mbox series

[V5,0/4] Signaling api support in glink/rpmsg clients

Message ID 1593182819-30747-1-git-send-email-deesin@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Signaling api support in glink/rpmsg clients | expand

Message

Deepak Kumar Singh June 26, 2020, 2:46 p.m. UTC
Change from version 5
[V5,4/4] rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
Updated for sparse warning. Replaced POLLPRI => EPOLLPRI to fix
warning.

Change from version 4
I am taking over these patches from aneela@codeaurora.org
Fixed all the trivial review comments.

Signal conversion to and from native signal as done in patch V4,2/4
is intentional.

Arun Kumar Neelakantam (3):
  rpmsg: glink: Add support to handle signals command
  rpmsg: char: Add TIOCMGET/TIOCMSET ioctl support
  rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support

Deepak Kumar Singh (1):
  rpmsg: core: Add signal API support

 drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c        |  76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c        |  40 ++++++++++++
 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h    |   5 ++
 include/linux/rpmsg.h             |  27 ++++++++
 5 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Mathieu Poirier July 6, 2020, 6:04 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Deepak,

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:16:55PM +0530, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote:
> Change from version 5
> [V5,4/4] rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
> Updated for sparse warning. Replaced POLLPRI => EPOLLPRI to fix
> warning.
> 
> Change from version 4
> I am taking over these patches from aneela@codeaurora.org
> Fixed all the trivial review comments.
> 
> Signal conversion to and from native signal as done in patch V4,2/4
> is intentional.
> 
> Arun Kumar Neelakantam (3):
>   rpmsg: glink: Add support to handle signals command
>   rpmsg: char: Add TIOCMGET/TIOCMSET ioctl support
>   rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
> 
> Deepak Kumar Singh (1):
>   rpmsg: core: Add signal API support

I'm confused here - V5 (or what I think it is) was sent out on June 24th without
a cover letter.  This set has a cover letter but it is labeled V5.  So is this
the cover letter that should have been sent out on the 24th and the content
herein relevent to that set?  Or is it accurate and the label on the cover
letter of this set is wrong and should have been V6?

I have little confidence in both sets and as such won't be reviewing them.
Please send a new revision that is properly labeled.

Thanks,
Mathieu   


> 
>  drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c        |  76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c        |  40 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h    |   5 ++
>  include/linux/rpmsg.h             |  27 ++++++++
>  5 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Deepak Kumar Singh Sept. 2, 2020, 4:30 p.m. UTC | #2
On 7/6/2020 11:34 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:16:55PM +0530, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote:
>> Change from version 5
>> [V5,4/4] rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
>> Updated for sparse warning. Replaced POLLPRI => EPOLLPRI to fix
>> warning.
>>
>> Change from version 4
>> I am taking over these patches from aneela@codeaurora.org
>> Fixed all the trivial review comments.
>>
>> Signal conversion to and from native signal as done in patch V4,2/4
>> is intentional.
>>
>> Arun Kumar Neelakantam (3):
>>    rpmsg: glink: Add support to handle signals command
>>    rpmsg: char: Add TIOCMGET/TIOCMSET ioctl support
>>    rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
>>
>> Deepak Kumar Singh (1):
>>    rpmsg: core: Add signal API support
> I'm confused here - V5 (or what I think it is) was sent out on June 24th without
> a cover letter.  This set has a cover letter but it is labeled V5.  So is this
> the cover letter that should have been sent out on the 24th and the content
> herein relevent to that set?  Or is it accurate and the label on the cover
> letter of this set is wrong and should have been V6?
>
> I have little confidence in both sets and as such won't be reviewing them.
> Please send a new revision that is properly labeled.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
Mistakenly i forgot to update label for cover letter to V6.

I have uploaded patch set V7 with updated cover letter.

There is no change in patches.

>>   drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c        |  76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c        |  40 ++++++++++++
>>   drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h    |   5 ++
>>   include/linux/rpmsg.h             |  27 ++++++++
>>   5 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> -- 
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>
Mathieu Poirier Sept. 2, 2020, 4:40 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 10:30, Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/6/2020 11:34 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Hi Deepak,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 08:16:55PM +0530, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote:
> >> Change from version 5
> >> [V5,4/4] rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
> >> Updated for sparse warning. Replaced POLLPRI => EPOLLPRI to fix
> >> warning.
> >>
> >> Change from version 4
> >> I am taking over these patches from aneela@codeaurora.org
> >> Fixed all the trivial review comments.
> >>
> >> Signal conversion to and from native signal as done in patch V4,2/4
> >> is intentional.
> >>
> >> Arun Kumar Neelakantam (3):
> >>    rpmsg: glink: Add support to handle signals command
> >>    rpmsg: char: Add TIOCMGET/TIOCMSET ioctl support
> >>    rpmsg: char: Add signal callback and POLLPRI support
> >>
> >> Deepak Kumar Singh (1):
> >>    rpmsg: core: Add signal API support
> > I'm confused here - V5 (or what I think it is) was sent out on June 24th without
> > a cover letter.  This set has a cover letter but it is labeled V5.  So is this
> > the cover letter that should have been sent out on the 24th and the content
> > herein relevent to that set?  Or is it accurate and the label on the cover
> > letter of this set is wrong and should have been V6?
> >
> > I have little confidence in both sets and as such won't be reviewing them.
> > Please send a new revision that is properly labeled.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> >
> Mistakenly i forgot to update label for cover letter to V6.
>
> I have uploaded patch set V7 with updated cover letter.

Thank you for doing that - I have added your set to my list of patches
to review.  Note that I have a fair amount of patches to go over
lately and as such getting to yours will take some time.

Regards,
Mathieu

>
> There is no change in patches.
>
> >>   drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c        |  76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>   drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c        |  40 ++++++++++++
> >>   drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h    |   5 ++
> >>   include/linux/rpmsg.h             |  27 ++++++++
> >>   5 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> >> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> >>
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>