diff mbox series

cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix unchecked MSR 0x773 access

Message ID 20211104051925.119941-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined, archived
Delegated to: Rafael Wysocki
Headers show
Series cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix unchecked MSR 0x773 access | expand

Commit Message

srinivas pandruvada Nov. 4, 2021, 5:19 a.m. UTC
It is possible that on some platforms HWP interrupts are disabled. In
that case accessing MSR 0x773 will result in warning.

So check X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY feature to access MSR 0x773. The other
places in code where this MSR is accessed, already checks this feature
except during disable path called during cpufreq offline and suspend
callbacks.

Fixes: 57577c996d73 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Process HWP Guaranteed change notification")
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

Steven Rostedt Nov. 4, 2021, 1:30 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed,  3 Nov 2021 22:19:25 -0700
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> It is possible that on some platforms HWP interrupts are disabled. In
> that case accessing MSR 0x773 will result in warning.
> 
> So check X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY feature to access MSR 0x773. The other
> places in code where this MSR is accessed, already checks this feature
> except during disable path called during cpufreq offline and suspend
> callbacks.
> 
> Fixes: 57577c996d73 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Process HWP Guaranteed change notification")
> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

I added this patch on top of the above commit and I verified that the issue
goes away. And just to confirm, I removed the patch, and the issue
reappeared.

Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve


> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 349ddbaef796..1e6898dc76b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1620,6 +1620,9 @@ static void intel_pstate_disable_hwp_interrupt(struct cpudata *cpudata)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY))
> +		return;
> +
>  	/* wrmsrl_on_cpu has to be outside spinlock as this can result in IPC */
>  	wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpudata->cpu, MSR_HWP_INTERRUPT, 0x00);
>
srinivas pandruvada Nov. 4, 2021, 2:15 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 09:30 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed,  3 Nov 2021 22:19:25 -0700
> Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > It is possible that on some platforms HWP interrupts are disabled.
> > In
> > that case accessing MSR 0x773 will result in warning.
> > 
> > So check X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY feature to access MSR 0x773. The
> > other
> > places in code where this MSR is accessed, already checks this
> > feature
> > except during disable path called during cpufreq offline and
> > suspend
> > callbacks.
> > 
> > Fixes: 57577c996d73 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Process HWP Guaranteed
> > change notification")
> > Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> I added this patch on top of the above commit and I verified that the
> issue
> goes away. And just to confirm, I removed the patch, and the issue
> reappeared.
> 
> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
Thanks for the test.
Sorry again for the mess up.

-Srinivas

> -- Steve
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <
> > srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > index 349ddbaef796..1e6898dc76b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > @@ -1620,6 +1620,9 @@ static void
> > intel_pstate_disable_hwp_interrupt(struct cpudata *cpudata)
> >  {
> >         unsigned long flags;
> >  
> > +       if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY))
> > +               return;
> > +
> >         /* wrmsrl_on_cpu has to be outside spinlock as this can
> > result in IPC */
> >         wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpudata->cpu, MSR_HWP_INTERRUPT, 0x00);
> >  
>
Rafael J. Wysocki Nov. 4, 2021, 6:51 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 3:17 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 09:30 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed,  3 Nov 2021 22:19:25 -0700
> > Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It is possible that on some platforms HWP interrupts are disabled.
> > > In
> > > that case accessing MSR 0x773 will result in warning.
> > >
> > > So check X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY feature to access MSR 0x773. The
> > > other
> > > places in code where this MSR is accessed, already checks this
> > > feature
> > > except during disable path called during cpufreq offline and
> > > suspend
> > > callbacks.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 57577c996d73 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Process HWP Guaranteed
> > > change notification")
> > > Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> >
> > I added this patch on top of the above commit and I verified that the
> > issue
> > goes away. And just to confirm, I removed the patch, and the issue
> > reappeared.
> >
> > Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> >
> Thanks for the test.
> Sorry again for the mess up.
>
> -Srinivas
>
> > -- Steve
> >
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <
> > > srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > index 349ddbaef796..1e6898dc76b6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > @@ -1620,6 +1620,9 @@ static void
> > > intel_pstate_disable_hwp_interrupt(struct cpudata *cpudata)
> > >  {
> > >         unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > > +       if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY))
> > > +               return;
> > > +
> > >         /* wrmsrl_on_cpu has to be outside spinlock as this can
> > > result in IPC */
> > >         wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpudata->cpu, MSR_HWP_INTERRUPT, 0x00);
> > >

Applied as 5.16-rc material, thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 349ddbaef796..1e6898dc76b6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -1620,6 +1620,9 @@  static void intel_pstate_disable_hwp_interrupt(struct cpudata *cpudata)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY))
+		return;
+
 	/* wrmsrl_on_cpu has to be outside spinlock as this can result in IPC */
 	wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpudata->cpu, MSR_HWP_INTERRUPT, 0x00);