@@ -678,11 +678,11 @@ static int rt5033_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
psy_cfg.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
psy_cfg.drv_data = charger;
- charger->psy = devm_power_supply_register(&pdev->dev,
+ charger->psy = devm_power_supply_register(charger->dev,
&rt5033_charger_desc,
&psy_cfg);
if (IS_ERR(charger->psy))
- return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(charger->psy),
+ return dev_err_probe(charger->dev, PTR_ERR(charger->psy),
"Failed to register power supply\n");
ret = rt5033_charger_dt_init(charger);
@@ -701,22 +701,22 @@ static int rt5033_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
np_edev = of_get_parent(np_conn);
charger->edev = extcon_find_edev_by_node(np_edev);
if (IS_ERR(charger->edev)) {
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "no extcon device found in device-tree\n");
+ dev_warn(charger->dev, "no extcon device found in device-tree\n");
goto out;
}
- ret = devm_work_autocancel(&pdev->dev, &charger->extcon_work,
+ ret = devm_work_autocancel(charger->dev, &charger->extcon_work,
rt5033_charger_extcon_work);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to initialize extcon work\n");
+ dev_err(charger->dev, "failed to initialize extcon work\n");
return ret;
}
charger->extcon_nb.notifier_call = rt5033_charger_extcon_notifier;
- ret = devm_extcon_register_notifier_all(&pdev->dev, charger->edev,
+ ret = devm_extcon_register_notifier_all(charger->dev, charger->edev,
&charger->extcon_nb);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register extcon notifier\n");
+ dev_err(charger->dev, "failed to register extcon notifier\n");
return ret;
}
out:
At the beginning of the probe function, "charger->dev" is set equal to "&pdev->dev". Therefore it's more clear to subsequently use "charger->dev" instead of "&pdev->dev". Signed-off-by: Jakob Hauser <jahau@rocketmail.com> --- drivers/power/supply/rt5033_charger.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)