Message ID | 20220826021845.2283648-1-chris.zjh@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | cpufreq: bmips-cpufreq: Use module_init and add module_exit | expand |
On 26-08-22, 10:18, Zhang Jianhua wrote: > - Use module_init instead of device_initcall. > - Add a function for module_exit to unregister driver. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c > index f7c23fa468f0..21c0417c95e1 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver bmips_cpufreq_driver = { > .name = BMIPS_CPUFREQ_PREFIX, > }; > > -static int __init bmips_cpufreq_probe(void) > +static int __init bmips_cpufreq_driver_init(void) > { > struct cpufreq_compat *cc; > struct device_node *np; > @@ -176,7 +176,13 @@ static int __init bmips_cpufreq_probe(void) > > return cpufreq_register_driver(&bmips_cpufreq_driver); > } > -device_initcall(bmips_cpufreq_probe); > +module_init(bmips_cpufreq_driver_init); > + > +static void __exit bmips_cpufreq_driver_exit(void) > +{ > + cpufreq_unregister_driver(&bmips_cpufreq_driver); > +} > +module_exit(bmips_cpufreq_driver_exit) Semicolon ? Did you even compile this ? :) > > MODULE_AUTHOR("Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>"); > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("CPUfreq driver for Broadcom BMIPS SoCs"); > -- > 2.31.0
在 2022/8/30 13:29, Viresh Kumar 写道: > On 26-08-22, 10:18, Zhang Jianhua wrote: >> - Use module_init instead of device_initcall. >> - Add a function for module_exit to unregister driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c >> index f7c23fa468f0..21c0417c95e1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c >> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver bmips_cpufreq_driver = { >> .name = BMIPS_CPUFREQ_PREFIX, >> }; >> >> -static int __init bmips_cpufreq_probe(void) >> +static int __init bmips_cpufreq_driver_init(void) >> { >> struct cpufreq_compat *cc; >> struct device_node *np; >> @@ -176,7 +176,13 @@ static int __init bmips_cpufreq_probe(void) >> >> return cpufreq_register_driver(&bmips_cpufreq_driver); >> } >> -device_initcall(bmips_cpufreq_probe); >> +module_init(bmips_cpufreq_driver_init); >> + >> +static void __exit bmips_cpufreq_driver_exit(void) >> +{ >> + cpufreq_unregister_driver(&bmips_cpufreq_driver); >> +} >> +module_exit(bmips_cpufreq_driver_exit) > Semicolon ? Did you even compile this ? :) Semicolon is not necessary for module_exit, and it can be compiled. I will send v2 patch to keep the format consistent, thanks. >> >> MODULE_AUTHOR("Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>"); >> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("CPUfreq driver for Broadcom BMIPS SoCs"); >> -- >> 2.31.0
On 30-08-22, 16:01, zhangjianhua (E) wrote: > > 在 2022/8/30 13:29, Viresh Kumar 写道: > > On 26-08-22, 10:18, Zhang Jianhua wrote: > > > - Use module_init instead of device_initcall. > > > - Add a function for module_exit to unregister driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c > > > index f7c23fa468f0..21c0417c95e1 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c > > > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver bmips_cpufreq_driver = { > > > .name = BMIPS_CPUFREQ_PREFIX, > > > }; > > > -static int __init bmips_cpufreq_probe(void) > > > +static int __init bmips_cpufreq_driver_init(void) > > > { > > > struct cpufreq_compat *cc; > > > struct device_node *np; > > > @@ -176,7 +176,13 @@ static int __init bmips_cpufreq_probe(void) > > > return cpufreq_register_driver(&bmips_cpufreq_driver); > > > } > > > -device_initcall(bmips_cpufreq_probe); > > > +module_init(bmips_cpufreq_driver_init); > > > + > > > +static void __exit bmips_cpufreq_driver_exit(void) > > > +{ > > > + cpufreq_unregister_driver(&bmips_cpufreq_driver); > > > +} > > > +module_exit(bmips_cpufreq_driver_exit) > > Semicolon ? Did you even compile this ? :) > > Semicolon is not necessary for module_exit, and it can be compiled. I will send v2 patch to keep the format consistent, thanks. Ahh, because module exit is defined as: #define module_exit(x) __exitcall(x); Yeah, please send V2 with a semicolon in place.
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c index f7c23fa468f0..21c0417c95e1 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver bmips_cpufreq_driver = { .name = BMIPS_CPUFREQ_PREFIX, }; -static int __init bmips_cpufreq_probe(void) +static int __init bmips_cpufreq_driver_init(void) { struct cpufreq_compat *cc; struct device_node *np; @@ -176,7 +176,13 @@ static int __init bmips_cpufreq_probe(void) return cpufreq_register_driver(&bmips_cpufreq_driver); } -device_initcall(bmips_cpufreq_probe); +module_init(bmips_cpufreq_driver_init); + +static void __exit bmips_cpufreq_driver_exit(void) +{ + cpufreq_unregister_driver(&bmips_cpufreq_driver); +} +module_exit(bmips_cpufreq_driver_exit) MODULE_AUTHOR("Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("CPUfreq driver for Broadcom BMIPS SoCs");
- Use module_init instead of device_initcall. - Add a function for module_exit to unregister driver. Signed-off-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com> --- drivers/cpufreq/bmips-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)