| Message ID | 2c73ab54717ef358b118ea0cfb727b1427e7730a.1602648719.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | viresh kumar |
| Headers | show |
| Series | opp: Don't always remove static OPPs in _of_add_opp_table_v1() | expand |
Hi Viresh Thanks for the quick fix. > From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 12:26 PM > > The patch missed returning 0 early in case of success and hence the static OPPs > got removed by mistake. Fix it. > > Fixes: 90d46d71cce2 ("opp: Handle multiple calls for same OPP table in > _of_add_opp_table_v1()") > Reported-by: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Regards Aisheng > --- > drivers/opp/of.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c index > 874b58756220..9faeb83e4b32 100644 > --- a/drivers/opp/of.c > +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c > @@ -944,6 +944,8 @@ static int _of_add_opp_table_v1(struct device *dev, > struct opp_table *opp_table) > nr -= 2; > } > > + return 0; > + > remove_static_opp: > _opp_remove_all_static(opp_table); > > -- > 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
On 15-10-20, 02:35, Aisheng Dong wrote: > Hi Viresh > > Thanks for the quick fix. > > > From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 12:26 PM > > > > The patch missed returning 0 early in case of success and hence the static OPPs > > got removed by mistake. Fix it. > > > > Fixes: 90d46d71cce2 ("opp: Handle multiple calls for same OPP table in > > _of_add_opp_table_v1()") > > Reported-by: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > Tested-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Thanks. Rafael: Please apply this one directly for 5.10-rc. Thanks.
On 15-10-20, 10:01, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15-10-20, 02:35, Aisheng Dong wrote: > > Hi Viresh > > > > Thanks for the quick fix. > > > > > From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 12:26 PM > > > > > > The patch missed returning 0 early in case of success and hence the static OPPs > > > got removed by mistake. Fix it. > > > > > > Fixes: 90d46d71cce2 ("opp: Handle multiple calls for same OPP table in > > > _of_add_opp_table_v1()") > > > Reported-by: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > > > Tested-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> > > Thanks. > > Rafael: Please apply this one directly for 5.10-rc. Thanks. Rafael: Ping.
Hi Viresh, On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The patch missed returning 0 early in case of success and hence the > static OPPs got removed by mistake. Fix it. > > Fixes: 90d46d71cce2 ("opp: Handle multiple calls for same OPP table in _of_add_opp_table_v1()") > Reported-by: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> This revives cpufreq on R-Car Gen2, and fixes a later s2ram regression in commit dc279ac6e5b4e06e ("cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly"), where the PMIC is accessesed while the I2C controller is still suspended. Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > --- a/drivers/opp/of.c > +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c > @@ -944,6 +944,8 @@ static int _of_add_opp_table_v1(struct device *dev, struct opp_table *opp_table) > nr -= 2; > } > > + return 0; > + > remove_static_opp: > _opp_remove_all_static(opp_table); > > -- > 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c index 874b58756220..9faeb83e4b32 100644 --- a/drivers/opp/of.c +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c @@ -944,6 +944,8 @@ static int _of_add_opp_table_v1(struct device *dev, struct opp_table *opp_table) nr -= 2; } + return 0; + remove_static_opp: _opp_remove_all_static(opp_table);
The patch missed returning 0 early in case of success and hence the static OPPs got removed by mistake. Fix it. Fixes: 90d46d71cce2 ("opp: Handle multiple calls for same OPP table in _of_add_opp_table_v1()") Reported-by: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/opp/of.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)