| Message ID | 1512060411-729-8-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
On Thu 30 Nov 08:46 PST 2017, Loic Pallardy wrote: > ST remote processor needs some specified memory regions for firmware and IPC. > Memory regions are defined as reserved memory and should be registered in > remoteproc core thanks to rproc_add_carveout function. > Memory region release is handled by ST driver itself on remove operation. > > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > index aacef0e..1549ce8 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > #include <linux/of_device.h> > #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > @@ -208,8 +209,10 @@ static int st_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > struct st_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > - int err; > + struct device_node *node, *np = dev->of_node; > + struct resource res; > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > + int err, count, i; > > if (ddata->config->sw_reset) { > ddata->sw_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, > @@ -254,10 +257,36 @@ static int st_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -EINVAL; > } > > - err = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev); > - if (err) { > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to obtain shared memory\n"); > - return err; > + count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "memory-region", NULL); > + > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { If you use of_phandle_iterator this becomes a little bit more compact and using of_reserved_mem_lookup() gives you the flexibility of specifying the reserved-memory using size= in addition to a reg=. of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, "memory-region", NULL, 0); while ((err = of_phandle_iterator_next(&it)) == 0) { rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it->node); // Memory is rmem->base, rmem->size; } > + node = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i); > + if (!node) { > + dev_err(dev, "No memory-region specified\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(dev, "Bad memory-region definition\n"); > + return err; > + } > + > + mem = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!mem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + mem->dma = res.start; > + mem->da = res.start; > + mem->len = resource_size(&res); > + mem->va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, mem->dma, mem->len); > + if (!mem->va) { > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n", > + &res.start, mem->len); > + return -EBUSY; > + } > + > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > } We have a few copies of this logic, how about we move this into a helper function in the core? Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Andersson [mailto:bjorn.andersson@linaro.org] > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 2:16 AM > To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@st.com> > Cc: ohad@wizery.com; linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>; > benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] remoteproc: st: add reserved memory support > > On Thu 30 Nov 08:46 PST 2017, Loic Pallardy wrote: > > > ST remote processor needs some specified memory regions for firmware > and IPC. > > Memory regions are defined as reserved memory and should be registered > in > > remoteproc core thanks to rproc_add_carveout function. > > Memory region release is handled by ST driver itself on remove operation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> > > --- > > drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 43 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > > index aacef0e..1549ce8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > > #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/of.h> > > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > > #include <linux/of_device.h> > > #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > @@ -208,8 +209,10 @@ static int st_rproc_parse_dt(struct > platform_device *pdev) > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > struct st_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > > - int err; > > + struct device_node *node, *np = dev->of_node; > > + struct resource res; > > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > > + int err, count, i; > > > > if (ddata->config->sw_reset) { > > ddata->sw_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, > > @@ -254,10 +257,36 @@ static int st_rproc_parse_dt(struct > platform_device *pdev) > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > - err = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev); > > - if (err) { > > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to obtain shared memory\n"); > > - return err; > > + count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "memory-region", NULL); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > > If you use of_phandle_iterator this becomes a little bit more compact > and using of_reserved_mem_lookup() gives you the flexibility of > specifying the reserved-memory using size= in addition to a reg=. > > of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, "memory-region", NULL, 0); > while ((err = of_phandle_iterator_next(&it)) == 0) { > rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it->node); > > // Memory is rmem->base, rmem->size; > } > Good point, thanks > > + node = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i); > > + if (!node) { > > + dev_err(dev, "No memory-region specified\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res); > > + if (err) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Bad memory-region definition\n"); > > + return err; > > + } > > + > > + mem = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!mem) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + mem->dma = res.start; > > + mem->da = res.start; > > + mem->len = resource_size(&res); > > + mem->va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, mem->dma, mem- > >len); > > + if (!mem->va) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: > %pa+%zx\n", > > + &res.start, mem->len); > > + return -EBUSY; > > + } > > + > > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > > } > > We have a few copies of this logic, how about we move this into a helper > function in the core? > Yes, helper function to abstract rproc_mem_entry structure would be nice Regards, Loic > Regards, > Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c index aacef0e..1549ce8 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> @@ -208,8 +209,10 @@ static int st_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); struct st_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; - int err; + struct device_node *node, *np = dev->of_node; + struct resource res; + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; + int err, count, i; if (ddata->config->sw_reset) { ddata->sw_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, @@ -254,10 +257,36 @@ static int st_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) return -EINVAL; } - err = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev); - if (err) { - dev_err(dev, "Failed to obtain shared memory\n"); - return err; + count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "memory-region", NULL); + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + node = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i); + if (!node) { + dev_err(dev, "No memory-region specified\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res); + if (err) { + dev_err(dev, "Bad memory-region definition\n"); + return err; + } + + mem = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!mem) + return -ENOMEM; + + mem->dma = res.start; + mem->da = res.start; + mem->len = resource_size(&res); + mem->va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, mem->dma, mem->len); + if (!mem->va) { + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n", + &res.start, mem->len); + return -EBUSY; + } + + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); } err = clk_prepare(ddata->clk); @@ -387,8 +416,6 @@ static int st_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) clk_disable_unprepare(ddata->clk); - of_reserved_mem_device_release(&pdev->dev); - for (i = 0; i < ST_RPROC_MAX_VRING * MBOX_MAX; i++) mbox_free_channel(ddata->mbox_chan[i]);
ST remote processor needs some specified memory regions for firmware and IPC. Memory regions are defined as reserved memory and should be registered in remoteproc core thanks to rproc_add_carveout function. Memory region release is handled by ST driver itself on remove operation. Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> --- drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)