From patchwork Wed Jun 28 01:57:50 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Li Nan X-Patchwork-Id: 13295171 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F302C0015E for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 01:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231255AbjF1B64 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 21:58:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230205AbjF1B6y (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 21:58:54 -0400 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BE952D58; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.143]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QrPrN4X4rz4f3pJT; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:58:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgCH77LTk5tkJ6nJMg--.6175S5; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:58:45 +0800 (CST) From: linan666@huaweicloud.com To: song@kernel.org, guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com, colyli@suse.de, xni@redhat.com Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linan122@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH 1/3] md/raid10: check replacement and rdev to prevent submit the same io twice Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:57:50 +0800 Message-Id: <20230628015752.102267-2-linan666@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230628015752.102267-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230628015752.102267-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgCH77LTk5tkJ6nJMg--.6175S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrtrWxZw48Cr48Kw4fWFW3Jrb_yoWfurXEkw s5AF9aqr1xKF13Cwn0kr1IvrWDXw1qgFy7WrWYgrWYvFy5uryUKrW0gFZ7W3W5CrWDZr15 Ar1DKa1UArn8AjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbLkYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Xr0_Wr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20E Y4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l82xGYIkIc2x26280x7IE14v26r18M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW5JwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK 021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26w1j6s0DM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r 4UJVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_ GcCE3s1lnxkEFVAIw20F6cxK64vIFxWle2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64 xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j 6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2 kIc2xKxwAKzVCY07xG64k0F24lc7CjxVAaw2AFwI0_Jw0_GFyl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l 4c8EcI0Ec7CjxVAaw2AFwI0_Jw0_GFyl4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4 xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43 MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I 0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWU JVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUcq 2NDUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: polqt0awwwqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org From: Li Nan After commit 4ca40c2ce099 ("md/raid10: Allow replacement device to be replace old drive."), 'rdev' and 'replacement' could appear to be identical. There are already checks for that in wait_blocked_dev() and raid10_write_request(). Add check for raid10_handle_discard() now. Signed-off-by: Li Nan Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c index fabc340aae4f..3e6a09aaaba6 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -1811,6 +1811,8 @@ static int raid10_handle_discard(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio) r10_bio->devs[disk].bio = NULL; r10_bio->devs[disk].repl_bio = NULL; + if (rdev == rrdev) + rrdev = NULL; if (rdev && (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))) rdev = NULL; if (rrdev && (test_bit(Faulty, &rrdev->flags)))