From patchwork Sat Mar 21 11:26:00 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Gleixner X-Patchwork-Id: 11450911 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE2C913 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF8A20754 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728686AbgCULf2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:35:28 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:38513 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728617AbgCULfD (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:35:03 -0400 Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jFcOa-0002G3-Hx; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:34:28 +0100 Received: from nanos.tec.linutronix.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7261040C7; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:34:21 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20200321113242.317954042@linutronix.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:26:00 +0100 From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Sebastian Siewior , Linus Torvalds , Joel Fernandes , Oleg Nesterov , Davidlohr Bueso , Davidlohr Bueso , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Logan Gunthorpe , Bjorn Helgaas , Kurt Schwemmer , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kbuild test robot , Nick Hu , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Guo Ren , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Brian Cain , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek , Michael Ellerman , Arnd Bergmann , Geoff Levand , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Paul E . McKenney" , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap Subject: [patch V3 16/20] completion: Use simple wait queues References: <20200321112544.878032781@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8-bit X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Gleixner completion uses a wait_queue_head_t to enqueue waiters. wait_queue_head_t contains a spinlock_t to protect the list of waiters which excludes it from being used in truly atomic context on a PREEMPT_RT enabled kernel. The spinlock in the wait queue head cannot be replaced by a raw_spinlock because: - wait queues can have custom wakeup callbacks, which acquire other spinlock_t locks and have potentially long execution times - wake_up() walks an unbounded number of list entries during the wake up and may wake an unbounded number of waiters. For simplicity and performance reasons complete() should be usable on PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels. completions do not use custom wakeup callbacks and are usually single waiter, except for a few corner cases. Replace the wait queue in the completion with a simple wait queue (swait), which uses a raw_spinlock_t for protecting the waiter list and therefore is safe to use inside truly atomic regions on PREEMPT_RT. There is no semantical or functional change: - completions use the exclusive wait mode which is what swait provides - complete() wakes one exclusive waiter - complete_all() wakes all waiters while holding the lock which protects the wait queue against newly incoming waiters. The conversion to swait preserves this behaviour. complete_all() might cause unbound latencies with a large number of waiters being woken at once, but most complete_all() usage sites are either in testing or initialization code or have only a really small number of concurrent waiters which for now does not cause a latency problem. Keep it simple for now. The fixup of the warning check in the USB gadget driver is just a straight forward conversion of the lockless waiter check from one waitqueue type to the other. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Acked-by: Linus Torvalds --- V2: Split out the orinoco and usb gadget parts and amended change log --- drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c | 2 +- include/linux/completion.h | 8 ++++---- kernel/sched/completion.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++----------------- 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c @@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ static void ffs_data_put(struct ffs_data pr_info("%s(): freeing\n", __func__); ffs_data_clear(ffs); BUG_ON(waitqueue_active(&ffs->ev.waitq) || - waitqueue_active(&ffs->ep0req_completion.wait) || + swait_active(&ffs->ep0req_completion.wait) || waitqueue_active(&ffs->wait)); destroy_workqueue(ffs->io_completion_wq); kfree(ffs->dev_name); --- a/include/linux/completion.h +++ b/include/linux/completion.h @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ * See kernel/sched/completion.c for details. */ -#include +#include /* * struct completion - structure used to maintain state for a "completion" @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ */ struct completion { unsigned int done; - wait_queue_head_t wait; + struct swait_queue_head wait; }; #define init_completion_map(x, m) __init_completion(x) @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static inline void complete_acquire(stru static inline void complete_release(struct completion *x) {} #define COMPLETION_INITIALIZER(work) \ - { 0, __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER((work).wait) } + { 0, __SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER((work).wait) } #define COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK_MAP(work, map) \ (*({ init_completion_map(&(work), &(map)); &(work); })) @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static inline void complete_release(stru static inline void __init_completion(struct completion *x) { x->done = 0; - init_waitqueue_head(&x->wait); + init_swait_queue_head(&x->wait); } /** --- a/kernel/sched/completion.c +++ b/kernel/sched/completion.c @@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ void complete(struct completion *x) { unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags); if (x->done != UINT_MAX) x->done++; - __wake_up_locked(&x->wait, TASK_NORMAL, 1); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags); + swake_up_locked(&x->wait); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(complete); @@ -58,10 +58,12 @@ void complete_all(struct completion *x) { unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags); + WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()); + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags); x->done = UINT_MAX; - __wake_up_locked(&x->wait, TASK_NORMAL, 0); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags); + swake_up_all_locked(&x->wait); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(complete_all); @@ -70,20 +72,20 @@ do_wait_for_common(struct completion *x, long (*action)(long), long timeout, int state) { if (!x->done) { - DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); + DECLARE_SWAITQUEUE(wait); - __add_wait_queue_entry_tail_exclusive(&x->wait, &wait); do { if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) { timeout = -ERESTARTSYS; break; } + __prepare_to_swait(&x->wait, &wait); __set_current_state(state); - spin_unlock_irq(&x->wait.lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&x->wait.lock); timeout = action(timeout); - spin_lock_irq(&x->wait.lock); + raw_spin_lock_irq(&x->wait.lock); } while (!x->done && timeout); - __remove_wait_queue(&x->wait, &wait); + __finish_swait(&x->wait, &wait); if (!x->done) return timeout; } @@ -100,9 +102,9 @@ static inline long __sched complete_acquire(x); - spin_lock_irq(&x->wait.lock); + raw_spin_lock_irq(&x->wait.lock); timeout = do_wait_for_common(x, action, timeout, state); - spin_unlock_irq(&x->wait.lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&x->wait.lock); complete_release(x); @@ -291,12 +293,12 @@ bool try_wait_for_completion(struct comp if (!READ_ONCE(x->done)) return false; - spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags); if (!x->done) ret = false; else if (x->done != UINT_MAX) x->done--; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_wait_for_completion); @@ -322,8 +324,8 @@ bool completion_done(struct completion * * otherwise we can end up freeing the completion before complete() * is done referencing it. */ - spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags); return true; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(completion_done);