diff mbox series

[V8,06/14] rust: Add bare minimal bindings for clk framework

Message ID c68081e18d939aefc7f6dac798df6b72e81bba4b.1738832118.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New
Delegated to: viresh kumar
Headers show
Series Rust bindings for cpufreq and OPP core + sample driver | expand

Commit Message

Viresh Kumar Feb. 6, 2025, 9:28 a.m. UTC
This adds very basic bindings for the clk framework, implements only
clk_get() and clk_put(). These are the bare minimum bindings required
for many users and are simple enough to add in the first attempt.

These will be used by Rust based cpufreq / OPP core to begin with.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 MAINTAINERS                     |  1 +
 rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |  1 +
 rust/kernel/clk.rs              | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 rust/kernel/lib.rs              |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 rust/kernel/clk.rs

Comments

Danilo Krummrich Feb. 6, 2025, 11:49 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 02:58:27PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This adds very basic bindings for the clk framework, implements only
> clk_get() and clk_put(). These are the bare minimum bindings required
> for many users and are simple enough to add in the first attempt.
> 
> These will be used by Rust based cpufreq / OPP core to begin with.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                     |  1 +
>  rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |  1 +
>  rust/kernel/clk.rs              | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  rust/kernel/lib.rs              |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 rust/kernel/clk.rs
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index ff4511914e0a..604717065476 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -5780,6 +5780,7 @@ F:	include/dt-bindings/clock/
>  F:	include/linux/clk-pr*
>  F:	include/linux/clk/
>  F:	include/linux/of_clk.h
> +F:	rust/kernel/clk.rs
>  X:	drivers/clk/clkdev.c
>  
>  COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM CLIENT (CIFS and SMB3)
> diff --git a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> index 59b4bc49d039..4eadcf645df0 100644
> --- a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> +++ b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/blk-mq.h>
>  #include <linux/blk_types.h>
>  #include <linux/blkdev.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>  #include <linux/cred.h>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/clk.rs b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..123cdb43b115
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +//! Clock abstractions.
> +//!
> +//! C header: [`include/linux/clk.h`](srctree/include/linux/clk.h)
> +
> +use crate::{
> +    bindings,
> +    device::Device,
> +    error::{from_err_ptr, Result},
> +    prelude::*,
> +};
> +
> +use core::ptr;
> +
> +/// A simple implementation of `struct clk` from the C code.
> +#[repr(transparent)]
> +pub struct Clk(*mut bindings::clk);

Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.

> +
> +impl Clk {
> +    /// Creates `Clk` instance for a device and a connection id.
> +    pub fn new(dev: &Device, name: Option<&CStr>) -> Result<Self> {
> +        let con_id = if let Some(name) = name {
> +            name.as_ptr() as *const _
> +        } else {
> +            ptr::null()
> +        };
> +
> +        // SAFETY: It is safe to call `clk_get()`, on a device pointer earlier received from the C
> +        // code.
> +        Ok(Self(from_err_ptr(unsafe {
> +            bindings::clk_get(dev.as_raw(), con_id)
> +        })?))
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Obtain the raw `struct clk *`.
> +    pub fn as_raw(&self) -> *mut bindings::clk {
> +        self.0
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +impl Drop for Clk {
> +    fn drop(&mut self) {
> +        // SAFETY: By the type invariants, we know that `self` owns a reference, so it is safe to
> +        // relinquish it now.
> +        unsafe { bindings::clk_put(self.0) };
> +    }
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/lib.rs b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> index ccbf7fa087a0..77d3b1f82154 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
>  pub mod block;
>  #[doc(hidden)]
>  pub mod build_assert;
> +#[cfg(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)]
> +pub mod clk;
>  pub mod cpu;
>  pub mod cpumask;
>  pub mod cred;
> -- 
> 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514
> 
>
Danilo Krummrich Feb. 6, 2025, 11:52 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:49:14PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 02:58:27PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > This adds very basic bindings for the clk framework, implements only
> > clk_get() and clk_put(). These are the bare minimum bindings required
> > for many users and are simple enough to add in the first attempt.
> > 
> > These will be used by Rust based cpufreq / OPP core to begin with.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS                     |  1 +
> >  rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |  1 +
> >  rust/kernel/clk.rs              | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  rust/kernel/lib.rs              |  2 ++
> >  4 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 rust/kernel/clk.rs
> > 
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index ff4511914e0a..604717065476 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -5780,6 +5780,7 @@ F:	include/dt-bindings/clock/
> >  F:	include/linux/clk-pr*
> >  F:	include/linux/clk/
> >  F:	include/linux/of_clk.h
> > +F:	rust/kernel/clk.rs
> >  X:	drivers/clk/clkdev.c
> >  
> >  COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM CLIENT (CIFS and SMB3)
> > diff --git a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> > index 59b4bc49d039..4eadcf645df0 100644
> > --- a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> > +++ b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/blk-mq.h>
> >  #include <linux/blk_types.h>
> >  #include <linux/blkdev.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> >  #include <linux/cpu.h>
> >  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> >  #include <linux/cred.h>
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/clk.rs b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..123cdb43b115
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
> > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +//! Clock abstractions.
> > +//!
> > +//! C header: [`include/linux/clk.h`](srctree/include/linux/clk.h)
> > +
> > +use crate::{
> > +    bindings,
> > +    device::Device,
> > +    error::{from_err_ptr, Result},
> > +    prelude::*,
> > +};
> > +
> > +use core::ptr;
> > +
> > +/// A simple implementation of `struct clk` from the C code.
> > +#[repr(transparent)]
> > +pub struct Clk(*mut bindings::clk);
> 
> Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.

Sorry, I meant NonNull<bindings::clk>.

> 
> > +
> > +impl Clk {
> > +    /// Creates `Clk` instance for a device and a connection id.
> > +    pub fn new(dev: &Device, name: Option<&CStr>) -> Result<Self> {
> > +        let con_id = if let Some(name) = name {
> > +            name.as_ptr() as *const _
> > +        } else {
> > +            ptr::null()
> > +        };
> > +
> > +        // SAFETY: It is safe to call `clk_get()`, on a device pointer earlier received from the C
> > +        // code.
> > +        Ok(Self(from_err_ptr(unsafe {
> > +            bindings::clk_get(dev.as_raw(), con_id)
> > +        })?))
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /// Obtain the raw `struct clk *`.
> > +    pub fn as_raw(&self) -> *mut bindings::clk {
> > +        self.0
> > +    }
> > +}
> > +
> > +impl Drop for Clk {
> > +    fn drop(&mut self) {
> > +        // SAFETY: By the type invariants, we know that `self` owns a reference, so it is safe to
> > +        // relinquish it now.
> > +        unsafe { bindings::clk_put(self.0) };
> > +    }
> > +}
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/lib.rs b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> > index ccbf7fa087a0..77d3b1f82154 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
> >  pub mod block;
> >  #[doc(hidden)]
> >  pub mod build_assert;
> > +#[cfg(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)]
> > +pub mod clk;
> >  pub mod cpu;
> >  pub mod cpumask;
> >  pub mod cred;
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514
> > 
> >
Stephen Boyd Feb. 6, 2025, 8:05 p.m. UTC | #3
Quoting Danilo Krummrich (2025-02-06 03:52:41)
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:49:14PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 02:58:27PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/clk.rs b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..123cdb43b115
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +
> > > +//! Clock abstractions.
> > > +//!
> > > +//! C header: [`include/linux/clk.h`](srctree/include/linux/clk.h)
> > > +
> > > +use crate::{
> > > +    bindings,
> > > +    device::Device,
> > > +    error::{from_err_ptr, Result},
> > > +    prelude::*,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +use core::ptr;
> > > +
> > > +/// A simple implementation of `struct clk` from the C code.
> > > +#[repr(transparent)]
> > > +pub struct Clk(*mut bindings::clk);
> > 
> > Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.
> 
> Sorry, I meant NonNull<bindings::clk>.

NULL is a valid clk. It's like "don't care" in the common clk framework
as most clk consumer operations bail out early in that case.
Danilo Krummrich Feb. 6, 2025, 11:11 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:05:59PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Danilo Krummrich (2025-02-06 03:52:41)
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:49:14PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 02:58:27PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/clk.rs b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..123cdb43b115
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +
> > > > +//! Clock abstractions.
> > > > +//!
> > > > +//! C header: [`include/linux/clk.h`](srctree/include/linux/clk.h)
> > > > +
> > > > +use crate::{
> > > > +    bindings,
> > > > +    device::Device,
> > > > +    error::{from_err_ptr, Result},
> > > > +    prelude::*,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +use core::ptr;
> > > > +
> > > > +/// A simple implementation of `struct clk` from the C code.
> > > > +#[repr(transparent)]
> > > > +pub struct Clk(*mut bindings::clk);
> > > 
> > > Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.
> > 
> > Sorry, I meant NonNull<bindings::clk>.
> 
> NULL is a valid clk. It's like "don't care" in the common clk framework

Thanks for clarifying!

> as most clk consumer operations bail out early in that case.

Most? Does that mean NULL isn't *always* valid?
Viresh Kumar Feb. 7, 2025, 9:24 a.m. UTC | #5
On 07-02-25, 00:11, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:05:59PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Danilo Krummrich (2025-02-06 03:52:41)
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:49:14PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 02:58:27PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> > > > > +/// A simple implementation of `struct clk` from the C code.
> > > > > +#[repr(transparent)]
> > > > > +pub struct Clk(*mut bindings::clk);
> > > > 
> > > > Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I meant NonNull<bindings::clk>.
> > 
> > NULL is a valid clk. It's like "don't care" in the common clk framework
> 
> Thanks for clarifying!

> Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.

So it should be this now ?
Viresh Kumar Feb. 7, 2025, 10:43 a.m. UTC | #6
On 07-02-25, 14:54, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-02-25, 00:11, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.
> 
> So it should be this now ?

Also, I should be using ARef and AlwaysRefCounted along with that ? I
am not sure if I can use those with the clk API. Yes, it is refcounted
but there is no direct way of incrementing the refcount unlike other
frameworks. clk_get() accepts a dev pointer and a char pointer,
whereas clk_put() accepts the clk pointer itself.
Danilo Krummrich Feb. 7, 2025, 5:19 p.m. UTC | #7
On 2/7/25 10:24 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-02-25, 00:11, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:05:59PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Danilo Krummrich (2025-02-06 03:52:41)
>>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:49:14PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 02:58:27PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
>>>>>> +/// A simple implementation of `struct clk` from the C code.
>>>>>> +#[repr(transparent)]
>>>>>> +pub struct Clk(*mut bindings::clk);
>>>>>
>>>>> Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I meant NonNull<bindings::clk>.
>>>
>>> NULL is a valid clk. It's like "don't care" in the common clk framework
>>
>> Thanks for clarifying!
> 
>> Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.
> 
> So it should be this now ?

I actually meant NonNull<bindings::clk>, which I corrected in a subsequent mail,
where Stephen pointed out that NULL is a valid value for a struct clk.
Viresh Kumar Feb. 10, 2025, 8:06 a.m. UTC | #8
On 07-02-25, 18:19, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On 2/7/25 10:24 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 07-02-25, 00:11, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:05:59PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > Quoting Danilo Krummrich (2025-02-06 03:52:41)
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:49:14PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 02:58:27PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > 
> > > > > > > +/// A simple implementation of `struct clk` from the C code.
> > > > > > > +#[repr(transparent)]
> > > > > > > +pub struct Clk(*mut bindings::clk);
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sorry, I meant NonNull<bindings::clk>.
> > > > 
> > > > NULL is a valid clk. It's like "don't care" in the common clk framework
> > > 
> > > Thanks for clarifying!
> > 
> > > Guess this should be Opaque<bindings::clk>.
> > 
> > So it should be this now ?
> 
> I actually meant NonNull<bindings::clk>, which I corrected in a subsequent mail,
> where Stephen pointed out that NULL is a valid value for a struct clk.

Ahh okay, so no changes required now. Thanks.
Stephen Boyd Feb. 10, 2025, 10:07 p.m. UTC | #9
Quoting Danilo Krummrich (2025-02-06 15:11:31)
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:05:59PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> 
> > as most clk consumer operations bail out early in that case.
> 
> Most? Does that mean NULL isn't *always* valid?

I'm hedging because the common clk framework is just one implementation
of the clk.h API in the kernel. We still have a couple other
implementations (sadly) where I haven't checked to see what they do if a
NULL pointer is passed in. But NULL should always be a valid clk handle
per the clk.h API documentation, so an implementation that fails at that
is broken.
Daniel Almeida Feb. 17, 2025, 12:19 p.m. UTC | #10
Hi Viresh

> On 6 Feb 2025, at 06:28, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> This adds very basic bindings for the clk framework, implements only
> clk_get() and clk_put(). These are the bare minimum bindings required
> for many users and are simple enough to add in the first attempt.

I am missing clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare.

Otherwise I see no way of enabling and disabling clks. IMHO I would also
consider these as “bare minimum”.

— Daniel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index ff4511914e0a..604717065476 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -5780,6 +5780,7 @@  F:	include/dt-bindings/clock/
 F:	include/linux/clk-pr*
 F:	include/linux/clk/
 F:	include/linux/of_clk.h
+F:	rust/kernel/clk.rs
 X:	drivers/clk/clkdev.c
 
 COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM CLIENT (CIFS and SMB3)
diff --git a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
index 59b4bc49d039..4eadcf645df0 100644
--- a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
+++ b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/blk-mq.h>
 #include <linux/blk_types.h>
 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/cred.h>
diff --git a/rust/kernel/clk.rs b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..123cdb43b115
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rust/kernel/clk.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+//! Clock abstractions.
+//!
+//! C header: [`include/linux/clk.h`](srctree/include/linux/clk.h)
+
+use crate::{
+    bindings,
+    device::Device,
+    error::{from_err_ptr, Result},
+    prelude::*,
+};
+
+use core::ptr;
+
+/// A simple implementation of `struct clk` from the C code.
+#[repr(transparent)]
+pub struct Clk(*mut bindings::clk);
+
+impl Clk {
+    /// Creates `Clk` instance for a device and a connection id.
+    pub fn new(dev: &Device, name: Option<&CStr>) -> Result<Self> {
+        let con_id = if let Some(name) = name {
+            name.as_ptr() as *const _
+        } else {
+            ptr::null()
+        };
+
+        // SAFETY: It is safe to call `clk_get()`, on a device pointer earlier received from the C
+        // code.
+        Ok(Self(from_err_ptr(unsafe {
+            bindings::clk_get(dev.as_raw(), con_id)
+        })?))
+    }
+
+    /// Obtain the raw `struct clk *`.
+    pub fn as_raw(&self) -> *mut bindings::clk {
+        self.0
+    }
+}
+
+impl Drop for Clk {
+    fn drop(&mut self) {
+        // SAFETY: By the type invariants, we know that `self` owns a reference, so it is safe to
+        // relinquish it now.
+        unsafe { bindings::clk_put(self.0) };
+    }
+}
diff --git a/rust/kernel/lib.rs b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
index ccbf7fa087a0..77d3b1f82154 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/lib.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ 
 pub mod block;
 #[doc(hidden)]
 pub mod build_assert;
+#[cfg(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK)]
+pub mod clk;
 pub mod cpu;
 pub mod cpumask;
 pub mod cred;