From patchwork Tue Mar 12 10:37:23 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sibi Sankar X-Patchwork-Id: 13589823 Received: from mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.168.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294F041C89; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.168.131 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710239879; cv=none; b=IUPF23BKpya/GxsHzo2lmzKgIa9s8IjbhA+fQ1VxmyDz3U92oG6ABzprw0iP+DQ6NurSqpDVhazEflpgXnyJgLD1qH0MSP82w8KVEKwPJU2i0X/vhUjZUgBnpgVM/eBXH1jGEQ8+JgHJL3DNplZjQT//b7bu++ZcFoQSm8+Dpm8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710239879; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j0KHEpP4+A64VEo8ddI2ua0gUpz6VjXmabhAZemrxXI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HGUVDEStZQATGlE5OpCQBOcaJTuUqX1pfDXPx+nx59nF9iDCgtg59R/12L/C5DmR9AUWzIJmyxk49Xx0/i7898o5Ec7Et9dIe8MyyRFyPzYuXy7Twyc3lwW8u4sNGVmE9GjSGuc80w0/t1la3irI+YW/nejedH/29R9GNPhT+C4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b=AixALP2U; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.168.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="AixALP2U" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279863.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.24/8.17.1.24) with ESMTP id 42C5mQW9013154; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:37:44 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=qcppdkim1; bh=0/twHL4 Fim0hDqCqcJaDFQzlmAB51tPWASIpJFotokM=; b=AixALP2U03azFYiB4gN/w3M m015fPzkt2ckDDMRW07zHG5OlAEWCq4wopMO5WaxzxkwsdJi74BeKxtLA5UsA2// Sn9ViKo3hNqtL1uRsQgymhvdtEnktZF6VXZ7g7zy43CgCnkLnakTQuwPuoaUyeCe FoIiW8yAtbWU4dBjau2rPyBWFxSs5NrOQsitKs6hD8HWPG3sU/qKpGTXktKR6kcL 0Gstyv9uY8wg+9ctMCm7BmuTGcTt0CBKuBSu9FhDCmigzPuJNnGKVfUK15pSeFpR KN1i9G+K8lpx/bQOWUks3Twh0U7GOxJAwcf4pLH+jEigpeSomPh0KUvI1tSdD7Q= = Received: from nalasppmta02.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3wth7rrhtb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:37:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.209.196]) by NALASPPMTA02.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 42CAbhFY027348 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:37:43 GMT Received: from hu-sibis-blr.qualcomm.com (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.40; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 03:37:38 -0700 From: Sibi Sankar To: , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , Sibi Sankar Subject: [PATCH V3] cpufreq: Fix per-policy boost behavior on SoCs using cpufreq_boost_set_sw Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 16:07:23 +0530 Message-ID: <20240312103723.3469762-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 1nBfNmxRHoY_LM4sbNxFBJx3mrwAk26c X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 1nBfNmxRHoY_LM4sbNxFBJx3mrwAk26c X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-03-12_08,2024-03-11_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2402120000 definitions=main-2403120081 In the existing code, per-policy flags doesn't have any impact i.e. if cpufreq_driver boost is enabled and one or more of the per-policy boost is disabled, the cpufreq driver will behave as if boost is enabled. Fix this by incorporating per-policy boost flag in the policy->max calculus used in cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo and setting the default per-policy boost to mirror the cpufreq_driver boost flag. Fixes: 218a06a79d9a ("cpufreq: Support per-policy performance boost") Reported-by: Dietmar Eggemann Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar Tested-by:Yipeng Zou Reviewed-by: Yipeng Zou --- v3: * Pickup Rbs. * Simplify per-policy boost setting. [Viresh] v2: * Enable per-policy boost flag in the core instead. [Viresh] * Add more details regarding the bug. [Viresh] * Drop cover-letter and patch 2. Logs reported-by Dietmar Eggemann: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/265e5f2c-9b45-420f-89b1-44369aeb8418@arm.com/ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index f6f8d7f450e7..66e10a19d76a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -653,14 +653,16 @@ static ssize_t store_local_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (policy->boost_enabled == enable) return count; + policy->boost_enabled = enable; + cpus_read_lock(); ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, enable); cpus_read_unlock(); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled; return ret; - - policy->boost_enabled = enable; + } return count; } @@ -1428,6 +1430,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) goto out_free_policy; } + /* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */ + policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled() && policy_has_boost_freq(policy); + /* * The initialization has succeeded and the policy is online. * If there is a problem with its frequency table, take it @@ -2769,11 +2774,12 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state) cpus_read_lock(); for_each_active_policy(policy) { + policy->boost_enabled = state; ret = cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, state); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled; goto err_reset_state; - - policy->boost_enabled = state; + } } cpus_read_unlock(); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c index c4d4643b6ca6..c17dc51a5a02 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) { freq = pos->frequency; - if (!cpufreq_boost_enabled() + if ((!cpufreq_boost_enabled() || !policy->boost_enabled) && (pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ)) continue;