From patchwork Wed Jun 21 16:51:05 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Kuai X-Patchwork-Id: 13286876 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51E2EB64D7 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 08:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231727AbjFUIxB (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2023 04:53:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40332 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231751AbjFUIwq (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2023 04:52:46 -0400 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64892E60; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 01:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.143]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QmHMF091gz4f43lb; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:52:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgD3rLBWupJkbVnFMA--.53622S7; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:52:41 +0800 (CST) From: Yu Kuai To: song@kernel.org, xni@redhat.com, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] raid5: fix missing io accounting in raid5_align_endio() Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 00:51:05 +0800 Message-Id: <20230621165110.1498313-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230621165110.1498313-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230621165110.1498313-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgD3rLBWupJkbVnFMA--.53622S7 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxWry7XF4kAFykGF1kCFWDXFb_yoW5Wr1kpa nagF9xXrW5XrW5WFZrK3yDW3WSqwsrKrZ7tFWxX34fta4ayFyvka18Xa4rJry5CFW8ury7 Zw1qkw4UGr4xKFJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUPj14x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2jI8I6cxK62vIxIIY0VWUZVW8XwA2048vs2IY02 0E87I2jVAFwI0_JrWl82xGYIkIc2x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2 F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjx v20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2 z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0V AKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l Ox8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErc IFxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v2 6r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIxkGc2 Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_ Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r4j6F4UMI IF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjTRNzVbUUUU U X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org From: Yu Kuai Io will only be accounted as done from raid5_align_endio() if the io succeeded, and io inflight counter will be leaked if such io failed. Fix this problem by switching to use md_account_bio() for io accounting. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni --- drivers/md/raid5.c | 29 ++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index cef0b400b2ee..4cdb35e54251 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -5468,26 +5468,17 @@ static struct bio *remove_bio_from_retry(struct r5conf *conf, */ static void raid5_align_endio(struct bio *bi) { - struct md_io_clone *md_io_clone = bi->bi_private; - struct bio *raid_bi = md_io_clone->orig_bio; - struct mddev *mddev; - struct r5conf *conf; - struct md_rdev *rdev; + struct bio *raid_bi = bi->bi_private; + struct md_rdev *rdev = (void *)raid_bi->bi_next; + struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev; + struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private; blk_status_t error = bi->bi_status; - unsigned long start_time = md_io_clone->start_time; bio_put(bi); - - rdev = (void*)raid_bi->bi_next; raid_bi->bi_next = NULL; - mddev = rdev->mddev; - conf = mddev->private; - rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev); if (!error) { - if (blk_queue_io_stat(raid_bi->bi_bdev->bd_disk->queue)) - bio_end_io_acct(raid_bi, start_time); bio_endio(raid_bi); if (atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->active_aligned_reads)) wake_up(&conf->wait_for_quiescent); @@ -5506,7 +5497,6 @@ static int raid5_read_one_chunk(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *raid_bio) struct md_rdev *rdev; sector_t sector, end_sector, first_bad; int bad_sectors, dd_idx; - struct md_io_clone *md_io_clone; bool did_inc; if (!in_chunk_boundary(mddev, raid_bio)) { @@ -5543,16 +5533,13 @@ static int raid5_read_one_chunk(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *raid_bio) return 0; } - align_bio = bio_alloc_clone(rdev->bdev, raid_bio, GFP_NOIO, - &mddev->io_clone_set); - md_io_clone = container_of(align_bio, struct md_io_clone, bio_clone); + md_account_bio(mddev, &raid_bio); raid_bio->bi_next = (void *)rdev; - if (blk_queue_io_stat(raid_bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->queue)) - md_io_clone->start_time = bio_start_io_acct(raid_bio); - md_io_clone->orig_bio = raid_bio; + align_bio = bio_alloc_clone(rdev->bdev, raid_bio, GFP_NOIO, + &mddev->bio_set); align_bio->bi_end_io = raid5_align_endio; - align_bio->bi_private = md_io_clone; + align_bio->bi_private = raid_bio; align_bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector; /* No reshape active, so we can trust rdev->data_offset */