diff mbox series

thermal: imx_sc_thermal: Drop empty platform remove function

Message ID 20221212220217.3777176-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Delegated to: Daniel Lezcano
Headers show
Series thermal: imx_sc_thermal: Drop empty platform remove function | expand

Commit Message

Uwe Kleine-König Dec. 12, 2022, 10:02 p.m. UTC
A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback
at all. So drop the useless function.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)


base-commit: 830b3c68c1fb1e9176028d02ef86f3cf76aa2476

Comments

Daniel Lezcano Dec. 13, 2022, 7:46 a.m. UTC | #1
On 12/12/2022 23:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback
> at all. So drop the useless function.

AFAIU, without the remove callback the module can not be unloaded, no?

> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>   drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c | 6 ------
>   1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
> index 5d92b70a5d53..4df925e3a80b 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
> @@ -127,11 +127,6 @@ static int imx_sc_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static int imx_sc_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>   static int imx_sc_sensors[] = { IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM, IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0, -1 };
>   
>   static const struct of_device_id imx_sc_thermal_table[] = {
> @@ -142,7 +137,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_sc_thermal_table);
>   
>   static struct platform_driver imx_sc_thermal_driver = {
>   		.probe = imx_sc_thermal_probe,
> -		.remove	= imx_sc_thermal_remove,
>   		.driver = {
>   			.name = "imx-sc-thermal",
>   			.of_match_table = imx_sc_thermal_table,
> 
> base-commit: 830b3c68c1fb1e9176028d02ef86f3cf76aa2476
Marco Felsch Dec. 13, 2022, 7:54 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Daniel,

On 22-12-13, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 23:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback
> > at all. So drop the useless function.
> 
> AFAIU, without the remove callback the module can not be unloaded, no?

This should be unrelated according:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L1419

Regards,
  Marco


> 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >   drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c | 6 ------
> >   1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
> > index 5d92b70a5d53..4df925e3a80b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
> > @@ -127,11 +127,6 @@ static int imx_sc_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> > -static int imx_sc_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > -{
> > -	return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> >   static int imx_sc_sensors[] = { IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM, IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0, -1 };
> >   static const struct of_device_id imx_sc_thermal_table[] = {
> > @@ -142,7 +137,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_sc_thermal_table);
> >   static struct platform_driver imx_sc_thermal_driver = {
> >   		.probe = imx_sc_thermal_probe,
> > -		.remove	= imx_sc_thermal_remove,
> >   		.driver = {
> >   			.name = "imx-sc-thermal",
> >   			.of_match_table = imx_sc_thermal_table,
> > 
> > base-commit: 830b3c68c1fb1e9176028d02ef86f3cf76aa2476
> 
> -- 
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> 
> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
> 
> 
>
Uwe Kleine-König Dec. 13, 2022, 8:13 a.m. UTC | #3
Hello Daniel,

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 08:46:45AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 23:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback
> > at all. So drop the useless function.
> 
> AFAIU, without the remove callback the module can not be unloaded, no?

This is a wrong expectation. As Marko already pointed out the relevant
code path in platform_remove(), having no remove callback is equivalent
to a remove callback that returns zero unconditionally.

Note that driver unbinding and module unloading are two separate
concepts.

If you want to prevent driver unbinding, you can set struct
device_driver::suppress_bind_attrs.

For modules your assumption is true: If there is an init but no exit
function, a module cannot be unloaded[1]. Also while a reference to the
module is held, the module won't go away. (E.g. a bound device holds
such a reference.)

Best regards
Uwe

[1] apart from MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD
Daniel Lezcano Dec. 13, 2022, 8:52 a.m. UTC | #4
On 13/12/2022 08:54, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 22-12-13, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 12/12/2022 23:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback
>>> at all. So drop the useless function.
>>
>> AFAIU, without the remove callback the module can not be unloaded, no?
> 
> This should be unrelated according:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L1419

Indeed :)

>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c | 6 ------
>>>    1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
>>> index 5d92b70a5d53..4df925e3a80b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
>>> @@ -127,11 +127,6 @@ static int imx_sc_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>> -static int imx_sc_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> -{
>>> -	return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>    static int imx_sc_sensors[] = { IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM, IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0, -1 };
>>>    static const struct of_device_id imx_sc_thermal_table[] = {
>>> @@ -142,7 +137,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_sc_thermal_table);
>>>    static struct platform_driver imx_sc_thermal_driver = {
>>>    		.probe = imx_sc_thermal_probe,
>>> -		.remove	= imx_sc_thermal_remove,
>>>    		.driver = {
>>>    			.name = "imx-sc-thermal",
>>>    			.of_match_table = imx_sc_thermal_table,
>>>
>>> base-commit: 830b3c68c1fb1e9176028d02ef86f3cf76aa2476
>>
>> -- 
>> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>>
>> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>>
>>
>>
Daniel Lezcano Dec. 13, 2022, 8:56 a.m. UTC | #5
On 13/12/2022 09:13, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 08:46:45AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 12/12/2022 23:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback
>>> at all. So drop the useless function.
>>
>> AFAIU, without the remove callback the module can not be unloaded, no?
> 
> This is a wrong expectation. As Marko already pointed out the relevant
> code path in platform_remove(), having no remove callback is equivalent
> to a remove callback that returns zero unconditionally.

In a previous discussion (don't remember which one) someone asserted a 
null remove callback will prevent the module removal like not having the 
exit module callback but I did not double check.

Thanks for the clarification.
Daniel Lezcano Dec. 13, 2022, 9:07 a.m. UTC | #6
On 12/12/2022 23:02, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback
> at all. So drop the useless function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---

Applied thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
index 5d92b70a5d53..4df925e3a80b 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
@@ -127,11 +127,6 @@  static int imx_sc_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int imx_sc_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int imx_sc_sensors[] = { IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM, IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0, -1 };
 
 static const struct of_device_id imx_sc_thermal_table[] = {
@@ -142,7 +137,6 @@  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_sc_thermal_table);
 
 static struct platform_driver imx_sc_thermal_driver = {
 		.probe = imx_sc_thermal_probe,
-		.remove	= imx_sc_thermal_remove,
 		.driver = {
 			.name = "imx-sc-thermal",
 			.of_match_table = imx_sc_thermal_table,