From patchwork Wed Dec 1 07:40:20 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tang Yizhou X-Patchwork-Id: 12649245 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72426C433EF for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 07:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347106AbhLAHQE (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 02:16:04 -0500 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:27326 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347108AbhLAHQE (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 02:16:04 -0500 Received: from dggpeml500023.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4J3qzQ74hbzbj8r; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:12:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.76) by dggpeml500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:12:42 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.100.227) by dggpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:12:41 +0800 From: Tang Yizhou To: , , CC: , , , Tang Yizhou Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Fix a comment in cpufreq_policy_free Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:40:20 +0800 Message-ID: <20211201074021.18097-2-tangyizhou@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20211201074021.18097-1-tangyizhou@huawei.com> References: <20211201074021.18097-1-tangyizhou@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.100.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.76) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Make the comment of blocking_notifier_call_chain() easier to understand. Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou Acked-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index e338d2f010fe..db0b4b4258d5 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1296,8 +1296,9 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (policy->max_freq_req) { /* - * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after - * successfully adding max_freq_req request. + * Remove max_freq_req after sending CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY + * notification, since CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification was + * sent after adding max_freq_req earlier. */ blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy);