diff mbox

[RESEND,V7,5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver

Message ID ac0c9c0edf9a3a48d8de7a5c07b16b771871796e.1495546845.git.stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Steve Twiss May 23, 2017, 1:40 p.m. UTC
From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>

Regulator support for the DA9061 is added into the DA9062 regulator driver.
 
The regulators for DA9061 differ from those of DA9062.
A new DA9061 enumeration list for the LDOs and Bucks supported by this
device is added. Regulator information added: the old regulator
information for DA9062 is renamed from local_regulator_info[] to
local_da9062_regulator_info[] and a new array is added to support
local_da9061_regulator_info[].

The probe() function switches on the da9062_compatible_types enumeration
and configures the correct da9062_regulator_info array and number of
regulator entries.

Kconfig is updated to reflect support for DA9061 and DA9062 regulators.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>

---
Hi,

This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
against x86_64.

The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
acceptance, could you please let me know?

Regards,
Steve


This patch applies against linux-next and v4.12-rc2

v6 -> v7
 - NO CODE CHANGE
 - Compile tested ARCH=x86_64

v5 -> v6
 - Rebased from v4.9 to v4.11-rc3
 - Modify Copyright to match Dialog latest legal statement

v4 -> v5
 - Rebased from v4.8 to v4.9
 - NO CODE CHANGE

v3 -> v4
 - NO CODE CHANGE
 - Patch renamed from [PATCH V3 6/9] to [PATCH V4 5/8]

v2 -> v3
 - NO CODE CHANGE
 - Patch renamed from [PATCH V2 06/10] to [PATCH V3 6/9]
 - Added Ack from Mark Brown

v1 -> v2
 - Patch renamed from [PATCH V1 02/10] to [PATCH V2 06/10] -- these
   changes were made to fix checkpatch warnings caused by the patch
   set dependency order
 - Updated header to use DA9061 and DA9062

Hi,

I have updated copyright header slightly to match Dialog's legal
expectation, but there are no code changes for this version PATCH V7.

As previously:

These changes depend on a header file provided as part of an earlier
patch [V7,4/7] mfd: da9061: MFD core support from this set. The regulator
probe() switches on the chip_type which uses enum da9062_compatible_types
in core.h from this patch.

Regards,
Steve Twiss, Dialog Semiconductor


 drivers/regulator/Kconfig            |   4 +-
 drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c | 303 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown May 23, 2017, 5:17 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:

> This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
> I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
> code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
> slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
> against x86_64.

> The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
> by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
> acceptance, could you please let me know?

Given that I've acked this and it depends on the MFD changes I'd have
expected Lee to apply it.  If nothing else happens I can apply it after
the next merge window, otherwise either Lee needs to send me a pull
request for the MFD change so I've got the dependency or he needs to
apply this.
Steve Twiss May 24, 2017, 8:12 a.m. UTC | #2
On 23 May 2017 18:17 Mark Brown
> To: Steve Twiss
> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver
> 
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> 
> > This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
> > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
> > I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
> > code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
> > slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
> > against x86_64.
> 
> > The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
> > by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
> > acceptance, could you please let me know?
> 
> Given that I've acked this and it depends on the MFD changes I'd have
> expected Lee to apply it.  If nothing else happens I can apply it after
> the next merge window, otherwise either Lee needs to send me a pull
> request for the MFD change so I've got the dependency or he needs to
> apply this.

Hi Mark,

Thanks,
No problem, just some minor administration.

@Lee
Could you please send Mark a pull request for the regulator component to the
DA9062/61 changes [PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator
driver.

Regards,
Steve
Lee Jones May 24, 2017, 8:32 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> 
> > This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
> > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
> > I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
> > code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
> > slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
> > against x86_64.
> 
> > The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
> > by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
> > acceptance, could you please let me know?
> 
> Given that I've acked this and it depends on the MFD changes I'd have
> expected Lee to apply it.  If nothing else happens I can apply it after
> the next merge window, otherwise either Lee needs to send me a pull
> request for the MFD change so I've got the dependency or he needs to
> apply this.

Plan is to push this through the MFD tree.

Do you want a PR for this one?
Lee Jones May 24, 2017, 8:40 a.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Steve Twiss wrote:

> On 23 May 2017 18:17 Mark Brown
> > To: Steve Twiss
> > Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator driver
> > 
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:40:45PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> > 
> > > This patch was Acked by Mark Brown, a long time ago, way back in Oct 2016
> > > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9397787/).
> > > I have kept Mark Brown's Ack attached because there have been no real
> > > code changes since then, but I have recently updated the copyright header
> > > slightly, rebased the code (no changes necessary) and compile tested it
> > > against x86_64.
> > 
> > > The MFD files which this patch depended on were accepted into linux-next
> > > by Lee Jones last week. If there is anything in the way of this patch
> > > acceptance, could you please let me know?
> > 
> > Given that I've acked this and it depends on the MFD changes I'd have
> > expected Lee to apply it.  If nothing else happens I can apply it after
> > the next merge window, otherwise either Lee needs to send me a pull
> > request for the MFD change so I've got the dependency or he needs to
> > apply this.
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Thanks,
> No problem, just some minor administration.
> 
> @Lee
> Could you please send Mark a pull request for the regulator component to the
> DA9062/61 changes [PATCH V7 5/7] regulator: da9061: BUCK and LDO regulator
> driver.

That wasn't one of the options. ;)
Mark Brown May 24, 2017, 10:10 a.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:32:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> Plan is to push this through the MFD tree.

Great, thanks.

> Do you want a PR for this one?

Ideally but it's not super urgent if (I've started handling these by
keeping a note of the pull information and only merging if there's an
actual problem, that way there's less cross tree merges show up when I
send stuff to Linus).
Lee Jones May 30, 2017, 9:17 a.m. UTC | #6
On Wed, 24 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:32:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > Plan is to push this through the MFD tree.
> 
> Great, thanks.

Just taking a look at this now.  It looks like the dependency:

  656211b1dfb9 mfd: Add support for DA9061

... is now in Mainline.  Therefore it should be okay to take this
directly through the Regulator repo.
Mark Brown June 6, 2017, 7:02 p.m. UTC | #7
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:17:59AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2017, Mark Brown wrote:

> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:32:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> > > Plan is to push this through the MFD tree.

> > Great, thanks.

> Just taking a look at this now.  It looks like the dependency:

>   656211b1dfb9 mfd: Add support for DA9061

> ... is now in Mainline.  Therefore it should be okay to take this
> directly through the Regulator repo.

OK, can you resend please Steve?
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
index 48db87d..9d2222e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
@@ -214,11 +214,11 @@  config REGULATOR_DA9055
 	  will be called da9055-regulator.
 
 config REGULATOR_DA9062
-	tristate "Dialog Semiconductor DA9062 regulators"
+	tristate "Dialog Semiconductor DA9061/62 regulators"
 	depends on MFD_DA9062
 	help
 	  Say y here to support the BUCKs and LDOs regulators found on
-	  DA9062 PMICs.
+	  DA9061 and DA9062 PMICs.
 
 	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
 	  will be called da9062-regulator.
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
index 0638c8b..34a70d9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 
 /*
- * da9062-regulator.c - REGULATOR device driver for DA9062
- * Copyright (C) 2015  Dialog Semiconductor Ltd.
+ * Regulator device driver for DA9061 and DA9062.
+ * Copyright (C) 2015-2017  Dialog Semiconductor
  *
  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
@@ -28,6 +28,17 @@ 
 
 /* Regulator IDs */
 enum {
+	DA9061_ID_BUCK1,
+	DA9061_ID_BUCK2,
+	DA9061_ID_BUCK3,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO1,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO2,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO3,
+	DA9061_ID_LDO4,
+	DA9061_MAX_REGULATORS,
+};
+
+enum {
 	DA9062_ID_BUCK1,
 	DA9062_ID_BUCK2,
 	DA9062_ID_BUCK3,
@@ -88,15 +99,21 @@  enum {
 
 /* Regulator operations */
 
-/* Current limits array (in uA) BUCK1 and BUCK3.
-   Entry indexes corresponds to register values. */
+/* Current limits array (in uA)
+ * - DA9061_ID_[BUCK1|BUCK3]
+ * - DA9062_ID_[BUCK1|BUCK2|BUCK4]
+ * Entry indexes corresponds to register values.
+ */
 static const int da9062_buck_a_limits[] = {
 	 500000,  600000,  700000,  800000,  900000, 1000000, 1100000, 1200000,
 	1300000, 1400000, 1500000, 1600000, 1700000, 1800000, 1900000, 2000000
 };
 
-/* Current limits array (in uA) for BUCK2.
-   Entry indexes corresponds to register values. */
+/* Current limits array (in uA)
+ * - DA9061_ID_BUCK2
+ * - DA9062_ID_BUCK3
+ * Entry indexes corresponds to register values.
+ */
 static const int da9062_buck_b_limits[] = {
 	1500000, 1600000, 1700000, 1800000, 1900000, 2000000, 2100000, 2200000,
 	2300000, 2400000, 2500000, 2600000, 2700000, 2800000, 2900000, 3000000
@@ -405,8 +422,254 @@  static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	.set_suspend_mode	= da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode,
 };
 
-/* Regulator information */
-static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_regulator_info[] = {
+/* DA9061 Regulator information */
+static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK1,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 BUCK1",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("buck1"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_buck_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (300) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (10) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((1570) - (300))/(10) + 1,
+		.current_limits = da9062_buck_a_limits,
+		.n_current_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_buck_a_limits),
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_BUCK1_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_BUCK1_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK1_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VBUCK1_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK1_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK1_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK1_B,
+		.mode = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK1_CFG,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_MODE_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_MODE_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK1_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VBUCK1_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.ilimit = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK_ILIM_C,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK1_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK2,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 BUCK2",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("buck2"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_buck_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (800) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (20) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3340) - (800))/(20) + 1,
+		.current_limits = da9062_buck_b_limits,
+		.n_current_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_buck_b_limits),
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_BUCK3_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_BUCK3_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK3_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VBUCK3_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK3_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK3_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK3_B,
+		.mode = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK3_CFG,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_MODE_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_MODE_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK3_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VBUCK3_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.ilimit = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK_ILIM_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK3_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK3,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 BUCK3",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("buck3"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_buck_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (530) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (10) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((1800) - (530))/(10) + 1,
+		.current_limits = da9062_buck_a_limits,
+		.n_current_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_buck_a_limits),
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_BUCK4_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_BUCK4_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK4_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VBUCK4_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK4_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VBUCK4_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VBUCK4_B,
+		.mode = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK4_CFG,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_MODE_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_MODE_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK4_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VBUCK4_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.ilimit = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK_ILIM_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_BUCK4_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO1,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO1",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo1"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO1_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO1_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO1_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO1_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO1_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO1_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO1_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO2,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO2",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo2"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (600))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO2_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO2_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO2_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO2_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO2_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO2_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO2_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO3,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO3",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo3"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO3_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO3_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO3_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO3_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO3_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO3_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO3_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+	{
+		.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO4,
+		.desc.name = "DA9061 LDO4",
+		.desc.of_match = of_match_ptr("ldo4"),
+		.desc.regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
+		.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
+		.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
+		.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
+		.desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+		.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO4_CONT,
+		.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO4_EN_MASK,
+		.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
+		.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A_MASK,
+		.desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+		.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_A_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO4_B,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_B_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_B_MASK)) - 1),
+		.suspend_vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO4_B,
+		.suspend = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_DVC_1,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO4_SEL_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_VLDO4_SEL_MASK)) - 1),
+		.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
+			__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
+			sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+			__builtin_clz((DA9062AA_LDO4_ILIM_MASK)) - 1),
+	},
+};
+
+/* DA9062 Regulator information */
+static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
 	{
 		.desc.id = DA9062_ID_BUCK1,
 		.desc.name = "DA9062 BUCK1",
@@ -727,17 +990,33 @@  static int da9062_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct da9062_regulators *regulators;
 	struct da9062_regulator *regl;
 	struct regulator_config config = { };
+	const struct da9062_regulator_info *rinfo;
 	int irq, n, ret;
 	size_t size;
+	int max_regulators;
+
+	switch (chip->chip_type) {
+	case COMPAT_TYPE_DA9061:
+		max_regulators = DA9061_MAX_REGULATORS;
+		rinfo = local_da9061_regulator_info;
+		break;
+	case COMPAT_TYPE_DA9062:
+		max_regulators = DA9062_MAX_REGULATORS;
+		rinfo = local_da9062_regulator_info;
+		break;
+	default:
+		dev_err(chip->dev, "Unrecognised chip type\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	/* Allocate memory required by usable regulators */
 	size = sizeof(struct da9062_regulators) +
-		DA9062_MAX_REGULATORS * sizeof(struct da9062_regulator);
+		max_regulators * sizeof(struct da9062_regulator);
 	regulators = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!regulators)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	regulators->n_regulators = DA9062_MAX_REGULATORS;
+	regulators->n_regulators = max_regulators;
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, regulators);
 
 	n = 0;
@@ -745,7 +1024,7 @@  static int da9062_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		/* Initialise regulator structure */
 		regl = &regulators->regulator[n];
 		regl->hw = chip;
-		regl->info = &local_regulator_info[n];
+		regl->info = &rinfo[n];
 		regl->desc = regl->info->desc;
 		regl->desc.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
 		regl->desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
@@ -836,6 +1115,6 @@  static void __exit da9062_regulator_cleanup(void)
 
 /* Module information */
 MODULE_AUTHOR("S Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("REGULATOR device driver for Dialog DA9062");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("REGULATOR device driver for Dialog DA9062 and DA9061");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_ALIAS("platform:da9062-regulators");