@@ -136,9 +136,10 @@ void restore_astate(int cpu)
static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
const u32 *max_freqp;
u32 max_freq;
- int i, cur_astate;
+ int cur_astate;
struct resource res;
struct device_node *cpu, *dn;
int err = -ENODEV;
@@ -197,10 +198,9 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
pr_debug("initializing frequency table\n");
/* initialize frequency table */
- for (i=0; pas_freqs[i].frequency!=CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- pas_freqs[i].frequency =
- get_astate_freq(pas_freqs[i].driver_data) * 100000;
- pr_debug("%d: %d\n", i, pas_freqs[i].frequency);
+ cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, pas_freqs) {
+ pos->frequency = get_astate_freq(pos->driver_data) * 100000;
+ pr_debug("%lu: %d\n", pos - pas_freqs, pos->frequency);
}
cur_astate = get_cur_astate(policy->cpu);
The cpufreq core supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it. It should have no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> --- Please note that I was no able to compile test this patch due to lack of cross compiler. drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)