@@ -65,9 +65,6 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
freqs.old = policy->cur;
freqs.new = target_freq;
- if (freqs.new == freqs.old)
- goto out;
-
/*
* The policy max have been changed so that we cannot get proper
* old_index with cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). Thus, ignore
@@ -151,13 +148,9 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- unsigned int target_freq,
- unsigned int relation)
+static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table;
- unsigned int index;
- unsigned int new_freq;
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
@@ -165,15 +158,7 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (frequency_locked)
goto out;
- if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table,
- target_freq, relation, &index)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
-
- new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency;
-
- ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(new_freq);
+ ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(freq_table[index].frequency);
out:
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
@@ -247,7 +232,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
- .target = exynos_target,
+ .target_index = exynos_target,
.get = exynos_getspeed,
.init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init,
.exit = cpufreq_generic_exit,
@@ -214,27 +214,17 @@ static unsigned int exynos_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
return dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
}
-static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- unsigned int target_freq,
- unsigned int relation)
+static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
- unsigned int index, tmp;
- int ret = 0, i;
+ unsigned int tmp;
+ int i;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = dvfs_info->freq_table;
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
- ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table,
- target_freq, relation, &index);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
freqs.old = dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
- if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
- goto out;
-
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Set the target frequency in all C0_3_PSTATE register */
@@ -245,9 +235,8 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
__raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + i * 4);
}
-out:
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static void exynos_cpufreq_work(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -325,7 +314,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
- .target = exynos_target,
+ .target_index = exynos_target,
.get = exynos_getspeed,
.init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init,
.exit = cpufreq_generic_exit,
This patch converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for this driver. CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and will pass index to it. Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 21 +++------------------ drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 21 +++++---------------- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)