Message ID | 20200125021115.731629-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mm/gup: track FOLL_PIN pages (follow on from v12) | expand |
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 06:11:12PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: > Leon Romanovsky: > > If you get a chance, I'd love to have this short series (or even just > the first patch; the others are just selftests) run through your test > suite that was previously choking on my earlier v11 patchset. The huge > page pincount limitations are removed, so I'm expecting a perfect test > run this time! > I added those patches to our regression and I will post the in the couple of days. Thanks
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 06:23:39PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 06:11:12PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: > > Leon Romanovsky: > > > > If you get a chance, I'd love to have this short series (or even just > > the first patch; the others are just selftests) run through your test > > suite that was previously choking on my earlier v11 patchset. The huge > > page pincount limitations are removed, so I'm expecting a perfect test > > run this time! > > > > I added those patches to our regression and I will post the in the > couple of days. Hi John, The patches survived our RDMA verification night runs. Thanks > > Thanks >
On 1/28/20 9:47 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 06:23:39PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 06:11:12PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: >>> Leon Romanovsky: >>> >>> If you get a chance, I'd love to have this short series (or even just >>> the first patch; the others are just selftests) run through your test >>> suite that was previously choking on my earlier v11 patchset. The huge >>> page pincount limitations are removed, so I'm expecting a perfect test >>> run this time! >>> >> >> I added those patches to our regression and I will post the in the >> couple of days. > > Hi John, > > The patches survived our RDMA verification night runs. > Great! Thanks very much for running those. That's a pretty solid confirmation that the earlier patch *did* allow a huge page refcount overflow, and that this approach avoids it. thanks,