| Message ID | 20240802151647.294307-3-detlev.casanova@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add power-controller support for rk3576 | expand |
On 02/08/2024 17:14, Detlev Casanova wrote: > From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> > > Define power domain IDs as described in the TRM. Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are explained here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters > > Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> > [reword] > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com> > --- > include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h This is part of bindings. > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h Missing vendor prefix. This should be named after compatible. > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..cb33a32c1aed9 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */ Weird license. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Sunday, 4 August 2024 05:56:39 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 02/08/2024 17:14, Detlev Casanova wrote: > > From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> > > > > Define power domain IDs as described in the TRM. > > Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for > example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory > your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are > explained here: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patche > s.html#i-for-patch-submitters > > Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> > > [reword] > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com> > > --- > > > > include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > > This is part of bindings. > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > > b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > Missing vendor prefix. This should be named after compatible. Looks like all other rockchip power bindings use the include/dt-bindings/ power/rkXXXX.h format. Should I keep that way ? > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000000..cb33a32c1aed9 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */ > > Weird license. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
Hi Detlev, Am Dienstag, 6. August 2024, 18:34:41 CEST schrieb Detlev Casanova: > On Sunday, 4 August 2024 05:56:39 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 02/08/2024 17:14, Detlev Casanova wrote: > > > From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> > > > > > > Define power domain IDs as described in the TRM. > > > > Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for > > example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory > > your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are > > explained here: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patche > > s.html#i-for-patch-submitters > > > Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> > > > [reword] > > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com> > > > --- > > > > > > include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > > > > This is part of bindings. > > > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > > > b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > > Missing vendor prefix. This should be named after compatible. > > Looks like all other rockchip power bindings use the include/dt-bindings/ > power/rkXXXX.h format. Should I keep that way ? there is also rockchip,rv1126-power.h , so please follow Krzysztof's suggestion. Older header namings need to stay the same of course but that shouldn't keep us from updating naming schemes to better work in new additions.
Hello Heiko, On 2024-08-08 09:54, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Dienstag, 6. August 2024, 18:34:41 CEST schrieb Detlev Casanova: >> On Sunday, 4 August 2024 05:56:39 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> > On 02/08/2024 17:14, Detlev Casanova wrote: >> > > From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> >> > > >> > > Define power domain IDs as described in the TRM. >> > >> > Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for >> > example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory >> > your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are >> > explained here: >> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patche >> > s.html#i-for-patch-submitters >> > > Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> >> > > [reword] >> > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com> >> > > --- >> > > >> > > include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) >> > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h >> > >> > This is part of bindings. >> > >> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h >> > > b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h >> > Missing vendor prefix. This should be named after compatible. >> >> Looks like all other rockchip power bindings use the >> include/dt-bindings/ >> power/rkXXXX.h format. Should I keep that way ? > > there is also rockchip,rv1126-power.h , so please follow Krzysztof's > suggestion. Older header namings need to stay the same of course > but that shouldn't keep us from updating naming schemes to better > work in new additions. Actually, why don't we rename the old headers to follow the new naming rules? Is there something preventing us from doing that, which I'm missing?
Am Donnerstag, 8. August 2024, 18:43:42 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic: > Hello Heiko, > > On 2024-08-08 09:54, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 6. August 2024, 18:34:41 CEST schrieb Detlev Casanova: > >> On Sunday, 4 August 2024 05:56:39 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> > On 02/08/2024 17:14, Detlev Casanova wrote: > >> > > From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> > >> > > > >> > > Define power domain IDs as described in the TRM. > >> > > >> > Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for > >> > example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory > >> > your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are > >> > explained here: > >> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patche > >> > s.html#i-for-patch-submitters > >> > > Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> > >> > > [reword] > >> > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com> > >> > > --- > >> > > > >> > > include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > >> > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > >> > > >> > This is part of bindings. > >> > > >> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > >> > > b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > >> > Missing vendor prefix. This should be named after compatible. > >> > >> Looks like all other rockchip power bindings use the > >> include/dt-bindings/ > >> power/rkXXXX.h format. Should I keep that way ? > > > > there is also rockchip,rv1126-power.h , so please follow Krzysztof's > > suggestion. Older header namings need to stay the same of course > > but that shouldn't keep us from updating naming schemes to better > > work in new additions. > > Actually, why don't we rename the old headers to follow the new naming > rules? > Is there something preventing us from doing that, which I'm missing? yes, the headers are _part_ of the actual devicetree-binding. So you have out of tree users in the BSDs or whereever else.
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..cb33a32c1aed9 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */ +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_RK3576_POWER_H__ +#define __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_RK3576_POWER_H__ + +/* VD_NPU */ +#define RK3576_PD_NPU 0 +#define RK3576_PD_NPUTOP 1 +#define RK3576_PD_NPU0 2 +#define RK3576_PD_NPU1 3 + +/* VD_GPU */ +#define RK3576_PD_GPU 4 + +/* VD_LOGIC */ +#define RK3576_PD_NVM 5 +#define RK3576_PD_SDGMAC 6 +#define RK3576_PD_USB 7 +#define RK3576_PD_PHP 8 +#define RK3576_PD_SUBPHP 9 +#define RK3576_PD_AUDIO 10 +#define RK3576_PD_VEPU0 11 +#define RK3576_PD_VEPU1 12 +#define RK3576_PD_VPU 13 +#define RK3576_PD_VDEC 14 +#define RK3576_PD_VI 15 +#define RK3576_PD_VO0 16 +#define RK3576_PD_VO1 17 +#define RK3576_PD_VOP 18 + +#endif