diff mbox

[4/7] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Simplify code in intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate

Message ID 5396207D.7030704@semaphore.gr (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Stratos Karafotis June 9, 2014, 9 p.m. UTC
Simplify the code by removing the inline functions
pstate_increase and pstate_decrease and use directly the
intel_pstate_set_pstate.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 26 +++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Comments

Viresh Kumar June 10, 2014, 5:27 a.m. UTC | #1
On 10 June 2014 02:30, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
> Simplify the code by removing the inline functions
> pstate_increase and pstate_decrease and use directly the
> intel_pstate_set_pstate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 26 +++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 3a49269..26a0262 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -588,21 +588,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_set_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int pstate)
>         pstate_funcs.set(cpu, pstate);
>  }
>
> -static inline void intel_pstate_pstate_increase(struct cpudata *cpu, int steps)
> -{
> -       int target;
> -       target = cpu->pstate.current_pstate + steps;
> -
> -       intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, target);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(struct cpudata *cpu, int steps)
> -{
> -       int target;
> -       target = cpu->pstate.current_pstate - steps;
> -       intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, target);
> -}
> -
>  static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(struct cpudata *cpu)
>  {
>         cpu->pstate.min_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_min();
> @@ -695,20 +680,15 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
>  static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
>  {
>         struct _pid *pid;
> -       signed int ctl = 0;
> -       int steps;
> +       signed int ctl;
>
>         pid = &cpu->pid;
>         intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(cpu);
>
>         ctl = pid_calc(pid, cpu->sample.busy_scaled);
>
> -       steps = abs(ctl);
> -
> -       if (ctl < 0)
> -               intel_pstate_pstate_increase(cpu, steps);
> -       else
> -               intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(cpu, steps);
> +       /* Negative values of ctl increase the pstate and vice versa */
> +       intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
>  }

I am not very good at this driver but there is some obvious functional
change here. Earlier we used to pass
'cpu->pstate.current_pstate {-|+} steps' and now you are doing '-ctl' only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Stratos Karafotis June 10, 2014, 2:51 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10/06/2014 08:27 ??, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10 June 2014 02:30, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
>> Simplify the code by removing the inline functions
>> pstate_increase and pstate_decrease and use directly the
>> intel_pstate_set_pstate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 26 +++-----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> index 3a49269..26a0262 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> @@ -588,21 +588,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_set_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int pstate)
>>         pstate_funcs.set(cpu, pstate);
>>  }
>>
>> -static inline void intel_pstate_pstate_increase(struct cpudata *cpu, int steps)
>> -{
>> -       int target;
>> -       target = cpu->pstate.current_pstate + steps;
>> -
>> -       intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, target);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static inline void intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(struct cpudata *cpu, int steps)
>> -{
>> -       int target;
>> -       target = cpu->pstate.current_pstate - steps;
>> -       intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, target);
>> -}
>> -
>>  static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(struct cpudata *cpu)
>>  {
>>         cpu->pstate.min_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_min();
>> @@ -695,20 +680,15 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
>>  static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
>>  {
>>         struct _pid *pid;
>> -       signed int ctl = 0;
>> -       int steps;
>> +       signed int ctl;
>>
>>         pid = &cpu->pid;
>>         intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(cpu);
>>
>>         ctl = pid_calc(pid, cpu->sample.busy_scaled);
>>
>> -       steps = abs(ctl);
>> -
>> -       if (ctl < 0)
>> -               intel_pstate_pstate_increase(cpu, steps);
>> -       else
>> -               intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(cpu, steps);
>> +       /* Negative values of ctl increase the pstate and vice versa */
>> +       intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
>>  }
> 
> I am not very good at this driver but there is some obvious functional
> change here. Earlier we used to pass
> 'cpu->pstate.current_pstate {-|+} steps' and now you are doing '-ctl' only
> 

The original code is:	

	if (ctl < 0)
		intel_pstate_pstate_increase(cpu, steps);
	else
		intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(cpu, steps);
		
Without inlines functions intel_pstate_pstate_increase() and
intel_pstate_pstate_decrease() we get:

	if (ctl < 0)
		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate + steps);
	else
		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - steps);

	
But steps = abs(ctl), so:

	if (ctl < 0)
		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate + abs(ctl));
	else
		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - abs(ctl));
	
By definition, abs(ctl) = ctl if ctl >= 0, -ctl if ctl < 0. Thus:

	if (ctl < 0)
		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate + (-ctl));
	else
		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);

And:
	if (ctl < 0)
		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
	else
		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);

Finally remove the unnecessary if statement.		
	intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);

So, this is equivalent with the original code.

Thanks,
Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
dirk.brandewie@gmail.com June 10, 2014, 5:07 p.m. UTC | #3
On 06/10/2014 07:51 AM, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 08:27 ??, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 10 June 2014 02:30, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
>>> Simplify the code by removing the inline functions
>>> pstate_increase and pstate_decrease and use directly the
>>> intel_pstate_set_pstate.
>>>

Doesn't apply without your scaled_busy change spin this patch with
out the scaled_busy change and explain the change more fully in the
commit message to cover Viresh's question and I am good with this change.


>>> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 26 +++-----------------------
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>>> index 3a49269..26a0262 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>>> @@ -588,21 +588,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_set_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int pstate)
>>>          pstate_funcs.set(cpu, pstate);
>>>   }
>>>
>>> -static inline void intel_pstate_pstate_increase(struct cpudata *cpu, int steps)
>>> -{
>>> -       int target;
>>> -       target = cpu->pstate.current_pstate + steps;
>>> -
>>> -       intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, target);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static inline void intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(struct cpudata *cpu, int steps)
>>> -{
>>> -       int target;
>>> -       target = cpu->pstate.current_pstate - steps;
>>> -       intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, target);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>   static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(struct cpudata *cpu)
>>>   {
>>>          cpu->pstate.min_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_min();
>>> @@ -695,20 +680,15 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
>>>   static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
>>>   {
>>>          struct _pid *pid;
>>> -       signed int ctl = 0;
>>> -       int steps;
>>> +       signed int ctl;
>>>
>>>          pid = &cpu->pid;
>>>          intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(cpu);
>>>
>>>          ctl = pid_calc(pid, cpu->sample.busy_scaled);
>>>
>>> -       steps = abs(ctl);
>>> -
>>> -       if (ctl < 0)
>>> -               intel_pstate_pstate_increase(cpu, steps);
>>> -       else
>>> -               intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(cpu, steps);
>>> +       /* Negative values of ctl increase the pstate and vice versa */
>>> +       intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
>>>   }
>>
>> I am not very good at this driver but there is some obvious functional
>> change here. Earlier we used to pass
>> 'cpu->pstate.current_pstate {-|+} steps' and now you are doing '-ctl' only
>>
>
> The original code is:	
>
> 	if (ctl < 0)
> 		intel_pstate_pstate_increase(cpu, steps);
> 	else
> 		intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(cpu, steps);
> 		
> Without inlines functions intel_pstate_pstate_increase() and
> intel_pstate_pstate_decrease() we get:
>
> 	if (ctl < 0)
> 		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate + steps);
> 	else
> 		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - steps);
>
> 	
> But steps = abs(ctl), so:
>
> 	if (ctl < 0)
> 		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate + abs(ctl));
> 	else
> 		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - abs(ctl));
> 	
> By definition, abs(ctl) = ctl if ctl >= 0, -ctl if ctl < 0. Thus:
>
> 	if (ctl < 0)
> 		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate + (-ctl));
> 	else
> 		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
>
> And:
> 	if (ctl < 0)
> 		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
> 	else
> 		intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
>
> Finally remove the unnecessary if statement.		
> 	intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
>
> So, this is equivalent with the original code.
>
> Thanks,
> Stratos
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Stratos Karafotis June 10, 2014, 5:48 p.m. UTC | #4
On 10/06/2014 08:07 ??, Dirk Brandewie wrote:
> On 06/10/2014 07:51 AM, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>> On 10/06/2014 08:27 ??, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 10 June 2014 02:30, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
>>>> Simplify the code by removing the inline functions
>>>> pstate_increase and pstate_decrease and use directly the
>>>> intel_pstate_set_pstate.
>>>>
> 
> Doesn't apply without your scaled_busy change spin this patch with
> out the scaled_busy change and explain the change more fully in the
> commit message to cover Viresh's question and I am good with this change.
> 
> 

OK, I will.

Thanks,
Stratos

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 3a49269..26a0262 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -588,21 +588,6 @@  static void intel_pstate_set_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int pstate)
 	pstate_funcs.set(cpu, pstate);
 }
 
-static inline void intel_pstate_pstate_increase(struct cpudata *cpu, int steps)
-{
-	int target;
-	target = cpu->pstate.current_pstate + steps;
-
-	intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, target);
-}
-
-static inline void intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(struct cpudata *cpu, int steps)
-{
-	int target;
-	target = cpu->pstate.current_pstate - steps;
-	intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, target);
-}
-
 static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(struct cpudata *cpu)
 {
 	cpu->pstate.min_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_min();
@@ -695,20 +680,15 @@  static inline void intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(struct cpudata *cpu)
 static inline void intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
 {
 	struct _pid *pid;
-	signed int ctl = 0;
-	int steps;
+	signed int ctl;
 
 	pid = &cpu->pid;
 	intel_pstate_calc_scaled_busy(cpu);
 
 	ctl = pid_calc(pid, cpu->sample.busy_scaled);
 
-	steps = abs(ctl);
-
-	if (ctl < 0)
-		intel_pstate_pstate_increase(cpu, steps);
-	else
-		intel_pstate_pstate_decrease(cpu, steps);
+	/* Negative values of ctl increase the pstate and vice versa */
+	intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.current_pstate - ctl);
 }
 
 static void intel_pstate_timer_func(unsigned long __data)