diff mbox series

[RFC,net-next,05/12] reset: lan966x: Add switch reset driver

Message ID 20210920095218.1108151-6-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com (mailing list archive)
State RFC, archived
Headers show
Series Add lan966x driver | expand

Commit Message

Horatiu Vultur Sept. 20, 2021, 9:52 a.m. UTC
The lan966x switch SoC has a number of components that can be reset
indiviually, but at least the switch core needs to be in a well defined
state at power on, when any of the lan966x drivers starts to access the
switch core, this reset driver is available.

The reset driver is loaded early via the postcore_initcall interface, and
will then be available for the other lan966x drivers (SGPIO, SwitchDev etc)
that are loaded next, and the first of them to be loaded can perform the
one-time switch core reset that is needed.

Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/reset/Kconfig         |   8 +++
 drivers/reset/Makefile        |   1 +
 drivers/reset/reset-lan966x.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/reset/reset-lan966x.c

Comments

Andrew Lunn Sept. 20, 2021, 12:11 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The lan966x switch SoC has a number of components that can be reset
> indiviually, but at least the switch core needs to be in a well defined
> state at power on, when any of the lan966x drivers starts to access the
> switch core, this reset driver is available.
> 
> The reset driver is loaded early via the postcore_initcall interface, and
> will then be available for the other lan966x drivers (SGPIO, SwitchDev etc)
> that are loaded next, and the first of them to be loaded can perform the
> one-time switch core reset that is needed.

A lot of this looks very similar to
reset-microchip-sparx5.c. PROTECT_REG is 0x88 rather than 0x84, but
actually using the value is the same. SOFT_RESET_REG is identical.  So
rather than adding a new driver, maybe you can generalize
reset-microchip-sparx5.c, and add a second compatible string?

	Andrew
Horatiu Vultur Sept. 22, 2021, 9:59 a.m. UTC | #2
The 09/20/2021 14:11, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > The lan966x switch SoC has a number of components that can be reset
> > indiviually, but at least the switch core needs to be in a well defined
> > state at power on, when any of the lan966x drivers starts to access the
> > switch core, this reset driver is available.
> >
> > The reset driver is loaded early via the postcore_initcall interface, and
> > will then be available for the other lan966x drivers (SGPIO, SwitchDev etc)
> > that are loaded next, and the first of them to be loaded can perform the
> > one-time switch core reset that is needed.
> 
> A lot of this looks very similar to
> reset-microchip-sparx5.c. PROTECT_REG is 0x88 rather than 0x84, but
> actually using the value is the same. SOFT_RESET_REG is identical.  So
> rather than adding a new driver, maybe you can generalize
> reset-microchip-sparx5.c, and add a second compatible string?

You are right, they look similar.
I will try to add a new compatible string.

> 
>         Andrew
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
index be799a5abf8a..93f19303ebac 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/reset/Kconfig
@@ -108,6 +108,14 @@  config RESET_LANTIQ
 	help
 	  This enables the reset controller driver for Lantiq / Intel XWAY SoCs.
 
+config RESET_LAN966X
+	bool "Microchip LAN966X Reset Driver"
+	depends on HAS_IOMEM || COMPILE_TEST
+	default y if LAN966X_SWITCH
+	select MFD_SYSCON
+	help
+	  This driver supports switch core reset for the Microchip LAN966X SoC.
+
 config RESET_LPC18XX
 	bool "LPC18xx/43xx Reset Driver" if COMPILE_TEST
 	default ARCH_LPC18XX
diff --git a/drivers/reset/Makefile b/drivers/reset/Makefile
index 21d46d8869ff..3358f491e617 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/reset/Makefile
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@  obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_HSDK) += reset-hsdk.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_IMX7) += reset-imx7.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_INTEL_GW) += reset-intel-gw.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_K210) += reset-k210.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_LAN966X) += reset-lan966x.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_LANTIQ) += reset-lantiq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_LPC18XX) += reset-lpc18xx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_MCHP_SPARX5) += reset-microchip-sparx5.o
diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-lan966x.c b/drivers/reset/reset-lan966x.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3d4fe31653db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/reset/reset-lan966x.c
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Microchip Technology Inc. and its subsidiaries. */
+
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
+
+#define PROTECT_REG    0x88
+#define PROTECT_BIT    BIT(5)
+#define SOFT_RESET_REG 0x00
+#define SOFT_RESET_BIT BIT(1)
+#define CHIP_COMMON_REG 0x10
+#define CHIP_COMMON_BIT BIT(0)
+
+struct mchp_reset_context {
+	struct regmap *cpu_ctrl;
+	struct regmap *switch_ctrl;
+	struct regmap *chip_ctrl;
+	struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
+};
+
+static int lan966x_switch_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
+				unsigned long id)
+{
+	struct mchp_reset_context *ctx =
+		container_of(rcdev, struct mchp_reset_context, rcdev);
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Make sure the core is PROTECTED from reset */
+	regmap_update_bits(ctx->cpu_ctrl, PROTECT_REG, PROTECT_BIT, PROTECT_BIT);
+
+	/* Start soft reset */
+	regmap_write(ctx->switch_ctrl, SOFT_RESET_REG, SOFT_RESET_BIT);
+
+	/* Wait for soft reset done */
+	ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(ctx->switch_ctrl, SOFT_RESET_REG, val,
+				       (val & SOFT_RESET_BIT) == 0, 1, 100);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Release the reset of internal PHY */
+	regmap_update_bits(ctx->chip_ctrl, CHIP_COMMON_REG, CHIP_COMMON_BIT,
+			   CHIP_COMMON_BIT);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct reset_control_ops lan966x_reset_ops = {
+	.reset = lan966x_switch_reset,
+};
+
+static int mchp_lan966x_map_syscon(struct platform_device *pdev, char *name,
+				  struct regmap **target)
+{
+	struct device_node *syscon_np;
+	struct regmap *regmap;
+	int err;
+
+	syscon_np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, name, 0);
+	if (!syscon_np)
+		return -ENODEV;
+	regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(syscon_np);
+	of_node_put(syscon_np);
+	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(regmap);
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No '%s' map: %d\n", name, err);
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	*target = regmap;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mchp_lan966x_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct mchp_reset_context *ctx;
+	int err;
+
+	ctx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	err = mchp_lan966x_map_syscon(pdev, "cpu-syscon", &ctx->cpu_ctrl);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = mchp_lan966x_map_syscon(pdev, "switch-syscon", &ctx->switch_ctrl);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = mchp_lan966x_map_syscon(pdev, "chip-syscon", &ctx->chip_ctrl);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	ctx->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+	ctx->rcdev.nr_resets = 1;
+	ctx->rcdev.ops = &lan966x_reset_ops;
+	ctx->rcdev.of_node = dn;
+
+	return devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &ctx->rcdev);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id mchp_lan966x_reset_of_match[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "microchip,lan966x-switch-reset",
+	},
+	{ }
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver mchp_lan966x_reset_driver = {
+	.probe = mchp_lan966x_reset_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "lan966x-switch-reset",
+		.of_match_table = mchp_lan966x_reset_of_match,
+	},
+};
+
+static int __init mchp_lan966x_reset_init(void)
+{
+	return platform_driver_register(&mchp_lan966x_reset_driver);
+}
+
+postcore_initcall(mchp_lan966x_reset_init);