From patchwork Thu Feb 29 15:49:41 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xiao Ni X-Patchwork-Id: 13577307 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E281433A4 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709221819; cv=none; b=nhvezF+z+mCkssaiJqaEREzKY+JBBRmb4mzKTbuAJxP0XugoFmlxs0iKfrYmaos22ZHRodtcvGU85fexqXfcvilM5YGToctDYrn8vwNNtQUknmAv1v2dRc3p/s+VRHur1t5vim1PnPzjoTfCO3lLlfC4SmW7yqOBRheVQ7DkL80= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709221819; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LTEfMG/Orgek9/+KffFIHJIsvwmTWlrcesY7nf5S5BA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=nj608DIrPnyLSH5dTSv3gvUI7durDYh6w15sulpPj26ovh0lcICbCw1k40hWDqVm9X/RDQqKC5KHfwmffDNOoWm0Tn9MJnyOVl8XUTP/QfYZL65c4FeU8o7iZWNi6xh6ISNPeGCA8mGB7dDC0cF9q1SfU1axSJFbTtHt3qWzHUM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Qd/A6Y/H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Qd/A6Y/H" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1709221817; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bJTPXuN6gXL91A4tWiu0yacncmf8eEQurT0X3u/rYoI=; b=Qd/A6Y/HHG5pJ7Tu1LwucSpkjWtToPyqX/NizGKIjLy1ovI7SkNDpFkCbwUExHP6XbnHi2 6IW6qs/Fd1Cgvj9ewpdzaL06lENXEMPB2Tzb/ynj0SNRbC6kqNE65J8PSam2z1UpN2VXHs yd4rVZINWKRmXSRhlyTQRG3R7yRvGx8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-324-MmeF2vMhNeWvQ-uoaQ7iJQ-1; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:50:13 -0500 X-MC-Unique: MmeF2vMhNeWvQ-uoaQ7iJQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB66029AA3BB; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.72.120.8]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EE4C185C0; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:50:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Xiao Ni To: song@kernel.org Cc: yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, bmarzins@redhat.com, heinzm@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, ncroxon@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH 6/6] md/raid5: Don't check crossing reshape when reshape hasn't started Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 23:49:41 +0800 Message-Id: <20240229154941.99557-7-xni@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240229154941.99557-1-xni@redhat.com> References: <20240229154941.99557-1-xni@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.8 stripe_ahead_of_reshape is used to check if a stripe region cross the reshape position. So first, change the function name to stripe_across_reshape to describe the usage of this function. For reshape backwards, it starts reshape from the end of array and conf-> reshape_progress is init to raid5_size. During reshape, if previous is true (set in make_stripe_request) and max_sector >= conf->reshape_progress, ios should wait until reshape window moves forward. But ios don't need to wait if max_sector is raid5_size. And put the conditions into the function directly to make understand the codes easily. This can be reproduced easily by lvm2 test shell/lvconvert-raid-reshape.sh For dm raid reshape, before starting sync thread, it needs to reload table some times. In one time dm raid uses MD_RECOVERY_WAIT to delay reshape and it doesn't start sync thread this time. Then one io comes in and it waits because stripe_ahead_of_reshape returns true because it's a backward reshape and max_sectors > conf->reshape_progress. But the reshape hasn't started. So skip this check when reshape_progress is raid5_size Fixes: 486f60558607 ("md/raid5: Check all disks in a stripe_head for reshape progress") Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni --- drivers/md/raid5.c | 22 ++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index 8497880135ee..965991a3104f 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -5832,17 +5832,12 @@ static bool ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector, sector >= reshape_sector; } -static bool range_ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t min, - sector_t max, sector_t reshape_sector) -{ - return mddev->reshape_backwards ? max < reshape_sector : - min >= reshape_sector; -} - -static bool stripe_ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, struct r5conf *conf, +static sector_t raid5_size(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sectors, int raid_disks); +static bool stripe_across_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh) { sector_t max_sector = 0, min_sector = MaxSector; + sector_t reshape_pos = 0; bool ret = false; int dd_idx; @@ -5856,9 +5851,12 @@ static bool stripe_ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, struct r5conf *conf, spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock); - if (!range_ahead_of_reshape(mddev, min_sector, max_sector, - conf->reshape_progress)) - /* mismatch, need to try again */ + reshape_pos = conf->reshape_progress; + if (mddev->reshape_backwards) { + if (max_sector >= reshape_pos && + reshape_pos != raid5_size(mddev, 0, 0)) + ret = true; + } else if (min_sector < reshape_pos) ret = true; spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock); @@ -5969,7 +5967,7 @@ static enum stripe_result make_stripe_request(struct mddev *mddev, } if (unlikely(previous) && - stripe_ahead_of_reshape(mddev, conf, sh)) { + stripe_across_reshape(mddev, conf, sh)) { /* * Expansion moved on while waiting for a stripe. * Expansion could still move past after this