diff mbox series

[RESEND,v2,1/2] IB/rdmavt: Add new completion inline

Message ID 20190613123040.5297.83018.stgit@awdrv-06.aw.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined
Commit f56044d686c82bd31713fc0398d68e322813dc62
Headers show
Series Completion rework | expand

Commit Message

Marciniszyn, Mike June 13, 2019, 12:30 p.m. UTC
There is opencoded send completion logic all over all
the drivers.

We need to convert to this routine to enforce ordering
issues for completions.  This routine fixes an ordering
issue where the read of the SWQE fields necessary for creating
the completion can race with a post send if the post send catches
a send queue at the edge of being full.  Is is possible in that situation
to read SWQE fields that are being written.

This new routine insures that SWQE fields are read prior to advancing
the index that post send uses to determine queue fullness.

Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
---
v2 - use smp_store_release on write of s_last
---
 include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h |   72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h b/include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h
index 68e38c2..6014f17 100644
--- a/include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h
+++ b/include/rdma/rdmavt_qp.h
@@ -737,6 +737,78 @@  static inline void rvt_put_qp_swqe(struct rvt_qp *qp, struct rvt_swqe *wqe)
 		atomic_dec(&ibah_to_rvtah(wqe->ud_wr.ah)->refcount);
 }
 
+/**
+ * rvt_qp_sqwe_incr - increment ring index
+ * @qp: the qp
+ * @val: the starting value
+ *
+ * Return: the new value wrapping as appropriate
+ */
+static inline u32
+rvt_qp_swqe_incr(struct rvt_qp *qp, u32 val)
+{
+	if (++val >= qp->s_size)
+		val = 0;
+	return val;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rvt_qp_complete_swqe - insert send completion
+ * @qp - the qp
+ * @wqe - the send wqe
+ * @opcode - wc operation (driver dependent)
+ * @status - completion status
+ *
+ * Update the s_last information, and then insert a send
+ * completion into the completion
+ * queue if the qp indicates it should be done.
+ *
+ * See IBTA 10.7.3.1 for info on completion
+ * control.
+ *
+ * Return: new last
+ */
+static inline u32
+rvt_qp_complete_swqe(struct rvt_qp *qp,
+		     struct rvt_swqe *wqe,
+		     enum ib_wc_opcode opcode,
+		     enum ib_wc_status status)
+{
+	bool need_completion;
+	u64 wr_id;
+	u32 byte_len, last;
+	int flags = wqe->wr.send_flags;
+
+	rvt_put_qp_swqe(qp, wqe);
+
+	need_completion =
+		!(flags & RVT_SEND_RESERVE_USED) &&
+		(!(qp->s_flags & RVT_S_SIGNAL_REQ_WR) ||
+		(flags & IB_SEND_SIGNALED) ||
+		status != IB_WC_SUCCESS);
+	if (need_completion) {
+		wr_id = wqe->wr.wr_id;
+		byte_len = wqe->length;
+		/* above fields required before writing s_last */
+	}
+	last = rvt_qp_swqe_incr(qp, qp->s_last);
+	/* see rvt_qp_is_avail() */
+	smp_store_release(&qp->s_last, last);
+	if (need_completion) {
+		struct ib_wc w = {
+			.wr_id = wr_id,
+			.status = status,
+			.opcode = opcode,
+			.qp = &qp->ibqp,
+			.byte_len = byte_len,
+		};
+
+		rvt_cq_enter(ibcq_to_rvtcq(qp->ibqp.send_cq), &w,
+			     status != IB_WC_SUCCESS);
+	}
+	return last;
+}
+
 extern const int  ib_rvt_state_ops[];
 
 struct rvt_dev_info;