From patchwork Wed Feb 9 14:11:13 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "D. Wythe" X-Patchwork-Id: 12740316 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C728EC43217 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 14:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234807AbiBIOLc (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:11:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45728 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234817AbiBIOLb (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:11:31 -0500 Received: from out30-54.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-54.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.54]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE2CC05CB90; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 06:11:26 -0800 (PST) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R111e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04395;MF=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0V4.oVI6_1644415882; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:alibuda@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0V4.oVI6_1644415882) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 22:11:23 +0800 From: "D. Wythe" To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, "D. Wythe" Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] net/smc: Fallback when handshake workqueue congested Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:11:13 +0800 Message-Id: <87d49c573a15e13a26314316692fccca91741042.1644413637.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org From: "D. Wythe" This patch intends to provide a mechanism to allow automatic fallback to TCP according to the pressure of SMC handshake process. At present, frequent visits will cause the incoming connections to be backlogged in SMC handshake queue, raise the connections established time. Which is quite unacceptable for those applications who base on short lived connections. There are two ways to implement this mechanism: 1. Fallback when TCP established. 2. Fallback before TCP established. In the first way, we need to wait and receive CLC messages that the client will potentially send, and then actively reply with a decline message, in a sense, which is also a sort of SMC handshake, affect the connections established time on its way. In the second way, the only problem is that we need to inject SMC logic into TCP when it is about to reply the incoming SYN, since we already do that, it's seems not a problem anymore. And advantage is obvious, few additional processes are required to complete the fallback. This patch use the second way. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1641301961-59331-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com/ Signed-off-by: D. Wythe --- include/linux/tcp.h | 1 + net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 3 ++- net/smc/af_smc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h index 78b91bb..1c4ae5d 100644 --- a/include/linux/tcp.h +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ struct tcp_sock { bool is_mptcp; #endif #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC) + bool (*smc_in_limited)(const struct sock *sk); bool syn_smc; /* SYN includes SMC */ #endif diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index af94a6d..e817ec6 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -6703,7 +6703,8 @@ static void tcp_openreq_init(struct request_sock *req, ireq->ir_num = ntohs(tcp_hdr(skb)->dest); ireq->ir_mark = inet_request_mark(sk, skb); #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC) - ireq->smc_ok = rx_opt->smc_ok; + ireq->smc_ok = rx_opt->smc_ok && !(tcp_sk(sk)->smc_in_limited && + tcp_sk(sk)->smc_in_limited(sk)); #endif } diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index ebfce3d..8175f60 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -101,6 +101,22 @@ static struct sock *smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff return NULL; } +static bool smc_is_in_limited(const struct sock *sk) +{ + const struct smc_sock *smc; + + smc = (const struct smc_sock *) + ((uintptr_t)sk->sk_user_data & ~SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY); + + if (!smc) + return true; + + if (workqueue_congested(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, smc_hs_wq)) + return true; + + return false; +} + static struct smc_hashinfo smc_v4_hashinfo = { .lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(smc_v4_hashinfo.lock), }; @@ -2309,6 +2325,8 @@ static int smc_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog) inet_csk(smc->clcsock->sk)->icsk_af_ops = &smc->af_ops; + tcp_sk(smc->clcsock->sk)->smc_in_limited = smc_is_in_limited; + rc = kernel_listen(smc->clcsock, backlog); if (rc) { smc->clcsock->sk->sk_data_ready = smc->clcsk_data_ready;