cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates

Commit Message

Stratos Karafotis Nov. 16, 2016, 7:13 p.m. UTC

The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.

Both increase and decrease happen at steps.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index a48b724..7522ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@  static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
  * sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
  * (default), then we try to decrease frequency
  *
- * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
- * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
+ * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
+ * frequency
  */
 static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {