| Message ID | 20241024105938.1095358-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | thermal/lib: Fix memory leak on error in thermal_genl_auto() | expand |
On 24/10/2024 12:59, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > The function thermal_genl_auto() does not free the allocated message > in the error path. Fix that by putting a out label and jump to it > which will free the message instead of directly returning an error. Please note this patch applies on top of the thresholds series. If nobody complains about the change, I'll take care of applying this patch after the thermal thresholds series appears in the linux-pm branch Thanks -- D. > Reported-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > --- > tools/lib/thermal/commands.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c > index bcf0f14d035a..b0d4c8aca21c 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c > +++ b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c > @@ -375,27 +375,30 @@ static thermal_error_t thermal_genl_auto(struct thermal_handler *th, cmd_cb_t cm > struct cmd_param *param, > int cmd, int flags, void *arg) > { > + thermal_error_t ret = THERMAL_ERROR; > struct nl_msg *msg; > void *hdr; > > msg = nlmsg_alloc(); > if (!msg) > - return THERMAL_ERROR; > + goto out; > > hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, NL_AUTO_PORT, NL_AUTO_SEQ, thermal_cmd_ops.o_id, > 0, flags, cmd, THERMAL_GENL_VERSION); > if (!hdr) > - return THERMAL_ERROR; > + goto out; > > if (cmd_cb && cmd_cb(msg, param)) > - return THERMAL_ERROR; > + goto out; > > if (nl_send_msg(th->sk_cmd, th->cb_cmd, msg, genl_handle_msg, arg)) > - return THERMAL_ERROR; > + goto out; > > + ret = THERMAL_SUCCESS; > +out: > nlmsg_free(msg); > > - return THERMAL_SUCCESS; > + return ret; > } > > thermal_error_t thermal_cmd_get_tz(struct thermal_handler *th, struct thermal_zone **tz)
Hi Daniel, On 10/24/24 11:59, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > The function thermal_genl_auto() does not free the allocated message > in the error path. Fix that by putting a out label and jump to it > which will free the message instead of directly returning an error. > > Reported-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > --- > tools/lib/thermal/commands.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c > index bcf0f14d035a..b0d4c8aca21c 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c > +++ b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c > @@ -375,27 +375,30 @@ static thermal_error_t thermal_genl_auto(struct thermal_handler *th, cmd_cb_t cm > struct cmd_param *param, > int cmd, int flags, void *arg) > { > + thermal_error_t ret = THERMAL_ERROR; > struct nl_msg *msg; > void *hdr; > > msg = nlmsg_alloc(); > if (!msg) > - return THERMAL_ERROR; > + goto out; > > hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, NL_AUTO_PORT, NL_AUTO_SEQ, thermal_cmd_ops.o_id, > 0, flags, cmd, THERMAL_GENL_VERSION); > if (!hdr) > - return THERMAL_ERROR; > + goto out; > > if (cmd_cb && cmd_cb(msg, param)) > - return THERMAL_ERROR; > + goto out; > > if (nl_send_msg(th->sk_cmd, th->cb_cmd, msg, genl_handle_msg, arg)) > - return THERMAL_ERROR; > + goto out; > > + ret = THERMAL_SUCCESS; > +out: > nlmsg_free(msg); > > - return THERMAL_SUCCESS; > + return ret; > } > > thermal_error_t thermal_cmd_get_tz(struct thermal_handler *th, struct thermal_zone **tz) LGTM, Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Regards, Lukasz
> The function thermal_genl_auto() does not free the allocated message > in the error path. Fix that by putting a out label and jump to it > which will free the message instead of directly returning an error. Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.12-rc4#n145 … > +++ b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c > @@ -375,27 +375,30 @@ static thermal_error_t thermal_genl_auto(struct thermal_handler *th, cmd_cb_t cm > struct cmd_param *param, > int cmd, int flags, void *arg) > { > + thermal_error_t ret = THERMAL_ERROR; > struct nl_msg *msg; > void *hdr; > > msg = nlmsg_alloc(); > if (!msg) > - return THERMAL_ERROR; > + goto out; … Is it really reasonable to pass a null pointer (from a failed function call) to a subsequent nlmsg_free() call? Can it be more appropriate to return directly in such an error case? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v6.12-rc4#n532 Regards, Markus
On 24/10/2024 14:02, Markus Elfring wrote: >> The function thermal_genl_auto() does not free the allocated message >> in the error path. Fix that by putting a out label and jump to it >> which will free the message instead of directly returning an error. > > Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.12-rc4#n145 > > > … >> +++ b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c >> @@ -375,27 +375,30 @@ static thermal_error_t thermal_genl_auto(struct thermal_handler *th, cmd_cb_t cm >> struct cmd_param *param, >> int cmd, int flags, void *arg) >> { >> + thermal_error_t ret = THERMAL_ERROR; >> struct nl_msg *msg; >> void *hdr; >> >> msg = nlmsg_alloc(); >> if (!msg) >> - return THERMAL_ERROR; >> + goto out; > … > > Is it really reasonable to pass a null pointer (from a failed function call) > to a subsequent nlmsg_free() call? You are right, I should return here :S > Can it be more appropriate to return directly in such an error case? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v6.12-rc4#n532 > > Regards, > Markus
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 2:57 PM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 24/10/2024 14:02, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> The function thermal_genl_auto() does not free the allocated message > >> in the error path. Fix that by putting a out label and jump to it > >> which will free the message instead of directly returning an error. > > > > Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly? > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.12-rc4#n145 > > > > > > … > >> +++ b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c > >> @@ -375,27 +375,30 @@ static thermal_error_t thermal_genl_auto(struct thermal_handler *th, cmd_cb_t cm > >> struct cmd_param *param, > >> int cmd, int flags, void *arg) > >> { > >> + thermal_error_t ret = THERMAL_ERROR; > >> struct nl_msg *msg; > >> void *hdr; > >> > >> msg = nlmsg_alloc(); > >> if (!msg) > >> - return THERMAL_ERROR; > >> + goto out; > > … > > > > Is it really reasonable to pass a null pointer (from a failed function call) > > to a subsequent nlmsg_free() call? > > You are right, I should return here :S Do you want to respin it? Alternatively, I can fix it up when applying the patch.
On 10/24/24 14:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 2:57 PM Daniel Lezcano > <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 24/10/2024 14:02, Markus Elfring wrote: >>>> The function thermal_genl_auto() does not free the allocated message >>>> in the error path. Fix that by putting a out label and jump to it >>>> which will free the message instead of directly returning an error. >>> >>> Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly? >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.12-rc4#n145 >>> >>> >>> … >>>> +++ b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c >>>> @@ -375,27 +375,30 @@ static thermal_error_t thermal_genl_auto(struct thermal_handler *th, cmd_cb_t cm >>>> struct cmd_param *param, >>>> int cmd, int flags, void *arg) >>>> { >>>> + thermal_error_t ret = THERMAL_ERROR; >>>> struct nl_msg *msg; >>>> void *hdr; >>>> >>>> msg = nlmsg_alloc(); >>>> if (!msg) >>>> - return THERMAL_ERROR; >>>> + goto out; >>> … >>> >>> Is it really reasonable to pass a null pointer (from a failed function call) >>> to a subsequent nlmsg_free() call? >> >> You are right, I should return here :S > > Do you want to respin it? > > Alternatively, I can fix it up when applying the patch. The nlmskg_free() function should handle that similar to kfree(). Under the hood there is a check in skb_unref(): if (unlikely(!skb)) AFAIK the kfree() is used similar way and NULL is part of generic case sometimes, not handles with extra code. Up to you. You can keep my review tag in both cases.
On 24/10/2024 15:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 2:57 PM Daniel Lezcano > <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 24/10/2024 14:02, Markus Elfring wrote: >>>> The function thermal_genl_auto() does not free the allocated message >>>> in the error path. Fix that by putting a out label and jump to it >>>> which will free the message instead of directly returning an error. >>> >>> Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly? >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.12-rc4#n145 >>> >>> >>> … >>>> +++ b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c >>>> @@ -375,27 +375,30 @@ static thermal_error_t thermal_genl_auto(struct thermal_handler *th, cmd_cb_t cm >>>> struct cmd_param *param, >>>> int cmd, int flags, void *arg) >>>> { >>>> + thermal_error_t ret = THERMAL_ERROR; >>>> struct nl_msg *msg; >>>> void *hdr; >>>> >>>> msg = nlmsg_alloc(); >>>> if (!msg) >>>> - return THERMAL_ERROR; >>>> + goto out; >>> … >>> >>> Is it really reasonable to pass a null pointer (from a failed function call) >>> to a subsequent nlmsg_free() call? >> >> You are right, I should return here :S > > Do you want to respin it? > > Alternatively, I can fix it up when applying the patch. If you don't mind I would prefer to apply the lib patches For correctness, I'll send a V2 with the return fixed
> For correctness, I'll send a V2 with the return fixed
Would you become similarly interested to increase the application of
scope-based resource management also for the affected software component?
Regards,
Markus
On 24/10/2024 17:19, Markus Elfring wrote: >> For correctness, I'll send a V2 with the return fixed > > Would you become similarly interested to increase the application of > scope-based resource management also for the affected software component? Yes, I know it exist but I did not take the time to read the documentation, neither had the reflex to take care of that. Something I have to do :) It seems like this function is a good candidate :)
diff --git a/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c index bcf0f14d035a..b0d4c8aca21c 100644 --- a/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c +++ b/tools/lib/thermal/commands.c @@ -375,27 +375,30 @@ static thermal_error_t thermal_genl_auto(struct thermal_handler *th, cmd_cb_t cm struct cmd_param *param, int cmd, int flags, void *arg) { + thermal_error_t ret = THERMAL_ERROR; struct nl_msg *msg; void *hdr; msg = nlmsg_alloc(); if (!msg) - return THERMAL_ERROR; + goto out; hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, NL_AUTO_PORT, NL_AUTO_SEQ, thermal_cmd_ops.o_id, 0, flags, cmd, THERMAL_GENL_VERSION); if (!hdr) - return THERMAL_ERROR; + goto out; if (cmd_cb && cmd_cb(msg, param)) - return THERMAL_ERROR; + goto out; if (nl_send_msg(th->sk_cmd, th->cb_cmd, msg, genl_handle_msg, arg)) - return THERMAL_ERROR; + goto out; + ret = THERMAL_SUCCESS; +out: nlmsg_free(msg); - return THERMAL_SUCCESS; + return ret; } thermal_error_t thermal_cmd_get_tz(struct thermal_handler *th, struct thermal_zone **tz)
The function thermal_genl_auto() does not free the allocated message in the error path. Fix that by putting a out label and jump to it which will free the message instead of directly returning an error. Reported-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> --- tools/lib/thermal/commands.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)