diff mbox series

[v2,1/2] cpufreq: Fix a comment in cpufreq_policy_free

Message ID 20211201071500.28648-2-tangyizhou@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series cpufreq: Update function comment and document | expand

Commit Message

Tang Yizhou Dec. 1, 2021, 7:14 a.m. UTC
Comment both when CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY and CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY
notification are sent.

Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Viresh Kumar Dec. 1, 2021, 6:51 a.m. UTC | #1
On 01-12-21, 15:14, Tang Yizhou wrote:
> Comment both when CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY and CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY
> notification are sent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index e338d2f010fe..e76777881739 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1296,8 +1296,9 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  	if (policy->max_freq_req) {
>  		/*
> -		 * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
> -		 * successfully adding max_freq_req request.
> +		 * Need to send CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY notification if
> +		 * max_freq_req request is successfully added.
> +		 * See also: CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification.

I will rather write this as:

		/*
                 * Remove max_freq_req after sending CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY
                 * notification, since CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification was
                 * sent after adding max_freq_req earlier.
                 */

>  		 */
>  		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
>  					     CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy);
> @@ -1429,6 +1430,10 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
>  			goto out_destroy_policy;
>  		}
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
> +		 * successfully adding max_freq_req request.
> +		 */

This is obvious, we don't need a comment here.

>  		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
>  				CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.17.1
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index e338d2f010fe..e76777881739 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1296,8 +1296,9 @@  static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	if (policy->max_freq_req) {
 		/*
-		 * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
-		 * successfully adding max_freq_req request.
+		 * Need to send CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY notification if
+		 * max_freq_req request is successfully added.
+		 * See also: CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification.
 		 */
 		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
 					     CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy);
@@ -1429,6 +1430,10 @@  static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 			goto out_destroy_policy;
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
+		 * successfully adding max_freq_req request.
+		 */
 		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
 				CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy);
 	}