diff mbox

thermal: ti-soc-thermal: fix compilation warnings when !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

Message ID alpine.DEB.2.02.1502062259190.3767@utopia.booyaka.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Eduardo Valentin
Headers show

Commit Message

Paul Walmsley Feb. 7, 2015, 12:17 a.m. UTC
When CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n, the following compilation warnings appear:

drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1478:12: warning: ‘ti_bandgap_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 static int ti_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev)
            ^
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1492:12: warning: ‘ti_bandgap_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 static int ti_bandgap_resume(struct device *dev)

A few years ago, suspend/resume-related code was protected by CONFIG_PM.  
But that was changed and now it's protected by CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.  Fix the 
warnings by converting the preprocessor test in the TI bandgap thermal 
sensor driver from testing CONFIG_PM to testing CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.

Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---

Non-critical.  Targeted for either v3.20-rc1 or v3.21-rc1.

Basic test reports for a series that includes this patch (and a few other 
unrelated warning cleanups) is available here:

http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/fix-omap-warnings-v3.21/20150206154619/

Compare to:

http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc7/20150204213018/

 drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Nishanth Menon Feb. 9, 2015, 3 p.m. UTC | #1
On 00:17-20150207, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> 
> When CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n, the following compilation warnings appear:
> 
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1478:12: warning: ‘ti_bandgap_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int ti_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev)
>             ^
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1492:12: warning: ‘ti_bandgap_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int ti_bandgap_resume(struct device *dev)
> 
> A few years ago, suspend/resume-related code was protected by CONFIG_PM.  
> But that was changed and now it's protected by CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.  Fix the 
> warnings by converting the preprocessor test in the TI bandgap thermal 
> sensor driver from testing CONFIG_PM to testing CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> 
> Non-critical.  Targeted for either v3.20-rc1 or v3.21-rc1.
> 
> Basic test reports for a series that includes this patch (and a few other 
> unrelated warning cleanups) is available here:
> 
> http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/fix-omap-warnings-v3.21/20150206154619/
> 
> Compare to:
> 
> http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc7/20150204213018/
> 
>  drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> index 634b6ce0e63a..62a5d449c388 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static int ti_bandgap_save_ctxt(struct ti_bandgap *bgp)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -- 
> 2.1.4


I am a little confused:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5792411/ was already posted. would
you suggest improvements?
Paul Walmsley Feb. 9, 2015, 3:53 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Nishanth Menon wrote:

> On 00:17-20150207, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > 
> > When CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n, the following compilation warnings appear:
> > 
> > drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1478:12: warning: ‘ti_bandgap_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >  static int ti_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >             ^
> > drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c:1492:12: warning: ‘ti_bandgap_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >  static int ti_bandgap_resume(struct device *dev)
> > 
> > A few years ago, suspend/resume-related code was protected by CONFIG_PM.  
> > But that was changed and now it's protected by CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.  Fix the 
> > warnings by converting the preprocessor test in the TI bandgap thermal 
> > sensor driver from testing CONFIG_PM to testing CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> > Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > 
> > Non-critical.  Targeted for either v3.20-rc1 or v3.21-rc1.
> > 
> > Basic test reports for a series that includes this patch (and a few other 
> > unrelated warning cleanups) is available here:
> > 
> > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/fix-omap-warnings-v3.21/20150206154619/
> > 
> > Compare to:
> > 
> > http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.19-rc7/20150204213018/
> > 
> >  drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> > index 634b6ce0e63a..62a5d449c388 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> > @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> >  static int ti_bandgap_save_ctxt(struct ti_bandgap *bgp)
> >  {
> >  	int i;
> > -- 
> > 2.1.4
> 
> 
> I am a little confused:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5792411/ was already posted. would
> you suggest improvements?

Oh, nothing to be confused by, I just missed the earlier patch.  I 
withdraw mine.


- Paul
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
index 634b6ce0e63a..62a5d449c388 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
@@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@  int ti_bandgap_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int ti_bandgap_save_ctxt(struct ti_bandgap *bgp)
 {
 	int i;