| Message ID | 20240418092305.2337429-2-quic_varada@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add interconnect driver for IPQ9574 SoC | expand |
On 4/18/24 11:23, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > Presently, icc-clk driver autogenerates the master and slave ids. > However, devices with multiple nodes on the interconnect could > have other constraints and may not match with the auto generated > node ids. Hence, allow the driver to provide the preferred master > and slave ids. > > Also, update clk-cbf-8996 accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com> > --- > v9: squash cbf-msm8996 change into this > v8: Per review feedback, set master/slave ids explicitly. Dont autogenerate > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/f1b0d280-6986-4055-a611-2caceb15867d@linaro.org/ > --- > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c | 7 ++++++- > drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c | 6 +++--- > include/linux/interconnect-clk.h | 2 ++ How is this going to be merged? :/ icc-next? clk-next? Konrad
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 01:00:48AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > On 4/18/24 11:23, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > > Presently, icc-clk driver autogenerates the master and slave ids. > > However, devices with multiple nodes on the interconnect could > > have other constraints and may not match with the auto generated > > node ids. Hence, allow the driver to provide the preferred master > > and slave ids. > > > > Also, update clk-cbf-8996 accordingly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com> > > --- > > v9: squash cbf-msm8996 change into this > > v8: Per review feedback, set master/slave ids explicitly. Dont autogenerate > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/f1b0d280-6986-4055-a611-2caceb15867d@linaro.org/ > > --- > > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c | 7 ++++++- > > drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c | 6 +++--- > > include/linux/interconnect-clk.h | 2 ++ > > How is this going to be merged? :/ > > icc-next? clk-next? Bjorn, Can you help answer this. Thanks Varada
On 25.04.24 13:28, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 01:00:48AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> >> On 4/18/24 11:23, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: >>> Presently, icc-clk driver autogenerates the master and slave ids. >>> However, devices with multiple nodes on the interconnect could >>> have other constraints and may not match with the auto generated >>> node ids. Hence, allow the driver to provide the preferred master >>> and slave ids. >>> >>> Also, update clk-cbf-8996 accordingly. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com> >>> --- >>> v9: squash cbf-msm8996 change into this >>> v8: Per review feedback, set master/slave ids explicitly. Dont autogenerate >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/f1b0d280-6986-4055-a611-2caceb15867d@linaro.org/ >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c | 7 ++++++- >>> drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c | 6 +++--- >>> include/linux/interconnect-clk.h | 2 ++ >> >> How is this going to be merged? :/ >> >> icc-next? clk-next? > Merging all patches via Bjorn's clk-qcom tree seems to be the best option, if he agrees of course. Thanks, Georgi > Bjorn, > > Can you help answer this. > > Thanks > Varada
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c index fe24b4abeab4..a077d4403967 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c @@ -237,7 +237,12 @@ static int qcom_msm8996_cbf_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev, struct cl struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct clk *clk = devm_clk_hw_get_clk(dev, cbf_hw, "cbf"); const struct icc_clk_data data[] = { - { .clk = clk, .name = "cbf", }, + { + .clk = clk, + .name = "cbf", + .master_id = MASTER_CBF_M4M, + .slave_id = SLAVE_CBF_M4M, + }, }; struct icc_provider *provider; diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c b/drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c index d787f2ea36d9..2be193fd7d8f 100644 --- a/drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c +++ b/drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ struct icc_provider *icc_clk_register(struct device *dev, for (i = 0, j = 0; i < num_clocks; i++) { qp->clocks[i].clk = data[i].clk; - node = icc_node_create(first_id + j); + node = icc_node_create(first_id + data[i].master_id); if (IS_ERR(node)) { ret = PTR_ERR(node); goto err; @@ -118,10 +118,10 @@ struct icc_provider *icc_clk_register(struct device *dev, node->data = &qp->clocks[i]; icc_node_add(node, provider); /* link to the next node, slave */ - icc_link_create(node, first_id + j + 1); + icc_link_create(node, first_id + data[i].slave_id); onecell->nodes[j++] = node; - node = icc_node_create(first_id + j); + node = icc_node_create(first_id + data[i].slave_id); if (IS_ERR(node)) { ret = PTR_ERR(node); goto err; diff --git a/include/linux/interconnect-clk.h b/include/linux/interconnect-clk.h index 0cd80112bea5..170898faaacb 100644 --- a/include/linux/interconnect-clk.h +++ b/include/linux/interconnect-clk.h @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ struct device; struct icc_clk_data { struct clk *clk; const char *name; + unsigned int master_id; + unsigned int slave_id; }; struct icc_provider *icc_clk_register(struct device *dev,
Presently, icc-clk driver autogenerates the master and slave ids. However, devices with multiple nodes on the interconnect could have other constraints and may not match with the auto generated node ids. Hence, allow the driver to provide the preferred master and slave ids. Also, update clk-cbf-8996 accordingly. Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com> --- v9: squash cbf-msm8996 change into this v8: Per review feedback, set master/slave ids explicitly. Dont autogenerate https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/f1b0d280-6986-4055-a611-2caceb15867d@linaro.org/ --- drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c | 7 ++++++- drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c | 6 +++--- include/linux/interconnect-clk.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)