging. > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 7 ++++--- > arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 4 ---- > drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 8 ++++++-- > drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 9 --------- > 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > index a53b29251ed4..4174fd1b79e7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ=y > CONFIG_ARM_IMX_CPUFREQ_DT=y > CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y > CONFIG_ARM_CPUIDLE=y > +CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_CPUIDLE=y > CONFIG_VFP=y > CONFIG_NEON=y > CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y > diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > index 0e58ef02880c..c0a7cfe3aebd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y > CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y > CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT=y > CONFIG_ARM_CPUIDLE=y > +CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_CPUIDLE=y > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=y > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c > index d1048173fd8a..4bcd1bca0dfc 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include <linux/cpu_pm.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/of_device.h> > +#include <linux/psci.h> > > #include <asm/cpuidle.h> > #include <asm/cpu_ops.h> > @@ -48,15 +49,15 @@ int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index) > > int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu) > { > - return arm_cpuidle_init(cpu); > + return psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu); This will break build as psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle is introduced in next patch. You can simply move it to next patch I assume. > } > > int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi) > { > if (ARM64_LPI_IS_RETENTION_STATE(lpi->arch_flags)) > - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION(arm_cpuidle_suspend, > + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, > lpi->index); > else > - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(arm_cpuidle_suspend, lpi->index); > + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, lpi->index); > } > #endif > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c > index 85ee7d07889e..a543ab7e007c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c > @@ -105,10 +105,6 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) > > const struct cpu_operations cpu_psci_ops = { > .name = "psci", > -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE > - .cpu_init_idle = psci_cpu_init_idle, > - .cpu_suspend = psci_cpu_suspend_enter, > -#endif > .cpu_init = cpu_psci_cpu_init, > .cpu_prepare = cpu_psci_cpu_prepare, > .cpu_boot = cpu_psci_cpu_boot, > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm > index 929b57424ea4..b9c56c60ab98 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm > @@ -14,8 +14,12 @@ config ARM_CPUIDLE > provided by architecture code. > > config ARM_PSCI_CPUIDLE > - bool > - > + bool "PSCI CPU idle Driver" As mentioned in previous patch, do you see issues having just above change in this patch and the below ones moved to the previous. > + depends on ARM_PSCI_FW > + select DT_IDLE_STATES > + select CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS > + help > + Select this to enable PSCI firmware based CPUidle driver for ARM. You need extra blank line here. -- Regards, Sudeep
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:16:24PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > Allow selection of the PSCI CPUidle in the kernel by adding > > the required Kconfig options. > > > > Remove PSCI callbacks from ARM/ARM64 generic CPU ops > > to prevent the PSCI idle driver from clashing with the generic > > ARM CPUidle driver initialization, that relies on CPU ops > > to initialize and enter idle states. > > > > Update the affected defconfig files to guarantee seamingless > > transition from the generic ARM CPUidle to the PSCI CPUidle > > driver on arch/platforms using it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> > > --- > > arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + > > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + > > Better to keep above you as separate patch, though it may cause > minor issues from bisectibility. It may be needed anyway for merging. That's a good point, I will split these bits in a separate patch. > > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 7 ++++--- > > arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 4 ---- > > drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 8 ++++++-- > > drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 9 --------- > > 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > > index a53b29251ed4..4174fd1b79e7 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig > > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ=y > > CONFIG_ARM_IMX_CPUFREQ_DT=y > > CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y > > CONFIG_ARM_CPUIDLE=y > > +CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_CPUIDLE=y > > CONFIG_VFP=y > > CONFIG_NEON=y > > CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > > index 0e58ef02880c..c0a7cfe3aebd 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y > > CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y > > CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT=y > > CONFIG_ARM_CPUIDLE=y > > +CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_CPUIDLE=y > > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y > > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=y > > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c > > index d1048173fd8a..4bcd1bca0dfc 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > > #include <linux/cpu_pm.h> > > #include <linux/of.h> > > #include <linux/of_device.h> > > +#include <linux/psci.h> > > > > #include <asm/cpuidle.h> > > #include <asm/cpu_ops.h> > > @@ -48,15 +49,15 @@ int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index) > > > > int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu) > > { > > - return arm_cpuidle_init(cpu); > > + return psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu); > > This will break build as psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle is introduced in next patch. > You can simply move it to next patch I assume. Yes, it is a bisectability issue, I fixed it already but thanks for spotting it anyway. > > } > > > > int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi) > > { > > if (ARM64_LPI_IS_RETENTION_STATE(lpi->arch_flags)) > > - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION(arm_cpuidle_suspend, > > + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, > > lpi->index); > > else > > - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(arm_cpuidle_suspend, lpi->index); > > + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, lpi->index); > > } > > #endif > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c > > index 85ee7d07889e..a543ab7e007c 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c > > @@ -105,10 +105,6 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) > > > > const struct cpu_operations cpu_psci_ops = { > > .name = "psci", > > -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE > > - .cpu_init_idle = psci_cpu_init_idle, > > - .cpu_suspend = psci_cpu_suspend_enter, > > -#endif > > .cpu_init = cpu_psci_cpu_init, > > .cpu_prepare = cpu_psci_cpu_prepare, > > .cpu_boot = cpu_psci_cpu_boot, > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm > > index 929b57424ea4..b9c56c60ab98 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm > > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm > > @@ -14,8 +14,12 @@ config ARM_CPUIDLE > > provided by architecture code. > > > > config ARM_PSCI_CPUIDLE > > - bool > > - > > + bool "PSCI CPU idle Driver" > > As mentioned in previous patch, do you see issues having just above > change in this patch and the below ones moved to the previous. No you are right, I will make this change. > > + depends on ARM_PSCI_FW > > + select DT_IDLE_STATES > > + select CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS > > + help > > + Select this to enable PSCI firmware based CPUidle driver for ARM. > > You need extra blank line here. OK. Thanks, Lorenzo
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig index a53b29251ed4..4174fd1b79e7 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ=y CONFIG_ARM_IMX_CPUFREQ_DT=y CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y CONFIG_ARM_CPUIDLE=y +CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_CPUIDLE=y CONFIG_VFP=y CONFIG_NEON=y CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig index 0e58ef02880c..c0a7cfe3aebd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_ARM_CPUIDLE=y +CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_CPUIDLE=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c index d1048173fd8a..4bcd1bca0dfc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include <linux/cpu_pm.h> #include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/psci.h> #include <asm/cpuidle.h> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h> @@ -48,15 +49,15 @@ int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index) int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu) { - return arm_cpuidle_init(cpu); + return psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu); } int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi) { if (ARM64_LPI_IS_RETENTION_STATE(lpi->arch_flags)) - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION(arm_cpuidle_suspend, + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, lpi->index); else - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(arm_cpuidle_suspend, lpi->index); + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, lpi->index); } #endif diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c index 85ee7d07889e..a543ab7e007c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c @@ -105,10 +105,6 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) const struct cpu_operations cpu_psci_ops = { .name = "psci", -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE - .cpu_init_idle = psci_cpu_init_idle, - .cpu_suspend = psci_cpu_suspend_enter, -#endif .cpu_init = cpu_psci_cpu_init, .cpu_prepare = cpu_psci_cpu_prepare, .cpu_boot = cpu_psci_cpu_boot, diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm index 929b57424ea4..b9c56c60ab98 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm @@ -14,8 +14,12 @@ config ARM_CPUIDLE provided by architecture code. config ARM_PSCI_CPUIDLE - bool - + bool "PSCI CPU idle Driver" + depends on ARM_PSCI_FW + select DT_IDLE_STATES + select CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS + help + Select this to enable PSCI firmware based CPUidle driver for ARM. config ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUIDLE bool "Support for ARM big.LITTLE processors" depends on ARCH_VEXPRESS_TC2_PM || ARCH_EXYNOS diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c index f82ccd39a913..bae734d13a52 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c @@ -436,15 +436,6 @@ int psci_cpu_suspend_enter(unsigned long index) return ret; } - -/* ARM specific CPU idle operations */ -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM -static const struct cpuidle_ops psci_cpuidle_ops __initconst = { - .suspend = psci_cpu_suspend_enter, - .init = psci_dt_cpu_init_idle, -}; - -CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(psci, "psci", &psci_cpuidle_ops); #endif #endif
Allow selection of the PSCI CPUidle in the kernel by adding the required Kconfig options. Remove PSCI callbacks from ARM/ARM64 generic CPU ops to prevent the PSCI idle driver from clashing with the generic ARM CPUidle driver initialization, that relies on CPU ops to initialize and enter idle states. Update the affected defconfig files to guarantee seamingless transition from the generic ARM CPUidle to the PSCI CPUidle driver on arch/platforms using it. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> --- arch/arm/configs/imx_v6_v7_defconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 7 ++++--- arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 4 ---- drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 8 ++++++-- drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 9 --------- 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)