mbox series

[0/6] More 5.3 patches

Message ID 20190715164423.74174.4994.stgit@awfm-01.aw.intel.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series More 5.3 patches | expand

Message

Marciniszyn, Mike July 15, 2019, 4:45 p.m. UTC
The following series contains fixes and a cleanup.

I noticed that 5.3 rc1 hasn't happened yet? So I'm not quite sure of
the destination here.

5 of the patches are stable, and should be held for the rc or pulled for 5.3.

Deleting the unused define can wait if necessary.

---

John Fleck (1):
      IB/hfi1: Check for error on call to alloc_rsm_map_table

Kaike Wan (4):
      IB/hfi1: Unreserve a flushed OPFN request
      IB/hfi1: Field not zero-ed when allocating TID flow memory
      IB/hfi1: Drop all TID RDMA READ RESP packets after r_next_psn
      IB/hfi1: Do not update hcrc for a KDETH packet during fault injection

Mike Marciniszyn (1):
      IB/hfi1: Remove unused define


 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.c      |   11 +++++++-
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/rc.c        |    2 -
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/tid_rdma.c  |   43 +-------------------------------
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_sdma.h |    6 ----
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/verbs.c     |   17 +++++++------
 include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h               |    9 +++----
 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

Comments

Jason Gunthorpe July 15, 2019, 5:54 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:45:14PM -0400, Mike Marciniszyn wrote:
> The following series contains fixes and a cleanup.
> 
> I noticed that 5.3 rc1 hasn't happened yet? So I'm not quite sure of
> the destination here.

You shouldn't send patches during the merge window. If they don't
apply cleanly to rc1 they will need resend.

Jason
Marciniszyn, Mike July 15, 2019, 5:55 p.m. UTC | #2
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] More 5.3 patches
> 
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:45:14PM -0400, Mike Marciniszyn wrote:
> > The following series contains fixes and a cleanup.
> >
> > I noticed that 5.3 rc1 hasn't happened yet? So I'm not quite sure of
> > the destination here.
> 
> You shouldn't send patches during the merge window. If they don't
> apply cleanly to rc1 they will need resend.
> 

They apply cleanly to for-next and rdma/for-next.

Mike
Jason Gunthorpe July 15, 2019, 6:04 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:55:02PM +0000, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] More 5.3 patches
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:45:14PM -0400, Mike Marciniszyn wrote:
> > > The following series contains fixes and a cleanup.
> > >
> > > I noticed that 5.3 rc1 hasn't happened yet? So I'm not quite sure of
> > > the destination here.
> > 
> > You shouldn't send patches during the merge window. If they don't
> > apply cleanly to rc1 they will need resend.
> > 
> 
> They apply cleanly to for-next and rdma/for-next.

Those branches are done - we are jumping to 5.3-rc1 next Monday.

Jason
Marciniszyn, Mike July 15, 2019, 6:05 p.m. UTC | #4
> > They apply cleanly to for-next and rdma/for-next.
> 
> Those branches are done - we are jumping to 5.3-rc1 next Monday.
> 
> Jason

Ok.  I will resubmit on that base.

Mike
Jason Gunthorpe July 22, 2019, 6:03 p.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:45:14PM -0400, Mike Marciniszyn wrote:
> The following series contains fixes and a cleanup.
> 
> I noticed that 5.3 rc1 hasn't happened yet? So I'm not quite sure of
> the destination here.
> 
> 5 of the patches are stable, and should be held for the rc or pulled for 5.3.
> 
> Deleting the unused define can wait if necessary.
> 
> 
> John Fleck (1):
>       IB/hfi1: Check for error on call to alloc_rsm_map_table
> 
> Kaike Wan (4):
>       IB/hfi1: Unreserve a flushed OPFN request
>       IB/hfi1: Field not zero-ed when allocating TID flow memory
>       IB/hfi1: Drop all TID RDMA READ RESP packets after r_next_psn

These four look OK for -rc, applied

>       IB/hfi1: Do not update hcrc for a KDETH packet during fault injection

This looks like it is just debugging fixing, it can go to -next

So all 6 applied

Thanks,
Jason