From patchwork Wed Aug 14 07:11:12 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Kuai X-Patchwork-Id: 13762959 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54485166307; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 07:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723619747; cv=none; b=EZCw1hy96ZbAJ109bZW8ljE7pTfOYEEaEeupuf4Uw31GGz6aETI5zSyzKuHK1FAA06+qGTdPC/S+DdNJ/baXQZkdgc36+PYMwf6TK298aI4a/rdkG2jHKZk2qLa1BA/cU2xQhVexFZE2GP8Pytc/33FjdmGsYD0zkVLxiANEaZI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723619747; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JswwGZLpNwKWl1bJMKJYKLDWe7fKlxSB4TMBUa0LeJ8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=CSvvBCkzgv97w1ldPb+zoPtEuz9aHsvLYqcsQ3JLPzTYoYo8Tcvr2bPzYNx1HvqyT6HPt5fuPeg+YaOvkwjPG18jHL4unxXMUrPepXQ2qxTQJEH6BXeHCJJsliI9YpJR+6RAJ0t0G9A2lEsOGwK+ZFZwAWcmpO3l+xNc7LcvB80= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WkKKC48TTz4f3kvP; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:15:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492AE1A058E; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:15:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgBHboSLWbxmIxKbBg--.47745S44; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:15:42 +0800 (CST) From: Yu Kuai To: mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com, hch@infradead.org, song@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH RFC -next v2 40/41] md/md-bitmap: merge md_bitmap_enabled() into bitmap_operations Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:11:12 +0800 Message-Id: <20240814071113.346781-41-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240814071113.346781-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240814071113.346781-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgBHboSLWbxmIxKbBg--.47745S44 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxur47GF13try3ZFy3Cr1rZwb_yoW5WFWrpa yDJa4Ykr15JFy3W3W3ArW8CFy5tw1ktrZrKryfC395uFy3ZF9xGF4rWFWjy3Z3CFy3CFsx Xr45tryUCr4UWr7anT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUP014x267AKxVWrJVCq3wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2048vs2IY020E87I2jVAFwI0_JF0E3s1l82xGYI kIc2x26xkF7I0E14v26ryj6s0DM28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2 z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr1j6r xdM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0D M2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjx v20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1l F7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lF7I21c0EjII2zVCS5cI20VAGYxC7MxkF7I0En4kS14v26r1q6r 43MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_ Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCIc40Y0x 0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26F1j6w1UMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8 Jr0_Cr1UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWxJw CI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7VUbPC7UUU UUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ From: Yu Kuai So that the implementation won't be exposed, and it'll be possible to invent a new bitmap by replacing bitmap_operations. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai --- drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- drivers/md/md-bitmap.h | 8 +------- drivers/md/raid1-10.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c index c6826cb28ed2..8b9f0560f02f 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c @@ -40,6 +40,22 @@ static inline char *bmname(struct bitmap *bitmap) return bitmap->mddev ? mdname(bitmap->mddev) : "mdX"; } +static bool __bitmap_enabled(struct bitmap *bitmap) +{ + return bitmap->storage.filemap && + !test_bit(BITMAP_STALE, &bitmap->flags); +} + +static bool bitmap_enabled(struct mddev *mddev) +{ + struct bitmap *bitmap = mddev->bitmap; + + if (!bitmap) + return false; + + return __bitmap_enabled(bitmap); +} + /* * check a page and, if necessary, allocate it (or hijack it if the alloc fails) * @@ -1035,7 +1051,7 @@ static void __bitmap_unplug(struct bitmap *bitmap) int dirty, need_write; int writing = 0; - if (!md_bitmap_enabled(bitmap)) + if (!__bitmap_enabled(bitmap)) return; /* look at each page to see if there are any set bits that need to be @@ -2742,6 +2758,7 @@ const struct attribute_group md_bitmap_group = { }; static struct bitmap_operations bitmap_ops = { + .enabled = bitmap_enabled, .create = bitmap_create, .resize = bitmap_resize, .load = bitmap_load, diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h index b232ac57c0dc..364e00833aef 100644 --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ struct md_bitmap_stats { }; struct bitmap_operations { + bool (*enabled)(struct mddev *mddev); int (*create)(struct mddev *mddev, int slot); int (*resize)(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t blocks, int chunksize, bool init); @@ -297,12 +298,5 @@ static inline u64 md_bitmap_events_cleared(struct mddev *mddev) return stats.events_cleared; } -static inline bool md_bitmap_enabled(struct bitmap *bitmap) -{ - return bitmap && bitmap->storage.filemap && - !test_bit(BITMAP_STALE, &bitmap->flags); -} - #endif - #endif diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c index e8207513eb1b..4378d3250bd7 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid1-10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid1-10.c @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static inline bool raid1_add_bio_to_plug(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio, * If bitmap is not enabled, it's safe to submit the io directly, and * this can get optimal performance. */ - if (!md_bitmap_enabled(mddev->bitmap)) { + if (!mddev->bitmap_ops->enabled(mddev)) { raid1_submit_write(bio); return true; }